Cyber supply chain risk management and performance in industry 4.0 era: information system security practices in Malaysia

References

• Beaulieu M, Bentahar O. Digitalization of the healthcare supply chain: a roadmap to generate benefits and effectively support healthcare delivery. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2021;167:120717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Bui TD, Lim MK, et al. Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;245:108401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Wahyuni-T.D IS, Gui A, et al. A mixed-method study on the barriers of industry 4.0 adoption in the Indonesian SMEs manufacturing supply chains. J Sci Technol Policy Manage. 2022a; ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/JSTPM-10-2021-0155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelar-Sosa L, García-Alcaraz JL, Castrellón-Torres JP. The effects of some risk factors in the supply chains performance: a case of study. J Appl Res Technol. 2014;12(5):958–968.
   Google Scholar
• Linton JD, Boyson S, Aje J. The challenge of cyber supply chain security to research and practice – an introduction. Technovation. 2014;34(7):339–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YL, Huang L, Yan W, et al. Privacy in AI and the IoT: the privacy concerns of smart speaker users and the personal information protection law in China. Telecommun Policy. 2022;46(7):102334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist SA. Why firms implement risk governance – stepping beyond traditional risk management to enterprise risk management. J Accounting Public Policy. 2015;34(5):441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Dias D, Maqueira JM, Moyano-Fuentes J. The link between information and digital technologies of industry 4.0 and agile supply chain: mapping current research and establishing new research avenues. Comput Ind Eng. 2022;108000.
   Google Scholar
• Boyson S. Cyber supply chain risk management: revolutionising the strategic control of critical IT systems. Technovation. 2014;34(7):342–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng D, Lai KH, Zhu Q. Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Int J Prod Econ. 2021;231:107869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui TD, Tseng ML. A data driven analysis on sustainable energy security: challenges and opportunities in world regions. J Global Inf Manage. 2022;30(6):1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FTS, Qi HJ, Chan HK, et al. A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Manage Decis. 2003;41(7):635–642.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Tran TPT, Ha HM, et al. Sustainable industrial and operation engineering trends and challenges towards Industry 4.0: a data driven analysis. J Ind Prod Eng. 2021;38(8):8, 581–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells LJ, Camelio JA, Williams CB, et al. Cyber-physical security challenges in manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett. 2014;2(2):74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung KF, Bell MG, Bhattacharjya J. Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: an overview and future research directions. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2021;146:102217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss MD, Whipple JM, Closs DJ. The role of strategic security: internal and external security measures with security performance implications. Transp J. 2009;48(2):5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrani PM, Manap NA, Taji H. Cyber terrorism challenges: the need for a global response to a multi-jurisdictional crime. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2013;29(3):207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsias J, Ahmad A, Scheepers R. Adopting and integrating cyber-threat intelligence in a commercial organisation. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;1–17. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2088414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh AD, Kalpana P. Future of artificial intelligence and its influence on supply chain risk management–A systematic review. Comput Ind Eng. 2022;108206.
   Google Scholar
• Rozhkov M, Ivanov D, Blackhurst J, et al. Adapting supply chain operations in anticipation of and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Omega (Westport). 2022;110:102635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo SY, Kim KK. The impact of knowledge complementarities on supply chain performance through knowledge exchange. Expert Syst Appl. 2015;42(6):3029–3040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadiq M, Alajlani S, Hussain MS, et al. Impact of credit, liquidity, and systematic risk on financial structure: comparative investigation from sustainable production. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(14):20963–20975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gligor DM, Esmark CL, Holcomb MC. Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: when should you be agile? J Oper Manage. 2015;33–34(1):71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corallo A, Lazoi M, Lezzi M, et al. Cybersecurity awareness in the context of the industrial internet of things: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind. 2022;137:103614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazancoglu I, Ozbiltekin-Pala M, Mangla SK, et al. Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19. J Clean Prod. 2022;132431.
   Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel MJ, Suresh NC The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. J Oper Manage. 2009;27(2):119–140. DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J. Supply chain agility: securing performance for Chinese manufacturers. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;150:104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang HH, Wong KH, Chiu WS. The effects of business systems leveraging on supply chain performance: process innovation and uncertainty as moderators. Inf Manage. 2019;56(6):103140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn SH, Yang MG, Kim JH, et al. Supply chain information capabilities and performance outcomes: an empirical study of Korean steel suppliers. Inter J Inf Manage. 2014;34(3):369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon S, Klassen RD. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;111(2):299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengarajan S, Narayanamurthy G, Moser R, et al. Data strategies for global value chains: hybridization of small and big data in the aftermath of COVID-19. J Bus Res. 2022;144:776–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover AK, Dresner M. A theoretical model on how firms can leverage political resources to align with supply chain strategy for competitive advantage. J Supp Chain Manage. 2022;58(2):48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solak S, Zhuo Y. Optimal policies for information sharing in information system security. Eur J Oper Res. 2020;284(3):934–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manupati VK, Schoenherr T, Ramkumar M, et al. Recovery strategies for a disrupted supply chain network: leveraging blockchain technology in pre-and post-disruption scenarios. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;245:108389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Halili M, Tseng ML, et al. Sustainable social supply chain practices and firm social performance: framework and empirical evidence. Sustainable Production and Consumption; 2022b.
   Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R, Talluri S. Perspectives on risk management in supply chains. J Oper Manage. 2009;27(2):114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyson S, Corsi T, Rossman H. Building a cyber supply chain assurance reference model. Sci Appl Int Corporation (SAIC). 2009 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.1516&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jallali S, Zoghlami F. Does risk governance mediate the impact of governance and risk management on banks’ performance? Evidence from a selected sample of Islamic banks. J Financ Regul Compliance. 2022;30(4):439–464. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt MA, Fainshmidt S, Aguilera RV. Our board, our rules: nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Adm Sci Q. 2022;67(1):131–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shou Y, Shan X, Li L. The roles of JIT supply chain practices in new product ramp-up: the moderating effects of IT integration. Int J Logistics Res Appl. 2022;1–18. DOI:10.1080/13675567.2022.2026904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluyisola OE, Bhalla S, Sgarbossa F, et al. Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33(1):311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharub M, Mor RS, Rana S. Mediating role of manufacturing strategy in the competitive strategy and firm performance: evidence from SMEs. Benchmarking: Int J. 2022; ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2021-0257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymarczyk J. The change in the traditional paradigm of production under the influence of industrial revolution 4.0. Businesses. 2022;2(2):188–200.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Abideen AZ, Shaharudin MS. The nexus of information sharing, technology capability and inventory efficiency. J Global Oper Strategic Sourcing. 2020;33(4):327–351.
   Google Scholar
• Di Ciccio C, Meroni G, Plebani P. On the adoption of blockchain for business process monitoring. Software Syst Model. 2022;1–23 doi:10.1007/s10270-021-00959-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey RG, Roath AS, Adams FG, et al. A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. J Bus Logist. 2022;43(1):62–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Ahmad Jasmi MF, Wahyuni-TD IS, et al. Supply chain integration and halal frozen meat product returns. J Islamic Marketing. 2022c; ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/JIMA-05-2021-0144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar P, Osburg VS, Kabra G, et al. Coordination and collaboration for humanitarian operational excellence: big data and modern information processing systems. Prod Plann Control. 2022;33(6–7):705–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikas I, Sundarakani B, Shehabeldin M. Big data utilisation and its effect on supply chain resilience in Emirati companies. Int J Logistics Res Appl. 2022;1–25. DOI:10.1080/13675567.2022.2052825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Budhwar P, Dey PK, et al. AI-employee collaboration and business performance: integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework. J Bus Res. 2022;144:31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son J-Y Out of fear or desire? Toward a better understanding of employees’ motivation to follow is security policies. Information & Management. 2011;48(7):296–302. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D-L, Patrick Rau P-L, Salvendy G, et al. Factors affecting perception of information security and their impacts on IT adoption and security practices. Inter J Human Comp Stud. 2011;69(12):870–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner SM, Bode C. An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. J Bus Logist. 2008;29(1):307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir O, Erkmen E. Top management team gender diversity and firm risk-taking in the hospitality industry. Int J Contemp Hosp Manage. 2022;34(5):1739–1767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira JV. The new supply chain’s frontier: information management. Inter J Inf Manage. 2009;29(5):372–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forza C. Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2002;22(2):152–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JJF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, et al. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal. 2017;1(2):107–123.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroote SE, Marx TG The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Inter J Inf Manage. 2013;33(6):909–916. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merschmann U, Thonemann UW Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: An empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;130(1):43–53. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay D, Thompsom R, Higgins C. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use an illistration. Technol Stud. 1995;2(2):285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Huo B, Zhang C, Zhao X. The effect of IT and relationship commitment on supply chain coordination: a contingency and configuration approach. Inf Manage. 2015;52(6):728–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights: MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Li G, Zhang H, et al. Firm performance and marketing analytics in the Chinese context: a contingency model. J Bus Res. 2022;141:589–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maingot M, Quon T, Zéghal D. An analysis of the effects of the financial crisis on enterprise risk management in the Canadian financial sector. J Financ Risk Perspect. 2014;3(2):10–26.
   Google Scholar
• van Der Vegt RG. Risk management and risk governance of liquefied natural gas development in Gladstone, Australia. Extr Ind Soc. 2019;6(1):58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Dang CN, Le-Hoai L, Peansupap V. Linking knowledge enabling factors to organizational performance: empirical study of project-based firms. Int J Constr Manage. 2022;22(3):527–540.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manage. 2010;28(1):58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shee H, Miah SJ, Fairfield L, et al. The impact of cloud-enabled process integration on supply chain performance and firm sustainability: the moderating role of top management. Supply Chain Manage. 2018;23(6):500–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Xue J, Li N, et al. Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2022;163:102773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai EWT, Chau DCK, Chan TLA. Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: findings from case studies. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2011;20(3):232–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meland PH, Nesheim DA, Bernsmed K, et al. Assessing cyber threats for storyless systems. J Inf Secur Appl. 2022;64:103050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael P. The nature of risk: the risk management of everythingnull. Balance Sheet. 2004;12(5):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pn S. Impact of information security initiatives on supply chain performance: an empirical investigation. Inf Manage Computer Security. 2014;22(5):450–473.
   Google Scholar
• Seiger R, Malburg L, Weber B, et al. Integrating process management and event processing in smart factories: a systems architecture and use cases. J Manuf Syst. 2022;63:575–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermias J, Fu Y, Fu C, et al. Budgetary control and risk management institutionalization: a field study of three state-owned enterprises in China. J Accounting Organizational Change. 2022; ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI:10.1108/JAOC-06-2021-0086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Rozuar NHM, Mergeresa F. The blockchain-enabled technology and carbon performance: insights from early adopters. Technol Soc. 2021;64:101507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Tseng ML, Aziz N, et al. Waste-to-energy supply chain management on circular economy capability: an empirical study. Sustainable Prod Consumption. 2022d;31:26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao T, Tobias S. Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Manage. 2011;16(6):474–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar