Augmented visualisation in the treatment of the liver tumours with radiofrequency ablation

References

• Abe Y, Sato S, Kato K, Hyakumachi T, Yanagibashi Y, Ito M, Abumi K. 2013. A novel 3D guidance system using augmented reality for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 19:492–501.10.3171/2013.7.SPINE12917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DK, Fryberger CT, Ponce BA. 2015. The emergence of augmented reality in orthopaedic surgery and education. Orthopaedic J Harvard Med School. 16: 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Birkfellner W, Huber K, Watzinger F, Figl M, Wanschitz F, Hanel R, Rafolt D, Ewers R, Bergmann H. 2000. Development of the varioscope AR – a see-through HMD for computer-aided surgery. Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR), Munich; p. 54–59.10.1109/ISAR.2000.880923
   Google Scholar
• Cleary K, Cheng P, Enquobahrie A, Yaniv Z. 2009. IGSTK: the book. Gaithersburg, MD: Signature Book Printing.
   Google Scholar
• 3D Slicer. 2016 [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.slicer.org
   Google Scholar
• De Mauro A, Mazars J, Manco L, Mataj T, Hernández A, De Paolis LT. 2012. Intraoperative navigation system for spine surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 7:486–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paolis LT, Aloisio G. 2012. Augmented reality in minimally invasive surgery. 5th International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interactions (ACHI 2012). Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• De Paolis LT, Ricciardi F, Giuliani F. 2014. Development of a serious game for laparoscopic suture training. First International Conference Augmented and Virtual Reality (AVR 2014). LNCS, Lecce; Vol. 8853; p. 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein AJ, Groeneveld PW, Harhay MO, Yang F, Polsky D. 2013. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on medical spending and employee absenteeism. JAMA Surg. 148:641–647.10.1001/jamasurg.2013.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn BK. 1987. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am. 4:629.10.1364/JOSAA.4.000629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. 2006. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Edu Counsel. 61:173–190.10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITK-Snap. 2014. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.itksnap.org
   Google Scholar
• König TS. 2001. Usability issues in 3D medical visualization [PhD thesis]. Wien: Technische Universitat Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Livatino S, De Paolis L, D’Agostino M, Zocco A, Agrimi A, De Santis A, Bruno LV, Lapresa M. 2015. Stereoscopic visualization and 3D technologies in medical endoscopic teleoperation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 62:525–535.10.1109/TIE.2014.2334675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liver Explorer App. 2013. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.mevis.fraunhofer.de
   Google Scholar
• Maier-Hein L, Tekbas A, Seitel A, Pianka A, Müller SA, Satzl S, Schawo S, Radeleff B, Tetzlaff R, Franz AM, et al. 2008. In vivo accuracy assessment of a needlebased navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver. Med Phys. 35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimics Medical Imaging Software, 2015. Materialise Group [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.materialise.com/en/products-and-services#medical
   Google Scholar
• Nagorney DM, van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM, Adson MA. 1989. Primary hepatic malignancy: surgical management and determinants of survival. Surgery. 1989:740–748.
   Google Scholar
• Navab N, Bani-Kashemi A, Mitschke M. 1999. Merging visible and invisible: two camera-augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC) applications. Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR), San Francisco, CA; p. 134–141.10.1109/IWAR.1999.803814
   Google Scholar
• NDI Polaris Vicra [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.ndigital.com/medical/products/#optical-measurement-systems
   Google Scholar
• Nicolau S, Pennec X, Soler L, Ayache N. 2005. A complete augmented reality guidance system for liver punctures: first clinical evaluation. Eighth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’05). LNCS, Palm Spring, CA; Vol. 3749; p. 539–547.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolau S, Garcia A, Pennec X, Soler L, Buy X, Gangi A, Ayache N, Marescaux J. 2009. An augmented reality system for liver thermal ablation: design and evaluation on clinical cases. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Olbrich B, Traub J, Wiesner S, Wiechert A, Feußner H, Navab N. 2005. Respiratory motion analysis: towards gated augmentation of the liver. Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery; Berlin; 248–253.
   Google Scholar
• OsiriX. 2004. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from:
   Google Scholar
• ParaView. 2015. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.paraview.org
   Google Scholar
• Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R. 2004. 3D Slicer. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro; Arlington, VA; p. 632–635.
   Google Scholar
• Reitinger B, Bornik A, Beichel R, Werkgartner G, Sorantin E. 2004. Tools for augmented reality based liver resection planning. Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, San Diego (CA); p. 88–99.10.1117/12.535545
   Google Scholar
• Ricciardi F, Copelli C, De Paolis LT. 2015. A pre-operative planning module for an augmented reality application in maxillo-facial surgery. 2nd International Conference Augmented and Virtual Reality (AVR 2015). Vol. 9254. Springer LNCS, Lecce; p. 244–254.
   Google Scholar
• Richards MK, McAteer JP, Drake FT, Goldin AB, Khandelwal S, Gow KW. 2015. A national review of the frequency of minimally invasive surgery among general surgery residents: assessment of ACGME case logs during 2 decades of general surgery resident training. JAMA Surg. 150:169–172.10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger C, David L, Argenta L. 2014. Latest trends in minimally invasive synostosis surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 22:316–321.10.1097/MOO.0000000000000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splechtna R, Fuhrmann A, Wegenkittl R. 2002. ARAS – Augmented reality aided surgery system description. VRVis Research Center for Virtual Reality and Visualization. Technical report. Wien, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Stüdeli T, Kalkofen D, Risholm P, Ali W, Freudenthal A, Samset E. 2008. Visualization tool for improved accuracy in needle placement during percutaneous radio-frequency ablation of liver tumors. Medical Imaging 2008: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling. Vol. 6918.
   Google Scholar
• Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Gustapane S, De Nunzio G, Bochicchio M, De Paolis L, Aloisio G. 2012. Robotic assisted surgery in endoscopy: the problem of learning curve. Laparoscopy: New Developments, Procedures and Risks. Nova Science, New York, NY; Chapter 2. p. 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer BC. 2010. Best practices for minimally invasive procedures. AORN J. 91:558–575.10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VICON. 2009. [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://www.vicon.com
   Google Scholar
• Weiss L, Grundmann E, Torhorst J, Hartveit F, Moberg I, Eder M. 1986. Haematogenous metastastic patterns in colonic carcinoma: an analysis of 1541 necropsies. J Pathol. 150:195–203.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo TS. 2004. Insight into images. Natick, MA: A K Peters.10.1201/b10657
   Google Scholar