Study on neurodegeneration at different stages using MR images: computational approach to registration process with optimisation techniques

References

• Andresen PR, Nielsen M. 2001. Non-rigid registration by geometry-constrained diffusion?. Med Image Anal. 5(2):81–88. doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00036-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya M, Das A. 2007. Multi-resolution medical image registration using maximization of mutual information & optimization by genetic algorithm, Proceedings of IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium/ Medical Imaging Conference (IEEE NSS/MIC-07), in Honolulu, USA by IEEE Nuclear Science Society, pp. 2961–2964, 28th Oct–3rd Nov, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya M, Dutta Majumder D. 2000. Registration of CT and MR images of Alzheimer's patient: a shape theoretic approach. Pattern Recognit Lett. 21(6–7):531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown L. 1992. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput Surv. 24(4):325–376, doi:10.1145/146370.146374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo A, Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wilson DL. 2000. Semiautomatic 3D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging. 19(3):175–185, doi:10.1109/42.845176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao Lu C, Chelikani S, Jaffray DA, Milosevic MF, Staib LH, Duncan JS. 2012. Simultaneous nonrigid registration, segmentation, and tumor detection in MRI guided cervical cancer radiation therapy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 31(6):1213–1227, doi:10.1109/TMI.2012.2186976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G. 1995. Automated multimodality image registration using information theory. In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, editors. Information processing in medical imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Das A, Bhattacharya M. 2011. Affine-based registration of ct and mr modality images of human brain using multiresolution approaches: comparative study on genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Int J Neural Comput Appl. 20(2):223–237, doi:10.1007/s00521-010-0374-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Goshtasby A, Satter M. 2001. Volume image registration by template matching. Image and Vision Computing. 19(12):821–832, doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(00)00101-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt E, Werner W, Schmidt-Richberg S-R, Handels H. 2011. Statistical modeling of 4D respiratory lung motion using diffeomorphic image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 30(2):251–265, doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2076299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbe H, Kriete A, Jödicke A, Deinsberger W, Böker D. 1996. 3D-ultrasonography and image matching for detection of brain shift during intracranial surgery. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, editors. Computer assisted radiology, volume 1124 of Excerpta medica – international congress series. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 225–230  1124.
   Google Scholar
• Erdi YE, Rosenzweig K, Erdi AK, Macapinlac HA, Hu Y-C, Braban LE, Humm JL, Squire OD, Chui C-S, Larson SM, Yorke ED. 2002. Radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer using positron emission tomography (PET). Radiotherapy and Oncology. 62(1):51–60, doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00470-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang S, Raghavan R, Richtsmeier JT. 1996. Volume morphing methods for landmark based 3D image deformation. In: Loew MH, Hanson KM, editors. Medical imaging: image processing. Vol. 2710. Bellingham, WA: SPIE; p. 404–415.
   Google Scholar
• Fei B, Wheaton A, Lee Z, Duerk JL, Wilson DL. 2002. Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 47(5):823–838, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/47/5/309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Qingming H, Wen G. 2006. Image matching by normalized cross-correlation. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana F, Crovetto A, Bergognoni M, Casali AM. 1993. Multiresolution registration for volume reconstruction in microscopical applications. In: Loew MH, editor. Medical imaging: image processing. Vol. 1898. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press; p. 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gigengack G, Ruthotto R, Burger B, Wolters CH, Xiaoyi Jiang X, Schäfers KP. 2012. Motion correction in dual gated cardiac PET using mass-preserving image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 31(3):698–712, doi:10.1109/TMI.2011.2175402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granville V, Krivanek M, Rasson J-P. 1994. Simulated annealing: A proof of convergence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 16(6):652–656, doi:10.1109/34.295910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Crossman JE, Gleeson MJ, Cox TCS, Bracey EECML, Strong AJ, Graves P. 1991. Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features. Brit J Radiol. 64(767):1030–1035, doi:10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn J-F, Habert M-O, Kas A, Malek Z, Maksud P, Lacomblez L, Giron A, Fertil B. 2009. Differential automatic diagnosis between Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia based on perfusion SPECT images. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 47(2):147–158, doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2009.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke AL, Zubicaray G, Rose SE, Griffin M, Chalk JB, Galloway GJ. 2001. 4D deformation modeling of cortical disease progression in Alzheimer's dementia. Magn Reson Med. Octhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1243 46(4):661–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. 2002. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage. 17(2):825–841, doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagadis GC, Delibasis KK, Matsopoulos GK, Mouravliansky NA, Asvestas PA, Nikiforidis GC. 2002. A comparative study of surface- and volume-based techniques for the automatic registration between CT and SPECT brain images. Med Phys. 29(2):201–213, doi:10.1118/1.1445412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linte CA, White J, Eagleson R, Guiraudon GM, Peters TM. 2010. Virtual and augmented medical imaging environments: enabling technology for minimally invasive cardiac interventional guidance. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 3:25–47, doi:10.1109/RBME.2010.2082522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. 1997. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 16(2):187–198, doi:10.1109/42.563664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P. 1999. Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal. 3(4):373–386, doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(99)80030-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maguire GQ, Noz M, Rusinek H, Jaeger J, Kramer EL, Sanger JJ, Smith G. 1991. Graphics applied to medical image registration. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl. 11(2):20–28, doi:10.1109/38.75587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra M, Ying Sun S. 2012. Integrating segmentation information for improved mrf-based elastic image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process. 21(1):170–183, doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2162738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. 1998. A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal. 2(1):1–36, doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80026-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer M, Zimmerman-Moreno Z-M, Shadmi S, Batikoff B, Greenspan G. 2011. A supervised framework for the registration and segmentation of white matter fiber tracts. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 30(1):131–145, doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2067222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire M, Stone HS. 2000. Techniques for multiresolution image registration in the presence of occlusions. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 38(3):1476–1479, doi:10.1109/36.843046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine K, Benzinou A, Fablet R. 2013. Geodesics-based image registration: applications to biological and medical images depicting concentric ring patterns. IEEE Trans Image Process. 22(11):4436–4446, doi:10.1109/TIP.2013.2273670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluim P, Maintz W, Viergever JBA, Viergever MA. 2003. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 22(8):986–1004, doi:10.1109/TMI.2003.815867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radau PE, Slomka PJ, Julin P, Svensson L, Wahlund L-O. 2001. Evaluation of linear registration algorithms for brain SPECT and the errors due to hypoperfusion lesions. Medical Physics. 28(8):1660–1668, doi:10.1118/1.1388894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfing T, Russakoff DB, Denzler J, Mori K, Maurer, Jr, CR. 2005. Progressive attenuation fields: fast 2D-3D image registration without precomputation. Med Phys. 32(9):2870–2880, doi:10.1118/1.1997367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet JM, Jacq JJ, Roux C. 2000. Genetic algorithms for a robust 3-D MR-CT registration. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 4(2):126–136, doi:10.1109/4233.845205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffi J, Mahraz MA, Tairi H. 2013. Medical image registration based on fast and adaptive bidimensional empirical mode decomposition. IET Image Process. 7(6):567–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell S, Norvig P. 2003. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 2nd ed.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 1996. Incorporating connected region labelling into automated image registration using mutual information. In: Mathematical methods in biomedical image analysis. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; p. 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Mamede M, Tuncali K, Shyn PB, Silverman SG. 2010. Abdominal masses sampled at PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: initial experience with registration of prior PET/CT images. Radiology. 256(1):305–311, doi:10.1148/radiol.10090931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola P. 1995. Alignment by maximisation of mutual information. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Technical Report No. 1548. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Widmann G, Stoffner R, Sieb M, Bale R. 2009. Target registration and target positioning errors in computer-assisted neurosurgery: proposal for a standardized reporting of error assessment. Int J Med Robot. 5(4):355–365, doi:10.1002/rcs.271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhou X, Sun J, Zhang J. 2005. A novel medical image registration method based on mutual information and genetic algorithm. IEEE Proceedings of the Computer Graphics, Imaging and Vision (CGIV).
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y-M, Cochoff SM. 2002. Influence of implementation parameters on registration of MR and SPECT brain images by maximization of mutual information. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 43(2):160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubal IG, Spencer SS, Khurseed Imam JS, Smith EO, Wisniewski G, Hoffer PB. 1995. Difference images calculated from ictal and interictal technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT scans of epilepsy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 36(4):684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar