Empirical quantitative characterization of holographic phase images of normal and abnormal cervical cells by fractal descriptors

References

• Ashman KM, et al. 1994. Detecting bimodality in astronomical datasets. Astron J. 108:2348–2361.10.1086/117248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzerdjeb N, et al. 2016. Digital holographic microscopy as screening tool for cervical cancer preliminary study. Cancer Cytopathol. 124(8):573–580.10.1002/cncy.v124.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born M, Wolf E, editors. 1999. Principles of Optics. Cambridge University Press. p. 467–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno OM, et al. 2008. Fractal dimension applied to plant identification. Inf Sci. 178:2722–2733.10.1016/j.ins.2008.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrière F, et al. 2006. Characterization of micro-lenses by digital holographic microscopy. Appl Opt. 45:829–835.10.1364/AO.45.000829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuche E, et al. 1999. Simultaneous amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase contrast microscopy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms. Appl Opt. 38:6994–7001.10.1364/AO.38.006994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva Oliveira, et al. 2014. Enhancing fractal descriptors on images by combining boundary and interior of Minkowski dilation. Phys A. 393:2623–2635.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer kJ. 1986. The geometry of fractal sets. NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jantzen J, et al 2005. Pap-smear benchmark data for pattern classification. In: Proceedings of Nature inspired Smart Information Systems (NiSIS).p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper B, et al. 2015. Multimodal label-free growth and morphology characterization of different cell types in a single culture with quantitative digital holographic phase microscopy. Proc SPIE 9336, 933617.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp TR. 2007. Bimodality revisited. J Mod App St. 6:8–20.
   Google Scholar
• KOALAR. http://www.lynceetec.com/?s=koala
   Google Scholar
• Langehanenberg P, et al. 2011. Autofocusing in digital holographic microscopy 3D Res. 01:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot B. 1967. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension Science. 156:636–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquet P, et al. 2005. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt Lett. 30:468–470.10.1364/OL.30.000468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailescu M, et al. 2011a. Single particle atmospheric aerosol analysis using digital holographic microscopy. Proceedings of SPIE, 8074, 807403.10.1117/12.886755
   Google Scholar
• Mihailescu M, et al. 2011b. Automated imaging identification and counting of similar cells from digital hologram reconstruction. Appl Opt. 50:3589–3597.10.1364/AO.50.003589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailescu M, et al. 2013. 3D imaging and statistics of red blood cells in multiple deformation states. Proc Rom Acad Ser A. 14:211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailescu M, et al. 2016. Digital off-axis holographic microscopy: from cells visualization, to phase shift values, ending with physiological parameters evolution. Rom J Phys. 61:1009–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister R, et al. 2013. Good things peak in pairs: a note on the bimodality coefficient. Front Psychol. 4:700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plissiti ME, et al. 2011. Automated detection of cell nuclei in pap smear images using morphological reconstruction and clustering. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 15:233–241.10.1109/TITB.2010.2087030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonbrun E, Di Caprio G. 2015. Differentiating neutrophils using the optical coulter counter. Proceedings of SPIE 9336, Quantitative Phase Imaging, 933614.
   Google Scholar
• Shaked NT, Girshovitz P. 2012. Portable low-coherence interferometer for quantitative phase microscopy of live cells. Biomed Opt Express. 3:1757–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1981. Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality. J R Stat Soc B. 43:97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon D, et al. 2002. The 2001 Bethesda system. Termino-logy for reporting results of cervical cytology. J Am Med Assoc. 287:2114–2119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehman SV. 1997. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens Environ. 62:77–89.10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin J, et al. 2015. Latent modeling of flow cytometry cell populations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.04058.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, et al. 2008. Simple and robust digital holography for high-resolution imaging. Chin Opt Lett. 6:165.10.3788/COL
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi F, et al. 2013. Automated segmentation of multiple red blood cells with digital holographic microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 18:026006–026006.10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.026006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar