Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors

References

• Nickerson RS. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods. 2000;5(2):241–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire APCF, Elkins MR, Ramos EM, et al. Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(4):302–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Uncertainty and sampling error. BMJ. 2014;349:g7064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett V. Comparative statistical inference. London, New York: Wiley; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Royall RM. Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. 1st ed. London, New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G. The empire of chance: how probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman SN, Royall R. Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(12):1568–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziliak S, McCloskey D. The cult of statistical significance: how the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. Corrupt research: the case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert RD. How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: continuous outcomes. Aust J Physiother. 2000;46(3):229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Elkins M, et al. Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84(7):644–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi D, Ma D, Li G, et al. Statistical use in clinical studies: is there evidence of a methodological shift? PLOS One. 2015;10(10):e0140159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond “p< 0.05. Am Stat. 2019;73(Suppl. 1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert RD. How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. II: dichotomous outcomes. Aust J Physiother. 2000;46(4):309–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Reid N. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. Phys Ther. 1999;79(2):186–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ. Disengaging from statistical significance. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(5):443–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming G. Multivariate applications series. New York: Routledge; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ. Showing confidence (intervals). Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(4):277–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ. Confidence intervals: linking evidence to practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(10):763–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G, et al. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(2):119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team 2019. RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, USA: RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira M. Research note: the smallest worthwhile effect of a health intervention. J Physiother. 2018;64(4):272–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. 2019;567(7748):305–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert R. Research note: significance testing and hypothesis testing: meaningless, misleading and mostly unnecessary. J Physiother. 2019;65(3):178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert RD, Jamtvedt G, Mead J, et al. Practical Evidence-Based physiotherapy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boos DD, Stefanski LA. P-Value precision and reproducibility. Am Stat. 2011;65(4):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein R, Lazar N. The ASA’s statement on p-Values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. ICMJE recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2013. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGough JJ, Faraone SV. Estimating the size of treatment effects: moving beyond p values. Psychiatry. 2009;6(10):21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayat MJ, Chandrasekhar R, Dietrich MS, et al. Moving otology beyond p< 0.05. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41:578–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat MJ, Staggs VS, Schwartz TA, et al. Moving nursing beyond p <.05. Res Nurs Health. 2019;42(4):244–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming G, Fidler F, Kalinowski P, et al. The statistical recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta‐analysis. Aust J Psychol. 2012;64(3):138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calin-Jageman RJ, Cumming G. Estimation for better inference in neuroscience. eNeuro. 2019;6(4):ENEURO.0205-19.2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber JB. New paradigms for considering statistical significance: a way forward for health services research journals, their authors, and their readership. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(4):591–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson RA, Rattner BA. Moving beyond p< 0.05 in ecotoxicology: a guide for practitioners. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020;39:1657–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RJ. P >. 05: the incorrect interpretation of “not significant” results is a significant problem. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020;172(4):521–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Sert NP, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, et al. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLOS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar