Shape parametrization of bio-mechanical finite element models based on medical images

References

• Alliez P, Cohen-Steiner D, Yvinec M, Desbrun M. 2005. Variational tetrahedral meshing. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). Vol. 24. New York (NY): ACM; p. 617–625.
   Google Scholar
• Alpert N, Bradshaw J, Kennedy D, Correia J. 1990. The principal axes transformation -- a method for image registration. J Nucl Med. 31(10):1717–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker TJ. 2002. Mesh movement and metamorphosis. Eng Comput. 18(3):188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Berthet F. 2017. An investigation of human body model morphing for the assessment of abdomen responses to impact against a population of test subjects. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(1):142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 24(4):509–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. 1992. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14(2):239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltcheva D, Bechmann D, Thery S. 2007. Discrete delaunay: boundary extraction from voxel objects. In: Sixth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2007.3DIM’07. Montreal, Quebec: IEEE; p. 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1989. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 11(6):567–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzacchiello D, Aguado JV, Chinesta F. 2017. Non-intrusive sparse subspace learning for parametrized problems. Arch Comput Methods Eng:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botev Z. 2017. The normal law under linear restrictions: simulation and estimation via minimax tilting. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 79(1):125–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucki M, Lobos C, Payan Y. 2010. A fast and robust patient specific finite element mesh registration technique: application to 60 clinical cases. Med Image Anal. 14(3):303–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucki M, Lobos C, Payan Y, Hitschfeld N. 2011. Jacobian-based repair method for finite element meshes after registration. Eng Comput. 27(3):285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellano-Smith AD, Hartkens T, Schnabel J, Hose DR, Liu H, Hall WA, Truwit CL, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL. 2001. Constructing patient specific models for correcting intraoperative brain deformation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Utrecht, Netherlands: Springer; p. 1091–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Medioni G. 1992. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput. 10(3):145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi Y, Liu J, Venkatesh SK, Huang S, Zhou J, Tian Q, Nowinski WL. 2011. Segmentation of liver vasculature from contrast enhanced CT images using context-based voting. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 58(8):2144–2153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couteau B, Payan Y, Lavallée S. 2000. The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3d mesh generator for finite element structures. J Biomech. 33(8):1005–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal P, Munsell BC, Wang S, Tang J, Oliver K, Ninomiya H, Zhou X, Fujita H. 2007. A fast 3d correspondence method for statistical shape modeling. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR’07. Minneapolis: IEEE; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Davies RH. 2002. Learning shape: optimal models for analysing natural variability [dissertation].
   Google Scholar
• Dokládal P, Lohou C, Perroton L, Bertrand G. 1999. Liver blood vessels extraction by a 3-d topological approach. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI’99. Cambridge: Springer; p. 98–105.
   Google Scholar
• Frericks BB, Caldarone FC, Nashan B, Savellano DH, Stamm G, Kirchhoff TD, Shin HO, Schenk A, Selle D, Spindler W, et al. 2004. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol. 14(2):326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuzaine C, Remacle JF. 2009. Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 79(11):1309–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosland NM, Bafna R, Magnotta VA. 2009. Automated hexahedral meshing of anatomic structures using deformable registration. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12(1):35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazrati-Marangalou J. 2013. Database of femur samples. Available from: https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:4ae59365-92f0-480b-a899-ade34bc84a00.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann T, Meinzer HP. 2009. Statistical shape models for 3d medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal. 13(4):543–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J. 2018. Parametric human modeling. In: Yang K, editor. Basic finite element method as applied to injury biomechanics. Detroit (MI): Elsevier; p. 417–445.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe IT. 2002. Principal component analysis. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kjer HM, Wilm J. 2010. Evaluation of surface registration algorithms for pet motion correction [dissertation]. Technical University of Denmark, DTU, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Lu YC, Kemper AR, Gayzik S, Untaroiu CD, Beillas P. 2013. Statistical modeling of human liver incorporating the variations in shape, size, and material properties. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:285–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu YC, Untaroiu CD. 2013. Statistical shape analysis of clavicular cortical bone with applications to the development of mean and boundary shape models. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 111(3):613–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YC, Untaroiu CD. 2014. A statistical geometrical description of the human liver for probabilistic occupant models. J Biomech. 47(15):3681–3688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandain G, Bertrand G, Ayache N. 1993. Topological segmentation of discrete surfaces. Int J Comput Vis. 10(2):183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer CR, Fitzpatrick JM. 1993. A review of medical image registration. In: Maciunas RJ, editor. Interactive image-guided neurosurgery. Park ridge (IL): American Association of Neurological Surgeons; p. 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Shontz SM, Vavasis SA. 2003. A mesh warping algorithm based on weighted laplacian smoothing. In: Proceedings of 12th International Meshing Roundtable. Santa Fe, NM; p. 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Shontz SM, Vavasis SA. 2010. Analysis of and workarounds for element reversal for a finite element-based algorithm for warping triangular and tetrahedral meshes. BIT Numer Math. 50(4):863–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shontz SM, Vavasis SA. 2012. A robust solution procedure for hyperelastic solids with large boundary deformation. Eng Comput. 28(2):135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Hardisty MR, Whyne CM. 2008. Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. J Biomech. 41(7):1381–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Giessen M, Foumani M, Streekstra GJ, Strackee SD, Maas M, van Vliet LJ, Grimbergen KA, Vos FM. 2010. Statistical descriptions of scaphoid and lunate bone shapes. J Biomech. 43(8):1463–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Giessen M, Smitsman N, Strackee SD, Van Vliet LJ, Grimbergen KA, Streekstra GJ, Vos FM. 2009. A statistical description of the articulating ulna surface for prosthesis design. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI’09. Boston (MA): IEEE; p. 678–681.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cao L, Bai Z, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hoff CN, Hu J. 2016. A parametric ribcage geometry model accounting for variations among the adult population. J Biomechan. 49(13):2791–2798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver AA, Schoell SL, Stitzel JD. 2014. Morphometric analysis of variation in the ribs with age and sex. J Anat. 225(2):246–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R, Zhou X, Hirano Y, Tachibana R, Hara T, Kido S, Fujita H. 2013. Particle system based adaptive sampling on spherical parameter space to improve the mdl method for construction of statistical shape models. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Cao L, Fanta A, Reed MP, Neal M, Wang JT, Lin CH, Hu J. 2017. An automated method to morph finite element whole-body human models with a wide range of stature and body shape for both men and women. J Biomech. 60:253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar