Design of experiments for steady-state system identification with applications in genetic and business network modelinG

References

• Ambesi-Impiombato A, Bernardo D. Computational biology and drug discovery: from single-target to network drugs. Curr Bioinf. 2006;1:3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal M, Gatta GD, Di Bernardo D. Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso K, Margolin AA, Stolovitzky G, et al. Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37:382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haury A-C, Mordelet F, Vera-Licona P, et al. TIGRESS: trustful inference of gene regulation using stability selection. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6:145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamoto AH, Carvalho LF, Sampaio LDH, et al. Network anomaly detection system using genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;92:390–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombach A, Wotton KR, Cicin-Sain D, et al. Efficient reverse-engineering of a developmental gene regulatory network. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanighomi M, Zamanian M, Kimber M, et al. Gene regulatory network inference from perturbed time-series expression data via ordered dynamical expansion of non-steady state actors. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2018;15:1093–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo JH, Shimoni Y, Yang WS, et al. Elucidating compound mechanism of action by network perturbation analysis. Cell. 2015;162:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidis G. Autoregressive models for gene regulatory network inference: sparsity, stability and causality issues. Math Biosci. 2013;246:326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Zhou T. Structure identification for gene regulatory networks via linearization and robust state estimation. Automatica. 2014;50:2765–2776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner TS, Di Bernardo D, Lorenz D, et al. Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science. 2003;301:102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taslim C, Allen TT, Lauria M, et al. Sequential forward-inverse design for genetic network modeling. J Ind Prod Eng. 2017;34:520–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa GJ, de Leon N, Rosa AJ. Review of microarray experimental design strategies for genetical genomics studies. Physiol Genomics. 2006;28:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegner J, Yeung MS, Hasty J, et al. Reverse engineering gene networks: integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2003;100:5944–5949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fiksel J. Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:5330–5339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini S, Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE. A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2016;145:47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DD, Schenk J, Allen TT An initial comparison of selected models of system resilience. In: Resilience engineering perspectives, Volume 2. CRC Press; 2016. p. 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Amalberti R Optimum system safety and optimum system resilience: agonistic or antagonistic concepts? In: Resilience Engineering. CRC Press; 2017. p. 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Shi J. Stream of variation modeling and analysis for multistage manufacturing processes. CRC press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chen BM, Lin Z, Shamash Y. Linear systems theory: a structural decomposition approach. Springer Science & Business Media; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ljung L. System identification. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Arbib MA. System theory: a unified state-space approach to continuous and discrete systems. Saunders; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Ding Y, Chen Y, et al. Diagnosability study of multistage manufacturing processes based on linear mixed-effects models. Technometrics. 2003;45:312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hespanha JP. Linear systems theory. Princeton university press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Neubert MG, Caswell H. Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology. 1997;78:653–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal M, Belcastro V, Ambesi‐Impiombato A, et al. How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria M, Iorio F, dibernardo D. NIRest: a tool for gene network and mode of action inference. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1158:257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Hadj-Alouane A, Bean JC. A genetic algorithm for the multiple-choice integer program. Oper Res. 1997;45:92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TT, Bernshteyn M. Supersaturated designs that maximize the probability of identifying active factors. Technometrics. 2003;45:90–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response surfaces: designs and analyses. Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, et al. Applied linear statistical models. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Brualdi RA, Shader BL. Matrices of sign-solvable linear systems. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman G. Monte Carlo: concepts, algorithms, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cox RS, Surette MG, Elowitz MB. Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of biochemistry absolute ultimate. WH Freeman; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, et al. COPASI—a complex pathway simulator. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:3067–3074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkel JG. The efficiencies of fractional factorial designs. Technometrics. 2005;47:488–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar