Concurrent validity and responsiveness of Traffic Light System-BasicADL (TLS-BasicADL)

References

• World Health Organization [Internet]. 2021. Healthy ageing. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/.
   Google Scholar
• Roaldsen KS, Halvarsson A, Sarlija B, et al. Self-reported function and disability in late life – cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Swedish version of the late-life function and disability instrument. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(10):813–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, et al. Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:4–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Herrin JS, et al. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal planning in stroke rehabilitation: how? Top Stroke Rehabil. 1999;6(2):16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron ID, Kurrle SE. 1: Rehabilitation and older people. Med J Aust. 2002;177(7):387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplin G, Kjellby-Wendt G, Fagevik Olsen M. TLS-BasicADL: development and reliability of a new assessment scale to measure basic mobility and self-care. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21(9):421–426.
   Google Scholar
• de Morton NA, Davidson M, Keating JL, et al. Validity, responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference for the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in an older acute medical population. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner C, Norman G. 2008. Health Measurement Scales – a practical guide to their developments and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt, et al. Methods to explain clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;4:728.
   Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;1:59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplin G, Carlsson G, Zidén L, et al. Early coordinated rehabilitation in acute phase after hip fracture – a model for increased patient participation. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonn U, Asberg KH. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly: a study of a population of 76 year olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(4):193–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wales K, Lannin NA, Clemson L, et al. Measuring functional ability in hospitalized older adults: a validation study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(16):1972–1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JW. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunally JC. 1970. Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Richards SH, Peters TJ, Coast J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse? Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(1):72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hseuh, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(8):526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnik JD. The early rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI). Rehabilitation. 2011;50(06):408–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50(2):177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollak N, Rheault W, Stoecker JL, et al. Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(10):1056–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler F, Dickson H, Redmond H, et al. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;45(4):479–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector WD, Takada HA. Characteristics of nursing homes that affect resident outcomes. J Aging Health. 1991;3(4):427–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brorsson B, Asberg KH. Katz Index of Independence in ADL: reliability and validity in short term care. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1984;16(3):125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1113–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:355–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18(5):377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplin G, Carlsson G, Fagevik Olsén M, et al. See me, teach me, guide me, but it’s up to me! Patients’ experiences of recovery during the acute phase after hip fracture. Eur J Physiother. 2019;1–9. DOI:10.1080/21679169.2019.1650394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg. 1992;5(5):682–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Horstmann V, Sonn U. Assessment of dependence in daily activities combined with a self-rating of difficulty. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archenholtz B, Dellhag B. Validity and reliability of the instrument Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL) and its clinical applicability to adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2008;15(1):13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar