Rasch analysis of the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in persons with back and neck pain receiving physiotherapy in a primary care context

References

• Fejer R, Kyvik K, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:834–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wändell P, Carlsson AC, Wettermark B, et al. Most common diseases diagnosed in primary care in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011. Fam Pract. 2013;30:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, et al. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:769–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Pena R, Calvo-Lobo C, Aiguade R, et al. Which seems to be worst? Pain severity and quality of life between patients with lateral hip pain and low back pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:9156247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corniola MV, Stienen MN, Joswig H, et al. Correlation of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life with radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowen D, Zouraq IA, Chevrou-Severac H, et al. International regulations and recommendations for utility data for health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Health-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden. Health Policy. 2001;55:51–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson E, Hansson T. The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:329–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, et al. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:13–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg TK, Olsen JA, Ingebrigtsen T, et al. Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:1000–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1717–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan VA. National catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care. 2005;43:736–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, et al. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig BM, Pickard AS, Lubetkin EI. Health problems are more common, but less severe when measured using newer EQ-5D versions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene ME, Rader KA, Garellick G, et al. The EQ-5D-5L Improves on the EQ-5D-3L for health-related quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3383–3390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rencz F, Lakatos PL, Gulacsi L, et al. Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in patients with Crohn's disease. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poor AK, Rencz F, Brodszky V, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:3409–3419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen MF, Birnie E, Haagsma JA, et al. Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. Value Health. 2008;11:275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard AS, De Leon MC, Kohlmann T, et al. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Med Care. 2007;45:259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard AS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, et al. Evaluating equivalency between response systems: application of the Rasch model to a 3-level and 5-level EQ-5D. Med Care. 2007;45:812–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ); London: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg G, Lundquist A, Fjellman-Wiklund A, et al. Patterns of reported problems in women and men with back and neck pain: similarities and differences. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:668–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp. Released; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B, Linarce J. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrich DA. Category ordering and their utility. Rasch Meas Trans. 1996;9:464–465.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. What do infit and outfit. Mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Meas Trans. 2002;16:878.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A user´s guide to Winsteps® Ministep Rasch-model computer programs. 1991–2006. [cited 2018 Nov 3]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/B-001-003-730/page/n1
   Google Scholar
• Fisher W. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Meas Trans. 1992;6:238.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen R, Swerdlik M. Psychological testing and assessment. An introduction to tests and measurement. 7 ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Craig BM, Pickard AS, Rand-Hendriksen K. Do health preferences contradict ordering of EQ-5D labels? Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1759–1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrindell W, van der Ende J. An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9:165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre M. Winsteps Rasch Tutorial 3. [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2018 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com/a/winsteps-tutorial-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linarce J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:370.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg G. Physiotherapy in Västerbotten county. a survey study. Umeå: Västerbotten County Council; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Devlin N, Herdman M. Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz I, Janssen MF, Kohlmann T, et al. A systematic review of studies comparing the measurement properties of the three-level and five-level versions of the EQ-5D. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36:645–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar