Group physiotherapy targeting core stability and balance in individuals with multiple sclerosis. ‘Movement analyses and individualisations: potent change-making tools’

References

• Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltamaa J, Sjogren T, Peurala SH, et al. Effects of physiotherapy interventions on balance in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:811–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Kanekar N, Aruin AS. Anticipatory postural adjustments in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2012;506:256–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox EE, Hough AD, Creanor S, et al. Effects of pilates-based core stability training in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis: multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2016;96(8):1170–1178.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Kanekar N, Aruin AS. Feedforward postural control in individuals with multiple sclerosis during load release. Gait Posture. 2012;36:225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn H, Markevics S, Haas B, et al. Systematic review: the effectiveness of interventions to reduce falls and improve balance in adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1898–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann B, Salvesen R, Arntzen EC. Group-based individualized core stability and balance training in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot feasibility test–retest study. Eur J Physiother. 2016;18:173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg A, von Koch L, Nilsagård Y. Effects on balance and walking with the CoDuSe balance exercise program in people with multiple sclerosis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler Int. 2016;2016:1.
   Google Scholar
• NHS. Multiple sclerosis: management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg186.
   Google Scholar
• Frykberg GE, Vasa R. Neuroplasticity in action post-stroke: challenges for physiotherapists. Eur J Physiother. 2015;17:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys I, Drummond AE, Phillips C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an adjustment group for people with multiple sclerosis and low mood: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:963–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth YC, Paul L, Miller L, et al. The effects of a 12-week leisure centre-based, group exercise intervention for people moderately affected with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:579–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarakci E, Yeldan I, Huseyinsinoglu BE, et al. Group exercise training for balance, functional status, spasticity, fatigue and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:813–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Denisenko S, et al. A qualitative analysis of a progressive resistance exercise programme for people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1127–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth YC, Marshall-McKenna R, Paul L, et al. A qualitative exploration of the impact of a 12-week group exercise class for those moderately affected with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF. Expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert R. Practical evidence-based physiotherapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ajjawi R, Higgs J. Learning to reason: a journey of professional socialisation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:133–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjaerven LH, Kristoffersen K, Gard G. An eye for movement quality: a phenomenological study of movement quality reflecting a group of physiotherapists' understanding of the phenomenon. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:13–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gjelsvik B, Syre L. The Bobath concept in adult neurology. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Thagaard T. Systematikk og innlevelse: en innføring i kvalitativ metode. Bergen: Fagbokforl; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S, Anderssen TM, et al. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Normann B. Individualisering i nevrologisk fysioterapi: Bobathkonseptet: hjerneslagpasienter - behandling og kunnskapsgrunnlag. [Masters thesis]. Tromso: University of Tromso; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Øberg GK. Fysioterapi til for tidlig fødte barn - Om sensitivitet, samhandling og bevegelse. [PhD thesis]. Tromso: University of Tromso; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mo Hansen G, Pallesen H, Normann B. How is individualization in constraint-induced movement therapy performed? A qualitative observational study. Eur J Physiother. 2016;18:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjaerven LH, Kristoffersen K, Gard G. How can movement quality be promoted in clinical practice? A phenomenological study of physical therapist experts. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1479–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows L, Williams J. An understanding of functional movement as a basis for clinical reasoning. In: Raine S, Meadows L, Lynch-Ellerington M, editors. Bobath concept: theory and clinical practice in neurological rehabilitation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Fadnes B, Leira K, Brodal P, et al. Laeringsnøkkelen: om samspillet mellom bevegelser, balanse og laering. Oslo: Universitetsforl.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brodal P. Sentralnervesystemet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Wolf SL. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein JMD, editor. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson J, Patterson KK, Inness EL, et al. Relationship between asymmetry of quiet standing balance control and walking post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2014;39:177–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedal T, Lygren H, Myhr KM, et al. Balance and gait improved in patients with MS after physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept. Physiother Res Int. 2006;11:104–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Linden ML, Bulley C, Geneen LJ, et al. Pilates for people with multiple sclerosis who use a wheelchair: feasibility, efficacy and participant experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(11):932–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar