222
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exercise therapy and physical activity promotion: do exercise therapists assess or receive information on clients’ relevant personal factors? A national survey from Germany

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 290-298 | Received 03 Dec 2018, Accepted 04 May 2019, Published online: 05 Jun 2019

References

  • Dean E. Physical therapy in the 21st century (Part II): evidence-based practice within the context of evidence-informed practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25:354–368.
  • Wikström-Grotell C, Broberg C, Ahonen S, et al. From ling to the academic era – An analysis of the history of ideas in PT from a Nordic perspective. Eur J Physiother. 2013;15:168–180.
  • Dean E. Physical therapy in the 21st century (Part I): toward practice informed by epidemiology and the crisis of lifestyle conditions. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25:330–353.
  • Geidl W, Semrau J, Pfeifer K. Health behaviour change theories: contributions to an ICF-based behavioural exercise therapy for individuals with chronic diseases. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:2091–2100.
  • Lein DH, Clark D, Graham C, et al. A model to integrate health promotion and wellness in physical therapist practice: development and validation. Phys Ther. 2017;97:1169–1181.
  • Elvén M, Hochwälder J, Dean E, et al. A clinical reasoning model focused on clients’ behaviour change with reference to physiotherapists: its multiphase development and validation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:231–243.
  • Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–271.
  • Elvén M, Hochwälder J, Dean E, et al. Development and initial evaluation of an instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on clients’ behavior change. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34:367–383.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Brüggemann S, Sewöster D, Kranzmann A. Bewegungstherapeutische Versorgung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation der Rentenversicherung – eine Analyse auf Basis quantitativer Routinedaten [Exercise therapy in German medical rehabilitation – an analysis based on quantitative routine data]. Rehabilitation. 2017;57:24–30. German
  • Schüle K, Deimel H. Gesundheitssport und Sporttherapie – eine begriffliche Klärung. [Health sports and exercise therapy – a conceptual clarification]. Gesundheitssport Und Sporttherapie. 1990;1:3. German
  • Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund. Rahmenkonzept zur medizinischen Rehabilitation in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung [Framework concept for medical rehabilitation in the statutory pension insurance]. Berlin: Deutsche Rentenversicherung;2009. German
  • Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89:125–135.
  • Finch E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Hamilton: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
  • Leemrijse CJ, Plas GM, Hofhuis H, et al. Compliance with the guidelines for acute ankle sprain for physiotherapists is moderate in the Netherlands: an observational study. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52:293–299.
  • Van Peppen RPS, Maissan FJF, Van Genderen FR, et al. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:255–270.
  • Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, et al. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006;11:46–53.
  • Maher C, Williams M. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physiotherapy management of lung transplant patients in Australia and New Zealand. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005;21:201–217.
  • Körner M, Bütof S, Müller C, et al. Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2016;30:15–28.
  • Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund. Reha-Bericht 2015 [Rehabilitation report 2015]. DRV; 2015. German.
  • Geidl W, Deprins J, Streber R, et al. Exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation: study protocol of a national survey at facility and practitioner level with a mixed method design. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018;11:37–45.
  • Büsching G, Widmer Leu C. Kardiologie und Pneumologie: Assessments in der Rehabilitation [Cardiology and pulmonology: assessments in rehabilitation]. Bern: Hans Huber; 2009. German
  • Oesch P. Bewegungsapparat [Locomotion system]. Bern: Huber; 2011. German
  • Schädler S, Kool J, Lüthi H, et al. Assessments in der Rehabilitation: Neurologie [Assessment in rehabilitation: neurology]. Bern: Huber; 2012. German
  • Bös K. Handbuch motorische Tests: Sportmotorische Tests, motorische Funktionstests, Fragebogen zur körperlichen-sportlichen Aktivität und sportpsychologische Diagnoseverfahren [Manual of motor tests: motor sports tests, motor function tests, questionnaire on physical-sport activity and sport psychological diagnostic procedures]. 2nd ed. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001. German
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
  • Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;41:1–10.
  • Kuckartz U. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative content analysis: methods, practice, computer support]. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa; 2016. German
  • World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT guideline for standards of physical therapy practice. Available from: https://www.wcpt.org/sites/wcpt.org/files/files/Guideline_standards_practice_complete.pdf.
  • Schwarz B, Neuderth S, Gutenbrunner C, et al. Multiprofessional teamwork in work-related medical rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:58–65.
  • Körner M. Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:745–755.
  • Alexander J, Bambury E, Mendoza A, et al. Health education strategies used by physical therapists to promote behaviour change in people with lifestyle-related conditions: a systematic review. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2012;30:57–75.
  • Wikström-Grotell C, Eriksson K. Movement as a basic concept in physiotherapy – a human science approach. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:428–438.
  • Dean E, Andrade AD, de OG, et al. The Second Physical Therapy Summit on Global Health: developing an action plan to promote health in daily practice and reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30:261–275.
  • Foster NE, Delitto A. Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice-challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2011;91:790–803.
  • Shepard KF. Mary McMillan Lecture. Are you waving or drowning? Phys Ther. 2007;87:1543–1554.
  • Davies C, Nitz AJ, Mattacola CG, et al. Practice patterns when treating patients with low back pain: a survey of physical therapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30:399–408.
  • Duncan EAS, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:96.
  • Stevens JGA, Beurskens A. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. Phys Ther. 2010;90:953–961.
  • Wedge FM, Braswell-Christy J, Brown CJ, et al. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:119–133.
  • Dean E, Greig A, Murphy S, et al. Raising the priority of lifestyle-related noncommunicable diseases in physical therapy curricula. Phys Ther. 2016;96:940–948.
  • Potter K, Cohen ET, Allen DD, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with multiple sclerosis: recommendations from the American physical therapy association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2014;94:593–608.
  • Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American physical therapy association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1383–1396.
  • Kahn JH, Tappan R, Newman CP, et al. Outcome measure recommendations from the spinal cord injury edge task force. Phys Ther. 2016;96:1832–1842.
  • McCulloch KL, Joya AL, de Hays K, et al. Outcome measures for persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy TBI EDGE Task Force. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40:269–280.
  • Harrington S, Gilchrist L, Sander A. Breast cancer EDGE task force outcomes: clinical measures of pain. Rehabil Oncol. 2014;32:13–21.
  • Otterman N, Veerbeek J, Schiemanck S, et al. Selecting relevant and feasible measurement instruments for the revised Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1449–1457.
  • Rath HM, Steimann M, Ullrich A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM) in a cancer population. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:232–242.
  • Hislop HJ, Avers D, Brown M. Daniels and Worthingham’s muscle testing: techniques of manual examination and performance testing. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2014.
  • Ryf C, Weymann A. The neutral zero method: a principle of measuring joint function. Injury. 1995;26:SA1-SA11.
  • Butland RJA, Pang J, Gross ER, et al. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J. 1982;284:1607–1608.
  • Podsiadlo D. The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriart Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
  • Kippers V, Parker AW. Toe-touch test. A measure of its validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1680–1684.
  • Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, Berg Balance Scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002;82:128–137.
  • Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Stress echocardiography from 1979 to present. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:22–28.
  • Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, et al. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:553–559.
  • Jackson A, Carnel C, Ditunno J, et al. Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:487–499.
  • Rabin A, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, et al. The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:840–843.
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S240–S252.
  • Cleland BT, Ingraham BA, Pitluck MC, et al. Reliability and validity of ratings of perceived exertion in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:974–982.
  • Matheson LN, Matheson ML, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3:15–30.
  • Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1314–1319.
  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
  • Löffler S, Wolf HD, Vogel H. Das Würzburger Screening zur Identifikation von beruflichen Problemlagen – Entwicklung und Validierung [The Würzburg screening for the identification of occupational problems – development and validation]. Gesundheitswesen. 2008;70:A77. German
  • Kohlmann T, Raspe H. The Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire for measuring back pain-related functional limitations (FFbH-R). Rehabilitation. 1996;35:I–VIII.
  • Löwe B, Wahl I, Rose M, et al. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010;122:86–95.
  • Härter K. Screening for anxiety, depressive and somatoform disorders in rehabilitation validity of HADS and GHQ-12 in patients with musculoskeletal disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;23:737–744.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.