Comparison of anatomical parameters of cam femoroacetabular impingement to evaluate hip joint models segmented from CT data

References

• Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Waarsing JH. 2012. Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK). Ann Rheum Dis. 72:918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen D, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. 2009. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91:589–594.10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alonso-Rasgado T, Jimenez-Cruz D, Bailey CG, Mandal P, Board T. 2012. Changes in the stress in the femoral head neck junction after osteochondroplasty for hip impingement: a finite element study. J Orthop Res. 30:1999–2006.10.1002/jor.v30.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbabi E, Chegini S, Boulic R, Tannast M, Ferguson SJ, Thalmann D. 2010. Penetration depth method–novel real-time strategy for evaluating femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 28:880–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneron L, Pattyn C. 2011a. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 40:921–927.10.1007/s00256-010-1021-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audenaert EA, Mahieu P, Pattyn C. 2011b. Three-dimensional assessment of cam engagement in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 27:167–171.10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardakos NV, Villar RN. 2009. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91:162–169.10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaulé PE. 2011. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:464–469.10.1007/s11999-010-1624-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulé P, Hynes K, Parker G, Kemp K. 2012. Can the alpha angle assessment of cam impingement predict acetabular cartilage delamination? Clin Orthop Rel Res. 470:3361–3367.10.1007/s11999-012-2601-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. 2005. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 23:1286–1292.10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, Kelly BT. 2011. Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 27:235–251.10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1:307–310.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. 1990. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 20:337–340.10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. 2003. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 22:85–93.10.1002/(ISSN)1469-0705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botser IB, Ozoude GC, Martin DE, Siddiqi AJ, Kuppuswami S, Domb BG. 2012. Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Arthroscopy. 28:619–627.10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadet ER, Babatunde OM, Gorroochurn P, Chan AK, Stancato-Pasik A, Brown M, Johnson S, Kaiser PB, Gardner TR, Ayeni OR. 2016. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) parameters comparing plain radiographs and advanced, 3D computed tomographic (CT)-generated hip models in a surgical patient cohort. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 24:2324–2331.10.1007/s00167-014-3315-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraverty JK, Sullivan C, Gan C, Narayanaswamy S, Kamath S. 2013. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: CT findings of features resembling femoroacetabular impingement in a young population without symptoms. Am J Roentgenol. 200:389–395.10.2214/AJR.12.8546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chegini S, Beck M, Ferguson SJ. 2009. The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Res. 27:195–201.10.1002/jor.v27:2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachli W, Islam SU, Liu M, Richards R, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J. 2009. Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91:1031–1036.10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachli W, Ul Islam S, Tippett R, Hall-Craggs MA, Witt JD. 2011. Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements. Skeletal Radiol. 40:877–883.10.1007/s00256-010-1065-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sa D, Urquhart N, Philippon M, Ye JE, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. 2014. Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 22:812–821.10.1007/s00167-013-2678-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch T, Werlen S, Beck M. 2009. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:651–659.10.1007/s11999-008-0617-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed N, Ganz R. 2001. Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 11:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ejnisman L, Philippon M, Lertwanich P, Pennock A, Herzog M, Briggs K, Ho C. 2013. Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Orthopedics. 36:e293–e300.10.3928/01477447-20130222-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. 2003. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 417:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Abrams GD, Nho SJ. 2014. What’s new in femoroacetabular impingement surgery: will we be better in 2023? Sports Health. 6:162–170.10.1177/1941738113513006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. 2010. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92:2436–2444.10.2106/JBJS.J.01280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MD, Datar M, Whitaker RT, Jurrus ER, Peters CL, Anderson AE. 2013a. Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 31:1620–1626.10.1002/jor.22389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MD, Kapron AL, Peters CL, Anderson AE. 2014. Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol. 83:788–796.10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MD, Reese SP, Peters CL, Weiss JA, Anderson AE. 2013b. Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Ann Biomed Eng. 41:1162–1171.10.1007/s10439-013-0762-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartofilakidis G, Bardakos NV, Babis GC, Georgiades G. 2011. An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 93:580–586.10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellwig FL, Tong J, Hussell JG. 2016. Hip joint degeneration due to cam impingement: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19:41–48.10.1080/10255842.2014.983490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge JP, Simoes FM, Pires EB, Rego PA, Tavares DG, Lopes DS, Gaspar A. 2014. Finite element simulations of a hip joint with femoroacetabular impingement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 17:1275–1284.10.1080/10255842.2012.744398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KA, Restrepo C, Hellman M, AbdelSalam H, Morrison W, Parvizi J. 2011. The prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in asymptomatic adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 93:1303–1307.10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.26433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang AC, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J. 2010. Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 38:1160–1165.10.1177/0363546509358320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappe T, Kocak T, Reichel H, Fraitzl CR. 2012. Can femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia be distinguished by clinical presentation and patient history? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 20:387–392.10.1007/s00167-011-1553-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapron AL, Anderson AE, Aoki SK, Phillips LG, Petron DJ, Toth R, Peters CL. 2011. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 93:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Konan S, Rayan F, Haddad FS. 2010. Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 92:47–50.10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamontagne M, Kennedy MJ, Beaulé PE. 2009. The effect of cam FAI on hip and pelvic motion during maximum squat. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:645–650.10.1007/s11999-008-0620-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. 1989. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med. 19:61–70.10.1016/0010-4825(89)90036-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. 2011. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:188–199.10.1007/s11999-010-1447-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monazzam S, Bomar JD, Agashe M, Hosalkar HS. 2013. Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 471:1639–1645.10.1007/s11999-012-2708-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Clohisy JC. 2012. Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 470:3313–3320.10.1007/s11999-012-2510-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KCG, Lamontagne M, Adamczyk AP, Rakhra KS, Beaulé PE. 2015. Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 473:1289–1296.10.1007/s11999-014-3797-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KCG, Rouhi G, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE. 2012. Finite element analysis examining the effects of cam FAI on hip joint mechanical loading using subject-specific geometries during standing and maximum squat. HSS J. 8:206–212.10.1007/s11420-012-9292-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. 2002. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84:556–560.10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.12014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. 2008. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? Am J Roentgenol. 190:1260–1262.10.2214/AJR.07.3258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Murray DW, Carr AJ. 2010a. Genetic influences in the aetiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a sibling study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 92:209–216.10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22850
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Simpson DJ, Murray DW, Carr AJ. 2010b. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop. 81:134–141.10.3109/17453671003619011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preininger B, Schmorl K, von Roth P, Winkler T, Matziolis G, Perka C, Tohtz S. 2012. Femoral offset (3D) in patients without osteoarthritis – index values from 200 hip joints. Open Orthop J. 6:578–581.10.2174/1874325001206010578
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE. 2009. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:660–665.10.1007/s11999-008-0627-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranawat A, Schulz B, Baumbach S, Meftah M, Ganz R, Leunig M. 2011. Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement. HSS J. 7:115–119.10.1007/s11420-010-9192-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roels P, Agricola R, Oei E, Weinans H, Campoli G, Zadpoor AA. 2014. Mechanical factors explain development of cam-type deformity. Osteoarthr Cartil. 22:2074–2082.10.1016/j.joca.2014.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenrock KA, Wahab KH, Werlen S, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. 2004. Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 54–60.10.1097/00003086-200401000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speirs AD, Beaulé PE, Rakhra KS, Schweitzer ME, Frei H. 2013a. Bone density is higher in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement deformities compared to normal subchondral bone. Osteoarthr Cartil. 21:1068–1073.10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speirs AD, Beaulé PE, Rakhra KS, Schweitzer ME, Frei H. 2013b. Increased acetabular subchondral bone density is associated with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Osteoarthr Cartil. 21:551–558.10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CWA. 2012. How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? Radiology. 264:514–521.10.1148/radiol.12112479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. 2007. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis – what the radiologist should know. Am J Roentgenol. 188:1540–1552.10.2214/AJR.06.0921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar