Integrated 3D anatomical model for automatic myocardial segmentation in cardiac CT imagery

References

• Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. 1997. Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis. 22(61):61–79.
   Google Scholar
• CDC. 2015. Heart disease: scope and impact. . [accessed 2017 Dec 11] http://www.theheartfoundation.org/heart-disease-facts/heart-disease-statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty A, Staib L, Duncan J. 1994. An integrated approach to boundary finding in medical images. Proc. IEEE Workshop Biomedical Image Analysis. Seattle, WA: IEEE. p. 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chan T, Vese L. 1999. An active contour model without edges. Int. Conf. Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision. Corfu, Greece: Springer-Verlag  Berlin Heidelberg. p. 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Chan T, Vese L. 2001. A level set algorithm for minimizing the mumford-shah functional in image processing. IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision. Vancouver, BC: IEEE,  p. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Thiruvenkadam S, Huang F, Wilson D, Geiser EA, Tagare H. 2001. On the incorporation of shape priors into geometric active contours. IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision. Vancouver, BC: IEEE, p. 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Gupta K. 1989. A historical note on finite rotations. J Appl Mech. 56(1):139–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cootes T, Edwards G, Taylor C. 2001. Active appearance models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 23(6):681–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cootes T, Taylor C. 1992. Smart snakes. Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference. Leeds, UK: Springer, p. 266–275.
   Google Scholar
• Cootes T, Taylor C. 1998. Active appearance models. Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. Vol. 2; Freiburg, Germany: Springer-Verlag  Berlin Heidelberg. p. 484–498.
   Google Scholar
• Cootes T, Taylor C, Cooper C, Graham J. 1995. Active shape models - their training and application. Comput Vision Image Understanding. 61(9):38–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cootes TF, Taylor CJ 2001. Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. University of Manchester. Report No.: MSU-CSE-06-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dryden I, Mardia K. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ecabert O, Peters J, Schramm H, Lorenz C, von Berg J, Walker M. 2008. Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in ct images. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 27(9):1189–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Yezzi A. 2015. A compact formula for the derivative of a 3-d rotation in exponential coordinates. J Math Imaging Vis. 51(3):378–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Kikinis R, Bouix S, Shenton M, Tannenbaum A. 2012. A 3d interactive multi-object segmentation tool using local robust statistics driven active contours. Med Image Anal. 16(6):1216–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc Series B. 53(2):285–339.
   Google Scholar
• Kichenessamy S, Kumar A, Olver P, Tannenbaum A, Yezzi A. 1995. Gradient flows and geometric active contour models. Proc. of Intl. Conf. Computer Vision. Cambridge, MA: IEEE, p. 810–815.
   Google Scholar
• Kirişli HA, Schaap M, Klein S, Papadopoulou SL, Bonardi M, Chen CH, Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Vonken EJ, van der Geest RJ, et al. 2010. Evaluation of a multi-atlas based method for segmentation of cardiac cta data: a large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study. Med Phys. 37(12):6279–6291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventon M, Grimson E, Faugeras O. 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Hilton Head Island, SC: IEEE, Vol. 1. p. 316–323.
   Google Scholar
• Leveton M 2000. Statistical models in medical image analysis [ dissertation]. Boston (MA): Massachussets Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellen TK, Eubank W. 2003. Pet-ct image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 22:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell SC, Lelieveldt B, van der Geest RJ, Bosch JG, Reiber JHC, Sonka M. 2001. Multistage hybrid active appearance model matching: segmentation of left and right ventricles in cardiac mr images. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 20(5):415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford D, Shah J. 1989. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun Pure Appl Math. 42(6):577–685.
   Google Scholar
• Murray R, Li Z, Sastry S. 1994. A mathematical introduction to robotic manipulation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osher S, Sethian J. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on hamilton-jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys. 79(1):12–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinelli M, Faber T, Arepalli C, Appia V, Vinten-Johnsen J. 2014. Automatic detection of left and right ventricles from cta enables efficient alignment of anatomy with myocardial perfusion data. J Nucl Cardiol. 21:96–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian N. 1999. On the momentum term in gradient descent learning algorithms. Neural Networks. 12(1):145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfing T, Brandt R, Menzel R, Maurer CR. 2003. Segmentation of three-dimensional images using non-rigid registration: methods and validation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. Proc SPIE. 5032:363–374.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian R. 2017. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv. 1609.04747v2 [cs.LG]:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sethian J. 1996. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93(4):1591–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad R, Bos D, Budde RPJ, Pellikaan K, Niessen WJ, van der Lugt A, Walsum T. 2017. Automatic segmentation and quantification of the cardiac structures from non-contrast-enhanced cardiac ct scans. Phys Med Biol. 62(9):3798. [accessed 2018 Mar 25] http://stacks.iop.org/0031-9155/62/i=9/a=3798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staib L, Duncan J. 1992. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable contour models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14:1061–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical binary classification method. 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F1_score.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai A, Yezzi A, Wells W, Tempany C, Tucker D, Fan A, Grimson WE, Willsky A. 2003. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 22:137–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Assen HC, Danilouchkine MG, Dirksen MS, Reiber JH, Lelieveldt BP. 2008. A 3-d active shape model driven by fuzzy inference: application to cardiac ct and mr. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 12(5):595–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Assen HC, Danilouchkine MG, Frangi FF, Ordas S, Westenberg JJ, Reiber JH. 2006. Spasm: A 3d-asm for segmentation of sparse and arbitrarily oriented cardiac mri data. Med Image Anal. 10(2):286–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikram A, Ganapathy B, Abufadel A, Yezzi A, Faber T. 2010. A regions of confidence based approach to enhance segmentation with shape priors. Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging; San Jose, CA: SPIE; p. 753302.
   Google Scholar
• Vikram A, Ganapathy B, Yezzi A, Faber T. 2011. Localized principal component analysis based curve evolution: A divide and conquer approach. Proc. of IEEE International Conference in Computer Vision. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, p. 1981–1986.
   Google Scholar
• Weese J, Kaus MR, Lorenz C, Lobregt S, Truyen R, Pekar V. 2001. Shape constrained deformable models for 3-d medical image segmentation. Information Processing in Medical Imaging; Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. p. 380–387.
   Google Scholar
• Yezzi A, Kichenassamy S, Kumar A, Olver P, Tannenbaum A. 1997. A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 16:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yezzi A, Zollei L, Kapur T. 2003. A variational framework for integrating segmentation and registration through active contours. J Med Image Anal. 7:171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Barbu A, Georgescu B, Scheuering M, Comaniciu D. 2008. Four-chamber heart modeling and automatic segmentation for 3d cardiac ct volumes using marginal space learning and steerable features. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 27(11):1668–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Gao Y, Appia V, Yezzi A, Arepalli C, Faber T, Stillman A, Tannenbaum A. 2013a. Automatic delineation of the myocardial wall from ct images via shape segmentation and variational region growing. IEEE Trans Biomed Imaging. 60(10):2887–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Gao Y, Appia V, Yezzi A, Arepalli C, Faber T, Stillman A, Tannenbaum A. 2013b. Automatic delineation of the myocardial wall from ct images via shape segmentation and variational region growing. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering. p. 2887–2895. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6523066
   Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Gao Y, Appia V, Yezzi A, Arepalli C, Faber T, Stillman A, Tannenbaum A. 2014. A complete system for automatic extraction of left ventricular myocardium from ct images using shape segmentation and contour evolution. IEEE Trans Image Process. 23(3):1340–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar