Remote physiotherapy in Finland—suitability, usability and factors affecting its use

References

• Hellstén T, Arokoski J, Sjögren T, et al. The current state of remote physiotherapy in Finland: cross-sectional web-based questionnaire study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;9(2):e35569. doi: 10.2196/35569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rausch A-K, Baur H, Reicherzer L, et al. Physiotherapists’ use and perceptions of digital remote physiotherapy during COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland: an online cross-sectional survey. Arch Physiother. 2021;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00112-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malliaras P, Merolli M, Williams C, et al. ‘It’s not hands-on therapy, so it’s very limited’: telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;52:102340. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT): Description of physical therapy Policy statement. 2019. [cited 2022 Oct 10]. Available from: https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2020-07/PS-2019-Description-of-physical-therapy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Association of Physiotherapists: The corecompetences of a physiotherapist. 2016 cited. 2022 Sept 19] Available from: https://www.suomenfysioterapeutit.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CoreCompetencies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davies L, Hinman RS, Russell T, et al. An international core capability framework for physiotherapists to deliver quality care via videoconferencing: a Delphi study. J Physiother. 2021;67(4):291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns RB, Crislip D, Daviou P, et al. Using telerehabilitation to support assistive technology. Assist Technol. 1998;10(2):126–133. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1998.10131970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Hiekkala S, Stenberg JH. Etäkuntoutus. Tampere: Juvenes Print; 2016, p. 11–12. ISBN 978-952-284-005-9
   Google Scholar
• Anttila M-R, Kivistö H, Piirainen A, et al. Cardiac rehabilitees’ technology experiences Before remote rehabilitation: qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e10985. doi: 10.2196/10985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala S, Kivistö H, Paajanen T, et al. Effectiveness of distance technology in promoting physical activity in cardiovascular disease rehabilitation: cluster randomized controlled trial, a pilot study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(2):e20299. doi: 10.2196/20299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hakala S, Rintala A, Immonen J, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity promoting technology-based distance interventions compared to usual care. Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(6):953–967. doi: 10.23736/s1973-9087.17.04585-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Grigsby D, et al. Telerehabilitation During the COVID-19 pandemic in outpatient rehabilitation settings: a descriptive study. Phys Ther. 2021;101(7):1–11. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley-Hague H, Lasrado R, Martinez E, et al. A scoping review of the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of physiotherapy delivered remotely. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2022;2:1–17. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2138574.
   Google Scholar
• Moffet H, Tousignant M, Nadeau S, et al. In-home telerehabilitation compared with face-to-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(14):1129–1141. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spindler H, Leerskov K, Joensson K, et al. Conventional rehabilitation therapy Versus telerehabilitation in cardiac patients: a comparison of motivation, psychological distress, and quality of life. IJERPH. 2019;16(3):512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner AP, Hartoonian N, Sloan AP, et al. Improving fatigue and depression in individuals with multiple sclerosis using telephone-administered physical activity counseling. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84(4):297–309. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rintala A, Paivarinne V, Hakala S, et al. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions for improving physical functioning in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(7):1339–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damhus CS, Emme C, Hansen H. Barriers and enablers of COPD telerehabilitation – a frontline staff perspective. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2473–2482. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S167501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell M, Judd P, Comans T, et al. Comparing fly-in fly-out and telehealth models for delivering advanced-practice physiotherapy services in regional Queensland: an audit of outcomes and costs. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(1):32–38. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19858036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, et al. Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Phys Ther. 2020;100(8):1260–1264. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranen K, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, et al. Toward patient-centered telerehabilitation design: understanding chronic pain patients’ preferences for web-based exercise telerehabilitation using a discrete choice experiment. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea MD. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahtio H, Rintala A, Immonen J, et al. The effectiveness of physical activity-promoting web- and mobile-based distance weight loss interventions on body composition in rehabilitation settings: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(3):e25906. doi: 10.2196/25906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Hoshino C, Yamaguchi R, et al. Remote rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(9):0. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwaa MN, Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, et al. The use of mobile and web-based applications to support rehabilitation after stroke: a scoping review. JRM. 2022;54:jrm00269. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.452.
   Google Scholar
• Levine M, Richardson JE, Granieri E, et al. Novel telemedicine technologies in geriatric chronic non-cancer pain: primary care providers’ perspectives. Pain Med. 2014;15(2):206–213. doi: 10.1111/pme.12323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Choi W, Lee K, et al. Virtual dual-task treadmill training using video recording for gait of chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12):3693–3697. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3693.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Russell TG. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102193. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Kasza J, et al. Physical therapists’ perceptions of telephone‐ and internet video–mediated service models for exercise management of people With osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70(3):398–408. doi: 10.1002/acr.23260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuitunen I, Artama M, Haapanen M, et al. Respiratory virus circulation in children after relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions in fall 2021 – a nationwide register study in Finland. J Med Virol. 2022;94(9):4528–4532. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren T, von Hedenberg L, Parikka E, et al. The core competences of Finnish physiotherapists in the light of research data. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:e28–e29. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.10.040.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(6):710–719. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Hiekkala S. Kokemuksia etäkuntoutuksesta. Kelan etäkuntoutushankkeen tuloksia. Helsinki: Erweko; 2019, p. 206–227. ISBN 978-952-284-066-0
   Google Scholar
• Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):310–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savolainen T, Partia R. Fysioterapianimikkeistö. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto; 2018. ISBN 978-952-293-579-3
   Google Scholar
• Truter P, Russell T, Fary R. The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(2):161–167. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odole AC, Afolabi KO, Ushie BA, et al. Views of physiotherapists from a low resource setting about physiotherapy at a distance: a qualitative study. Eur J Physiother. 2020;22(1):14–19. doi: 10.1080/21679169.2018.1549272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Chartered Society of Physiotheraphy. Understanding the opportunities and challenges of remote physiotherapy consultations and rehabilitation during the Covid-19 pandemic; 2021. [cited. 2023 Apr 24] Available from: https://www.csp.org.uk/system/files/documents/2022-2/csp_remote_pt_evaluation_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O'Leary SP, et al. Clinicians’ perspectives of a novel home-based multidisciplinary telehealth service for patients with chronic spinal pain. Int J Telerehabil. 2018;10(2):81–88. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2018.6249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastora-Bernal JM, Martín-Valero R, Barón-López FJ, et al. Evidence of benefit of telerehabitation after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e6836. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6836.
   Google Scholar
• Polastri M, Ciasca A, Nava S, et al. Two years of COVID-19: trends in rehabilitation. Pulmonology. 2022;20:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale-Gallardo JL, Kreider CM, Jia H, et al. Telerehabilitation for rural veterans: a qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators to implementation. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:559–570. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S247267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas CE, Durning SJ, Zebrowski C, et al. An interdisciplinary, multi-institution telehealth course for third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):833–837. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e8775. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar