122
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Microwave diathermy in physiotherapy units: lack of maintenance

, &
Pages 207-212 | Received 08 Dec 2017, Accepted 04 Mar 2018, Published online: 19 Mar 2018

References

  • Andrikopoulos A, Adamopoulos A, Seimenis I, et al. Microwave diathermy in physiotherapy units: a survey on spatial and time heterogeneity of the electromagnetic field. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37:27–41.
  • Shields N, O’Hare N, Boyle G, et al. Development and application of a quality control procedure for short-wave diathermy units. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:62–68.
  • Murray C, Kitchen S. Effect of pulse repetition rate on the perception of thermal sensation with pulsed shortwave diathermy. Physiother Res Int. 2000;5:73–84.
  • Shields N, O’Hare N, Gormley J. An evaluation of safety guidelines to restrict exposure to stray radiofrequency radiation from short-wave diathermy units. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2999–3015.
  • Recognition of professional qualifications in the EU. Struct Survey. 2005;23:22–121.
  • Guirro R, Guirro E, Alves de Sousa N. Lack of maintenance of shortwave diathermy equipment has a negative impact on power output. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:557–562.
  • Shah S, Farrow A. Assessment of physiotherapists’ occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from shortwave and microwave diathermy devices: a literature review. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10:312–327.
  • Floderus B, Stenlund C, Carlgren F. Occupational exposures to high frequency electromagnetic fields in the intermediate range (>300 Hz-10 MHz). Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:568–577.
  • Grant L. Radio frequency in physiotherapy. In Proceedings Abstracts of IPEM meeting ‘Electrotherapy—clinical effectiveness, safety and quality assurance’. Birmingham, UK. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), 17, 15–16; 2001.
  • Gryz K, Krapowicz J. Environmental impact of the use of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in physiotherapeutic treatment. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny. 2014;65:55–61.
  • Shah S, Farrow A. Systematic literature review of adverse reproductive outcomes associated with physiotherapists’ occupational exposures to non-ionising radiation. J Occup Health. 2014;56: 323–331.
  • Hrnjak M, Zivkoviae D. Occupational exposure to radiofrequency radiation when using shortwave diathermy in physical therapy. In 2nd International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Rhodes, Greece; 2002.
  • Gruber CR, Gewehr PM. Evaluation of short wave therapy equipment based on Brazilian standards. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2006;49:9–16.
  • Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Leszko W, et al. Objectivized evaluation of surgeons exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields – in the context of exposure duration and Polish and new international requirements regarding workers protection. Medycyna Pracy. 2013;64:487–501.
  • Teixeira SR, Messias IA, Pena AF. Electromagnetic fields produced by equipment used in short-wave therapy: an evaluation in Presidente Prudente. Braz J Phys Ther. 2001;5:35–40.
  • Benetazzo L, Bertocco M, Farias M, et al. (Evaluation of the electromagnetic field radiated by shortwave and microwave diathermy equipment. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, IMTC’03. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE, 2, 930–933; 2003.
  • Grandolfo M, Spinelli MC. Occupational exposure to shortwave and microwave electromagnetic fields during diathermy treatments. In 2nd International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 202–209; 2002.
  • Shah S, Farrow A. Investigation of practices and procedures in the use of therapeutic diathermy: a study from the physiotherapists’ health and safety perspective. Physiother Res Int. 2007;12:228–241.
  • McMeeken J, Stillman B. Microwave diathermy. Electrotherapy: evidence-based practice. Vol. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 145–165; 2002.
  • Karpowicz J, Gryz K. An assessment of hazards caused by electromagnetic interaction on humans present near short-wave physiotherapeutic devices of various types including hazards for users of electronic Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMD). BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–8.
  • Gryz K, Zradziński P, Karpowicz J. The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98–2450 MHz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.