Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index C_pk

References

• Aslam, M., M. Azam and C.-H. Jun, “Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41, 340–346 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-W. Wu, M. Azam and C.-H. Jun, “Variables sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 667–675 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-W. Wu, C.-H. Jun, M. Azam and N. Itay, “Developing a variables repetitive sampling plan based on Cpk with unknown mean and variance,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83, 1507–1517 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, D. H., “Double sampling plans for inspection by variables when the process standard deviation is unknown,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 9, 59–70 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and C. H. Jun, “Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 33, 327–338 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and C.-H. Jun, “Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data,” European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 1221–1230 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and C.-H. Jun, “Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 36, 1159–1172 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and M. Usha, “Optimal designing of variables quick switching variables sampling system by minimizing average sample number,” Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 19, 51–66 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and M. Usha, “Variables quick switching system with double specification limits,” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 19, 1250008-1-17 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. and M. Usha, “A new failure censored sampling system for Weibull distribution,” International Journal of Performability Engineering, 9, 3–12 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., C.-H. Jun and C. Il-Gyo, “A new hybrid reliability sampling system for exponential lifetime distributions,” Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 16, 365–375 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., H. Park, C. H. Jun, K. J. Kim and J. Lee, “Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number,” Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 34, 799–809 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn-Suhr, M. and W. Krumbholz, “A new variable sampling plan for normally distributed lots with unknown standard deviation and double specification limits,” Statistical Papers, 31, 195–207 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., S. W. Cheng and F. A. Spring, “A new measure of process capability: Cpm,” Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 162–175 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. J., Quality Control and Industrial Statistics. 5th ed., Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F., “A dual system of acceptance sampling,” Technical Report No.16, The Statistics Center, Rutgers – The State University, New Brunswick, NJ (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K. and S. Balamurali, “Chain sampling plan for variables inspection,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 103–109 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, H. C., “Acceptance sampling for percent defective by variables and by attributes,” Journal of Quality Technology, 11, 139–148 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiang, T. C. and G. Taguchi, “A tutorial on quality control and assurance – The Taguchi methods,” ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA(1985).
   Google Scholar
• Jun, C.-H., S. Balamurali and S.-H. Lee, “Variables sampling plans for Weibull distributed lifetimes under sudden death testing,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55, 53–58 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, V. E., “Process capability indices,” Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41–52, Corrigenda 265, (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S. and N. L. Johnson, “Process capability indices – A review, 1992–2000,” Journal of Quality Technology, 34, 2–19 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, G. J. and G. J. Resnikoff, “Sampling plans for inspection by variables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 72–75 (1955).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 6th Edition, John Wiley & sons, New York, NY (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet and E. Schechtman, “Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk,” Quality Engineering, 21, 306–318 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet and E. Schechtman, “Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk – Unknown variance,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27, 3–14 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J. and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York, NY (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D. B., “Variables sampling plans based on the normal distribution,” Technometrics, 9, 417–423 (1967).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L. and S. Kotz, Encyclopedia and Handbook of Process Capability Index: A Comprehensive Exposition of Quality Control Measures, World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L. and C. W. Wu, “An effective decision making method for product acceptance,” Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 35, 12–21 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romboski, L. D., An Investigation of Quick Switching Acceptance Sampling Systems, PhD Dissertation, Rutgers – The State University, New Brunswick, NJ, (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control, Marcel Dekker, New York (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, D. J., “Two-point double variables sampling plans,” Journal of Quality Technology, 13, 25–30 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V. and M. Palanivel, “Quick switching variables single sampling system indexed by AQL and LQL: Acceptance criterion tightening,” Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 6, 45–57 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Spiring, F. A., B. Leung, S. Cheng and A. Yeung, “A bibliography of process capability papers,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19, 445–460 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W. and W. L. Pearn, “A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination,” European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 549–560 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, B. J. and K. W. Kim, “A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27, 251–268 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar