Comparison between two different protocols of lower limb constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a randomised controlled trial protocol

References

• Abdullahi A, Shehu S, Dantani BI. Feasibility of high repetitions of tasks practice during constraint induced movement therapy in an acute stroke patient. Int J Therap Rehabil. 2014;21:190–195.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Wu C, Hsieh Y, et al. Predictors of change in quality of life after distributed constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH, et al. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:972–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijntjesa M, Hamzeib F, Volkmar G, et al. Activation changes in sensorimotor cortex during improvement due to CIMT in chronic stroke. Rest Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29:299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X, et al. Differential patterns of cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy during early and late period after stroke: a preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35:415–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eur Medicophys J. 2006;42:257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constrained-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke. Brain Injury. 2005;19:3223–3230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• e Silva EMGS, Ribeiro TS, da Silva TCC, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy for lower limbs on measurements of functional mobility and postural balance in subjects with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24:555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti R, Tettamanti V, Sirtori V, et al. Disadvantage of the healthy lower limb in subacute poststroke subjects: a pilot study. Italian J Physiother. 2011;1:107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981;61:1022–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirofumi T, Toru N, Rumi T. Application of constraint induced movement therapy for people with severe chronic plegic hand. Asian J Occup Ther. 2011;9:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FM, Sabbahi M. Correlation of spasticity with hyperactive stretch reflexes and motor dysfunction in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:526–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A, et al. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland R, Kwakkel G, Bakers J, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the upper paretic limb in acute or sub-acute stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:425–433. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00646.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock R, Thrane G, Askim T, et al. Norwegian constraint-induced therapy multisite trial: adherence to treatment protocol applied early after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:816–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplon RT, Prettyman MG, Kushi CLCJ, et al. Six hours in the laboratory: quantification of practice time during constraint induced therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in one hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:620–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi A. Is time spent using constraint induced movement therapy an appropriate measure of dose? A critical literature review. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21:140–146.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulahi A. Number of repetitions as measure of dose of shaping practice in acute stroke: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32:402–403.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullahi A. Effects of number of repetitions and number of hours of shaping practice during constraint-induced movement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Res Int. 2018;2018:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danlami KA, Abdullahi A. Remodelling the protocol of lower limb constraint induced movement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Physiother Glob Res. 2018;21:21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JO, Kilbreath SL, Davis GM, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and walking ability in subacute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1780–1785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang MY, Eng JJ, Dawson AS. Relationship between ambulatory capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness in chronic stroke: influence of stroke-specific impairments. Chest. 2005;127:495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang A, Sibley KM, Bayley MT, et al. Do functional walk tests reflect cardiorespiratory fitness in sub-acute stroke? J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006;3:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson SL, Forrester LW, Rodgers MM. Determinants of walking function after stroke: differences by deficit severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–3325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125:773–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;2:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P. The berg balance scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HM, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, et al. The test-retest reliability of 2 mobility performance tests in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, DPT, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42:427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle L, Taft J, Morris D, et al. The validity and reliability of LE-MAL. J Neurol Phys Therap. 2003;27:172.
   Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Jette AM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument: II development and evaluation of the function component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai S, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0 evaluation of validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;99:2131–2140.
   Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:1018–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore P, et al. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 2000;29:223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira P, Leal A, Pulz C, et al. Clinical reliability of the 6 minute corridor walk test performed within a week of a myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2006;47:533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn A, Marsden DL, Barker D, et al. Evaluation of three measures of cardiorespiratory fitness in independently ambulant stroke survivors. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;30:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Columbia University. Missing-data imputatio, Chapter 25: Columbia Statistics. Accessed online from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/∼gelman/arm/missing.pdf on 24/11/2018
   Google Scholar
• Aruin AS, Hanke T, Chaudhuri G, et al. Compelled weight bearing in persons with hemiparesis following stroke: the effect of a lift insert and goal-directed balance exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vearrier LA, Langan J, Shumway-Cook A, et al. An intensive massed practice approach to retraining balance post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2005;22:154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Taub E, Schwandt D, et al. Automated constraint-induced therapy extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, et al. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke. 2005;36:1301–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice DB, McIntyre A, Mirkowski M, et al. Patient-centered goal setting in a hospital-based outpatient stroke rehabilitation center. PMR. 2017;9:856–865.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korpershoek C, van der Bijl J, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67:1876–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar