In vivo person specific human body simulation for development and optimisation of surgical methods and materials

References

• Ambrósio JAC, Pereira S, Manuel FO, Pina da Silva F, editors. 1996. 17-19 Jul. Crashworthiness of transportation systems: structural impact and occupant protection. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Tróia, Portugal. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Canha J, Dimasi F, Tang Y, Haffner M, Shams T. 2000. Development of a finite element model of the thor crash test dummy. SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium: Centre Européen d’Etudes de Sécurité et d’Analyse des Risques, France. Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut Cambresis, France. University of West Bohemia, Czech. Warsaw University of Technology, Poland. EU Thomo Project, www.thomo.eu, Jan 2009-June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson NJ, Offiah AC, Reilly GC, Carre MJ. 2013. Patient-specific finite element modelling and validation of porcine femora in torsion. STRAIN. 49(3):p212–p220. JUN.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist MD, editor. 2005. IUTAM symposium on impact biomechanics: from fundamental insights to applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gray H. 1973. Anatomy of the human body, twenty-ninth American edition.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen KS, Mononen ME, Jurvelin JS, Töyräs J, Korhonen RK. 2013. Importance of depth-wise distribution of collagen and proteoglycans in articular cartilage–a 3D finite element study of stresses and strains in human knee joint. J Biomech. 46(6):1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirz M, Dietrich W, Gfrerrer A, Lang J. 2013. Integrated computer-aided design in automotive development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue A, Chosa E, Goto K, Tajima N. 2013 May. Nonlinear stress analysis of the supraspinatus tendon using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 21(5):1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Kisanuki Y, Watanabe I, Furusu K, Miki K. 2002. Development of a Finite Element Model of the Total Human Model Forsafety (Thums) And Application to Injury Reconstruction, www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc0111/2002/Session1/1.2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H. 2015. Development and Validation of the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) toward further understanding of occupant injury mechanisms in precrash and during crash. J Traffic Inj Prev. 16(sup1): ESV Peer-Reviewed Journal for the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luboz V, Chabanas M, Swider P, Payan Y. 2005. Orbital and maxillofacial computer aided surgery: patient-specific finite element models to predict surgical outcomes. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 8(4):259–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishida N, Kato Y, Imajo Y, Kawano S, Taguchi T. 2011. Biomechanical study of the spinal cord in thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Cord Med. 34(5):518–522. Sep.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige Little J, Adam C, 2011. Patient-specific computational biomechanics for simulating adolescent scoliosis surgery: predicted vs clinical correction for a preliminary series of six patients. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 27(3): Mar 01. 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho A, Fonseca JC, Rodrigues NF, Henriques-Coelho T, Correia-Pinto J, Vilaça JL. Jan 16 2014. Finite element analysis of pectus carinatum surgical correction via a minimally invasive approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jan 16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potočnik B, Zazula D, Cigale B, Heric D, Cibula E, TomažIč T. 2008. A patient-specific knee joint computer model using MRI data and and ‘in vivo’ compressive load from the optical force measuring system. J Comput Inf Technol. 16(3):209–222. Sep.
   Google Scholar
• Randecker H. December 2005. Median sternotomy closure: a simple inexpensive effective technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 80(6).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo Z, Beek M, Whyne CM. 2013. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modeling of the human pelvis. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 29. 104–113. Published online 2012 Jul 10 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider LW, Robbins DH, Pflug MA, Snyder RG. 1983. Anthropometry of motor vehicle occupants. Vol. 2. UMTRI-83-53-2, NHTSA
   Google Scholar
• Scholz R, Hoffmann F, von Sachsen S, Drossel W-G, Klöhn C, Voigt C. 2013.Validation of density-elasticity relationships for finite element modeling of human pelvic bone by modal analysis. J Biomech. 46(15):2667–2673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot J, Koivumäki J, Kuhn V, Eckstein F, Jämsä T. 2014. A novel methodology for generating 3D finite element models of the hip from 2D radiographs. J Biomech. 47(2):438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AB, Gayzik FS, Moreno DP, Rhyne AC, Vavalle NA, Stitzel JD. 2012 22–24 Mar. A paradigm for human body finite element model integration from a set of regional models. Symposium & International ISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation Symposium Hosted by Virginia Tech - Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Sun W. 2013. Finite element modeling of mitral valve dynamic deformation using patient-specific multi-slices computed tomography scans. Ann Biomed Eng. 41(1):p142–p153. JAN.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wriggers P. 2009. Nonlinear finite element methods. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yongpravat C, Kim HM, Gardner TR, Bigliani LU, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. 2013. Glenoid implant orientation and cement failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: A finite element analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22(7):940–947. July.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Fox DA. 2013. The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. 7th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar