References
- Smeets RJEM. It is time for using adequate assessment and new designs to improve the effectiveness of treatment in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Eur J Physiotherapy. 2013;15(4):166–167.
- Global Burden of Disease 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1603–1658.
- Suman A, Armijo-Olivo S, Deshpande S, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mass media campaigns for the management of low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;3:1–29
- Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–1571.
- Nicholas MK, Costa DSJ, Linton SJ, et al. Implementation of early intervention protocol in Australia for 'high risk' injured workers is associated with fewer lost work days over 2 years than usual (stepped) care. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(1):93–104.
- Van Erp R, Huijnen I, Köke A, et al. Feasibility of the biopsychosocial primary care intervention ‘Back on Track’ for patients with chronic low back pain: a process and effect-evaluation. Eur J Physiotherapy. 2020. DOI:10.1080/21679169.2020.1840627
- Linton SJ, Nicholas M, Shaw W. Why wait to address high-risk cases of acute low back pain? A comparison of stepped, stratified, and matched care. Pain. 2018;159(12):2437–2441.
- Wertli MM, Burgstaller JM, Weiser S, et al. Influence of catastrophizing on treatment outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine. 2014;39(3):263–273.
- Kongsted A, Kent P, Quicke JG, et al. Risk-stratified and stepped models of care for back pain and osteoarthritis: are we heading towards a common model? Pain Rep. 2020;5(5):e843.
- Borghuis EMC, Reneman MF, Schiphorst Preuper HR. Assessing discrepancies in outcomes of pain rehabilitation: “these questionnaires don't measure results that are relevant to me". Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(16):2374–2380.
- Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):164–179.
- Johnson AH, Cook BG. Preregistration in single-case design research. Except Child. 2019;86(1):95–112.
- Boutron I, Créquit P, Williams H, et al. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:135–142.
- Créquit P, Boutron I, Meerpohl J, et al. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:143–152.
- Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
- Ravaud P, Créquit P, Williams HC, et al. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:153–161.
- den Hollander M, Heijnders N, de Jong JR, et al. Exposure in vivo versus pain-contingent physical therapy in complex regional pain syndrome type I: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(4):400–409.
- Goossens ME, de Kinderen RJ, Leeuw M, et al. Is exposure in vivo cost-effective for chronic low back pain? A trial-based economic evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:549.
- De Vet HCW, Terluin B, Knol DL, et al. Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(1):37–45.