A practical guide on strategic roadmapping for information and operations technology management: a case study on industry 5.0 transformation

References

• Park H, Phaal R, Ho J-Y, et al. Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: a school of thought perspective. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2020;154:119965. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaal R, Muller G. An architectural framework for roadmapping: towards visual strategy. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2009;76(1):39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr C, Phaal R. Roadmapping and roadmaps: definition and underpinning concepts. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2021;69(1):6–16. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3096012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daim TU, Yoon B-S, Lindenberg J, et al. Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: a multicriteria technology assessment. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2018;131:49–66. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas JS, de Oliveira MG, Bagno RB, et al. A bottom-up strategic roadmapping approach for multilevel integration and communication. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2020;69(1):81–93. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3037189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaal R, Farrukh CJ, Probert DR. Strategic roadmapping: a workshop-based approach for identifying and exploring strategic issues and opportunities. Eng Manage J. 2007;19(1):3–12. doi: 10.1080/10429247.2007.11431716
   Google Scholar
• Abe H, Ashiki T, Suzuki A, et al. Integrating business modeling and roadmapping methods–the innovation support technology (IST) approach. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2009;76(1):80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebelink R, Hofman E, Halman JI, et al. Roadmapping:(Missed) opportunities to overcome strategic challenges. Bus Horiz. 2021;64(4):501–512. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng M, Wong JW, Cheung CF, et al. A scenario-based roadmapping method for strategic planning and forecasting: a case study in a testing, inspection and certification company. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2016;111:44–62. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnevskiy K, Karasev O, Meissner D. Integrated roadmaps for strategic management and planning. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2016;110:153–166. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahumada-Tello E, Ovalle-Osuna OO, Evans RD (2023). Strategic roadmapping for technological change. In IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Body of Knowledge (TEMSBOK) (pp. 53–67).
   Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Morales ME, et al. Actions and approaches for enabling industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: a strategy roadmap. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manage. 2023a;30(3):1473–1494. doi: 10.1002/csr.2431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B, et al. Industry 5.0 implications for inclusive sustainable manufacturing: an evidence-knowledge-based strategic roadmap. J Clean Prod. 2023b;417:138023. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B, et al. Industry 4.0 digital transformation and opportunities for supply chain resilience: a comprehensive review and a strategic roadmap. Production Planning & Control. 2023c;1–31. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2023.2252376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira MG, Freitas JS, Pereira BS, et al. Exploring the involvement of experts in strategic roadmapping with large groups. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2020;69(1):56–66. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3026936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr C. The systems approach of strategic roadmapping: framing challenges and contributions whilst flexing to changing conditions and circumstances. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2023;40(4):701–712. doi: 10.1002/sres.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho GM, Galvão ACF, Guedes AC, et al. Strategic foresight applied to the management plan of an innovation development agency. Technology Analysis And Strategic Management. 2012;24(3):267–283. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.655412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Mubarak MF, et al. Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: a strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Prod Consumption. 2022;33:716–737. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotta M, Nugroho R, Hurlstone MJ, et al. Analyzing social media data: a mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behav Res. 2019;51(4):1766–1781. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01202-8
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor IK. A survey of dimension reduction techniques. 2002. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2877.
   Google Scholar
• Chejarla KC, Vaidya OS, Kumar S. MCDM applications in logistics performance evaluation: a literature review. Multi Criteria Decision Anal. 2022;29(3–4):274–297. doi: 10.1002/mcda.1774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh AR, Qazi AA, Appolloni A. Identification and evaluation of the contextual relationship among barriers to the circular supply chain in the Pakistani context–an interpretive structural modelling approach. Prod Plann Control. 2022;1–16. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2022.2159896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching NT, Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, et al. Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: a systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 2022;334:130133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput S, Singh SP. Identifying industry 4.0 IoT enablers by integrated PCA-ISM-DEMATEL approach. Manage Decis. 2019;57(8):1784–1817. doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2018-0378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raut RD, Priyadarshinee P, Gardas BB, et al. Analyzing the factors influencing cloud computing adoption using three stage hybrid SEM-ANN-ISM (SEANIS) approach. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2018;134:98–123. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena J, Sidharth S, Thakur LS, et al. Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM): approach and application. JAMR. 2017;14(2):162–181. doi: 10.1108/JAMR-10-2016-0087
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Seth N. Analysis of supply chain resilience barriers in Indian automotive company using total interpretive structural modelling. JAMR. 2021;18(5):758–781. doi: 10.1108/JAMR-08-2020-0190
   Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Grybauskas A, et al. Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: a systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strat Environ. 2021;30(8):4237–4257. doi: 10.1002/bse.2867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal A, Harper FM, Konstan JA. Exploring question selection bias to identify experts and potential experts in community question answering. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2012;30(2):1–28. doi: 10.1145/2180868.2180872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt WP, Gardner DC, Haeffele LM, et al. Selecting the right analyses for your data: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. New York, USA: Guilford Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gadekar R, Sarkar B, Gadekar A. Model development for assessing inhibitors impacting industry 4.0 implementation in Indian manufacturing industries: an integrated ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2022;15(2):1–26. doi: 10.1007/s13198-022-01691-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CJ, Whittaker TA, Boyle LH, et al. Quantitative approaches to group research: suggestions for best practices. J Spec Group Work. 2017;42(1):3–16. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2016.1264520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddikunta PKR, Pham Q-V, Prabadevi B, et al. Industry 5.0: a survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. J Ind Inf Integr. 2022;26:100257. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Wang B, Li X, et al. Industry 5.0 and society 5.0—comparison, complementation and co-evolution. J Manuf Syst. 2022;64:424–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis EG, Morawska-Jancelewicz J. The futures of Europe: society 5.0 and industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. J Knowl Econ. 2022;13(4):3445–3471. doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov D. The industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. Int J P Res. 2023;61(5):1683–1695. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISMA (2023), Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, available at http://www.prisma-statement.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gagnidze I. Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0: can clusters deal with the challenges? (A systemic approach). Kybernetes. 2023;52(7):2270–2287. doi: 10.1108/K-07-2022-1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee AA, Raj A, Aggarwal S. Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies. Int J Prod Econ. 2023;257:108770. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Sehrawat R, Luthra S, et al. Moving towards industry 5.0 in the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector: challenges and solutions for Germany. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2022;1–18. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3143466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi A, Agrawal D, Jha A, et al. Studying the interactions among industry 5.0 and circular supply chain: towards attaining sustainable development. Comput Ind Eng. 2023;176:108927. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh R. Industry 5.0: analyzing the challenges in implementation using grey influence analysis. J Enterp Inf Manage. 2023;36(5):1349–1371. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2023-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmaker CL, Bari AM, Anam MZ, et al. Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. Int J Prod Econ. 2023;258:108806. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-Heuser B, et al. Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0—inception, conception and perception. J Manuf Syst. 2021;61:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piprani AZ, Jaafar NI, Mohezar Ali S. Prioritizing resilient capability factors of dealing with supply chain disruptions: an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application in the textile industry. Benchmarking: Int J. 2020;27(9):2537–2563. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2019-0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M. Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. Int J P Res. 2020;58(8):2384–2405. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1630775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stentoft J, Adsbøll Wickstrøm K, Philipsen K, et al. Drivers and barriers for industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Prod Plann Control. 2021;32(10):811–828. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Dora M, Hezarkhani B, et al. Lean and industry 4.0: mapping determinants and barriers from a social, environmental, and operational perspective. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2022;175:121320. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein-Pensel F, Winkler H, Brückner A, et al. Maturity assessment for industry 5.0: a review of existing maturity models. J Manuf Syst. 2023;66:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar