Volumetric monitoring of cutaneous leishmaniasis ulcers: can camera be as accurate as laser scanner?

References

• Callieri M, Cignoni P, Pingi P, Scopigno R, Coluccia M, Gaggio G, Romanelli MN. 2003. Derma: monitoring the evolution of skin lesions with a 3d system. In: VMV. Munich, Germany: Aka GmbH. p. 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. 1997. Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vision. 22(1):61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cignoni P, Callieri M, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ranzuglia G 2008. Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference; Salerno, Italy: Eurographics. Vol. 2008. p. 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Foltynski P, Ladyzynski P, Wojcicki JM. 2014. A new smartphone-based method for wound area measurement. Artif Organs. 38(4):346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A. 2017. Real time wound segmentation/management using image processing on handheld devices. J Comput Methods Sci Eng. 17(2):321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettiarachchi N, Mahindaratne R, Mendis G, Nanayakkara H, Nanayakkara ND. 2013. Mobile based wound measurement. In: Point-of-Care Healthcare Technologies (PHT), 2013 IEEE. Bangalore, India: IEEE. p. 298–301.
   Google Scholar
• Jones BF, Plassmann P. 1995. An instrument to measure the dimensions of skin wounds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 42(5):464–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen LB, Sørensen JA, Jemec GB, Yderstræde KB. 2016. Methods to assess area and volume of wounds–a systematic review. Int Wound J. 13(4):540–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazhdan M, Hoppe H. 2013. Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Trans Graph. 32(3):29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krouskop TA, Baker R, Wilson MS. 2002. A noncontact wound measurement system. J Rehabil Res Dev. 39(3):337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little C, McDonald J, Jenkins M, McCarron P. 2009. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume. J Wound Care. 18(6):250–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X, Wang C, Li F, Zhao X, Zhu E, Peng Y. 2017. A framework of wound segmentation based on deep convolutional networks. In: Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), 2017 10th International Congress on. IEEE. Shanghai, China: IEEE. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Malian A, Azizi A, Van Den Heuvel F. 2004. Medphos: a new photogrammetric system for medical measurement. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 35(B5):311–316.
   Google Scholar
• Malian A, van Den Heuvel F, Azizi A. 2002. A robust photogrammetric system for wound measurement. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 34(5):264–269.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon M, Rivett T, Robinson B. 2012. Study: assessment of accuracy and repeatability on wound models of a new hand-held, electronic wound measurement device. In: Symposium for Advanced Wound Care SAWC. Atlanta: SAWC Network.
   Google Scholar
• Ondrúška P, Kohli P, Izadi S. 2015. Mobilefusion: real-time volumetric surface reconstruction and dense tracking on mobile phones. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 21(11):1251–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk C, Dubin S, Schafer M, Shi WY, Chou MC. 1996. A new structured light method for 3-d wound measurement. In: Bioengineering Conference, 1996., Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Twenty-Second Annual Northeast. New Jersey, NJ: IEEE. p. 70–71.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovčič U, Diaci J, Možina J, Jezeršek M. 2015. Wound perimeter, area, and volume measurement based on laser 3d and color acquisition. Biomed Eng Online. 14(1):39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plassmann P, Jones C, McCarthy M. 2007. Accuracy and precision of the hand-held mavis wound measurement device. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 6(3):176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Plassmann P, Jones T. 1998. Mavis: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Med Eng Phys. 20(5):332–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerleau F, Colas F, Siegwart R, Magnenat S. 2013. Comparing icp variants on real-world data sets. Auton Robots. 34(3):133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putzer D, Haselbacher M, Klug S, Nogler M. 2014. Assessment of the size of the surgical site in minimally invasive hip surgery. Adv Wound Care. 3(6):438–444.
   Google Scholar
• Sirazitdinova E, Deserno TM. 2017. System design for 3d wound imaging using low-cost mobile devices. In: Medical Imaging 2017: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics. Orlando, FL: SPIE. Vol. 10138. p. 1013810.
   Google Scholar
• Su P, Drysdale RLS. 1997. A comparison of sequential delaunay triangulation algorithms. Computat Geom. 7(5–6):361–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treuillet S, Albouy B, Lucas Y. 2009. Three-dimensional assessment of skin wounds using a standard digital camera. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 28(5):752–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stralen KJ, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. 2008. Agreement between methods. Kidney Int. 74(9):1116–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Pedersen PC, Strong DM, Tulu B, Agu E, Ignotz R. 2015. Smartphone-based wound assessment system for patients with diabetes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(2):477–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannous H, Lucas Y, Treuillet S. 2011. Enhanced assessment of the wound-healing process by accurate multiview tissue classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 30(2):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C. 2013. Towards linear-time incremental structure from motion. In: 3DTV-Conference, 2013 International Conference on. IEEE. Washington, DC: IEEE. p. 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Zenteno O, González E, Treuillet S, Castañeda B, Valencia B, Llanos A, Lucas Y. 2017. Volume estimation of skin ulcers: can cameras be as accurate as laser scanners? In: European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Porto, Portugal: Springer. p. 735–744.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Zenteno O, Treuillet S, Castaneda B. 2017. Multimodal viewing interface for skin ulcers (leish-muvi). In: European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Porto, Portugal: Springer. p. 777–784.
   Google Scholar
• Zvietcovich F, Castañeda B, Valencia B, Llanos-Cuentas A. 2012. A 3d assessment tool for accurate volume measurement for monitoring the evolution of cutaneous leishmaniasis wounds. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. California: IEEE. p. 2025–2028.
   Google Scholar