Experimental study on using advance demand information to mitigate the bullwhip effect via decentralised negotiations

References

• Anderson, E. G., and D. J. Morrice. 2000. “A Simulation Game for Teaching Service-Oriented Supply Chain Management: Does Information Sharing Help Managers with Service Capacity Decisions?” Production and Operations Management 9 (1): 40–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00322.x
   Google Scholar
• Aviv, Y. 2003. “A Time-Series Framework for Supply Chain Inventory Management.” Operations Research 51 (2): 210–227. doi: 10.1287/opre.51.2.210.12780
   Google Scholar
• Baganha, M. P., and M. A. Cohen. 1998. “The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains.” Operations Research 46 (3): 572–583.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A. S. 1986. “Can the Production Smoothing Model of Inventory behavior be Saved?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (3): 431–453. doi: 10.2307/1885691
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Z. Drezner, J. Ryan, and D. Simchi-Levi. 2000. “Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.” Management Science 46 (3): 436–443. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., and R. Samroengraja. 2000. “The Stationary Beer Game.” Production and Operations Management 9 (1): 19–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00320.x
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., and K. Donohue. 2003. “Impact of POS Data Sharing on Supply Chain Management: An Experimental Study.” Production and Operations Management 12 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00194.x
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., and K. Donohue. 2005. “Upstream versus Downstream Information and its Impact on the Bullwhip Effect.” Systems Dynamics Review 21 (3): 249–260. doi: 10.1002/sdr.320
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., and K. Donohue. 2006. “Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information.” Management Science 52 (3): 323–336. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0436
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F. 2003. A Theory of Supply Chains. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F. 2004. “On the Stability of Supply Chains.” Operations Research 52 (6): 909–921. doi: 10.1287/opre.1040.0147
   Google Scholar
• Fiala, P. 2005. “Information Sharing in Supply Chains.” Omega 33 (5): 419–423. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. 1958. “Industrial Dynamics, a Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers.” Harvard Business Review 36 (4): 37–66.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaur, V., A. Giloni, and S. Seshadri. 2005. “Information Sharing in a Supply Chain under ARMA Demand.” Management Science 51 (6): 961–969. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0385
   Google Scholar
• Gavirneni, S., R. Kapuscinski, and S. Tayur. 1999. “Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains.” Management Science 45 (1): 16–24. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.1.16
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. 1976. “Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analyses of Research.” Educational Researcher 5: 3–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X005010003
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., and S. Franklin. 1994. “The Beer Distribution Game: Using Simulation to Teach Systems Thinking.” Journal of Management Development 13 (8): 7–15. doi: 10.1108/02621719410071937
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, C. H. 1956. Methods of Statistical Analysis, 50–55. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, R., and P. Zipkin. 1995. “Customer-Order Information, Leadtimes and Inventories.” Management Science 41 (10): 1599–1607. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.41.10.1599
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. C., F. Modigliani, J. Muth, and H. A. Simon. 1960. Planning Production, Inventories and Work Force. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, F. R. 2000. “Playing the Beer Distribution Game Over the Internet.” Production and Operations Management 9 (1): 31–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00321.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. E., and D. F. Pyke. 2000. Supply Chain Management: Innovations for Education. Miami, FL: Production and Operations Management Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. 1987. “Inventories and the Volatility of Production.” American Economic Review 77 (4): 667–679.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminsky, P., and D. Simchi-Levi. 1998. “The Computerized Beer Game: Teaching the Value of Integrated Supply Chain Management.” In Supply Chain and Technology Management, edited by Hau Lee and Shu Ming Ng. Miami, FL: Production and Operations Management Society, 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang. 1997. “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect.” Management Science 43 (4): 546–558. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L., K. C. So, and C. S. Tang. 2000. “The Value of Information Sharing in a Two Level Supply Chain.” Management Science 46 (5): 628–643. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J. F. 1956. “Guides to Inventory Policy, Part II - Problems of Uncertainty.” Harvard Business Review 34 (2): 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J. F., and D. Boodman. 1967. Production Planning and Inventory Control. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mehring, J. S. 2000. “A Practical Setting for Experiential Learning about Supply Chains: Siemens Brief Case Game Supply Chain Simulator.” Production and Operations Management 9 (1): 56–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2000.tb00323.x
   Google Scholar
• Naish, H. F. 1994. “Production Smoothing in the Linear Quadratic Inventory Model.” The Economic Journal 104 (425): 864–875. doi: 10.2307/2234980
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y. 2005. “System-Level Stability and Optimality of Decentralized Supply Chains.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y. 2007. “The Effect of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Stability and the Bullwhip Effect.” European Journal of Operational Research 182 (3): 1107–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.037
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y., and C. F. Daganzo. 2006a. “Characterization of the Bullwhip Effect in Linear, Time-Invariant Supply Chains: Some Formulae and Tests.” Management Science 52 (10): 1544–1556. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0573
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y., and C. F. Daganzo. 2006b. “Counteracting the Bullwhip Effect with Decentralized Negotiations and Advance Demand Information.” Physica A 363 (1): 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.01.044
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y., and C. F. Daganzo. 2008. “Robust Tests for the Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains with Stochastic Dynamics.” European Journal of Operational Research 185 (1): 340–353. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.046
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y., and X. Li. 2010. “The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chain Networks.” European Journal of Operational Research 201 (3): 799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.051
   Google Scholar
• Ramey, V. A. 1991. “Nonconvex Costs and the Behavior of Inventories.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (2): 306–334. doi: 10.1086/261752
   Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi, D., and Y. Zhao. 2003. “The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Stage Supply Chain with Production Capacity Constraint.” Naval Research Logistics 50 (8): 888–916. doi: 10.1002/nav.10094
   Google Scholar
• Steckel, J., S. Gupta, and A. Banerji. 2004. “Supply Chain Decision Making: Will Shorter Cycle Times and Shared Point-of-Sale Information Necessarily Help?” Management Science 50 (4): 458–464. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0169
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. 1989. “Modelling Managerial behaviour: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment.” Management Science 35 (3): 321–339. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.3.321
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. 1992. “Teaching Takes Off: Flight Simulators for Management Education” (OR/MS Today, October 1992).
   Google Scholar