Surface damage evaluation and computational modelling of clinically failed knee liners

References

• Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1331–1340.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services, & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2010 table, procedures by selected patient characteristics-number by procedure, category and age. CDC.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott ID, Amis AA. The consequences of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br Volume. 2006;88(12):1549–1556.
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, Jasty M, et al. Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(7):887–897.
   Google Scholar
• Townley CO. The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty G, Vashishtha M, Leeder D. Polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: A review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015;6(2):108–112.
   Google Scholar
• Baena JC, Wu J, Peng Z. Wear performance of UHMWPE and reinforced UHMWPE composites in arthroplasty applications: a review. Lubricants. 2015;3(2):413–436.
   Google Scholar
• Total knee replacement. (2019). Accessed 2019 Mar 25. Avaialble from: https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/patients-caregivers/knee/about-knee-replacement.html
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S. M. (2009). Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement and medical devices. UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York. p. 97–114
   Google Scholar
• Gundapaneni D, Laughlin RT, Goswami T. Characterization of Total Ankle Replacement Liners. Eng Fail Anal. 2016;70:237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Alhassan S, Goswami T. Wear rate model for UHMWPE in total joint applications. Wear. 2008;265(1):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt H, Goswami T. Implant wear mechanisms—basic approach. Biomed Mater. 2008;3(4):042001.
   Google Scholar
• Childs K, Crosby L, Goswami T. Quantitative analysis of retrieved glenoid liners. Lubricants. 2016;4(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• Salih A, Ktistakis IP, Manganas S, et al. Investigation of retrieved cardiac devices. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2019;23(4): 2019. BJSTR. MS.ID.003924.
   Google Scholar
• Salih A (2019). Characterization of in-vivo damage in implantable cardiac devices and the lead residual properties. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Hood RW, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1983;17(5):829–842.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt JM, Haydon CM, Harvey EP, et al. Semi quantitative assessment methods for backside polyethylene damage in modular total knee replacements. Tribol Int. 2012;49:96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Ruberti J, Melotti S, et al. Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene tibial inserts. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi A Jr, Ellison V, Berend KR. Polyethylene wear is influenced by manufacturing technique in modular TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2798–2805.20.
   Google Scholar
• Blunn G, Joshi A, Minns R, et al. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(3):281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Liza S, Haseeb ASMA, Abbas AA, et al. Failure analysis of retrieved UHMWPE tibial insert in total knee replacement. Eng Fail Anal. 2011;18(6):1415–1423.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett RSJ, Biggerstaff S, Currier BH, et al. Unilateral tibial polyethylene liner failure in bilateral total knee arthroplasty—bilateral retrieval analysis at 8 years. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(5):753–758.
   Google Scholar
• von Feigenblatt CDOF, Domínguez DC, Vallés JEG The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Right (FERPA).
   Google Scholar
• Allen TT Probability Theory and Monte Carlo. In: Introduction to discrete event simulation and agent-based modeling. Springer-Verlag London; 2011. p. 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fung M, Reinitz SD, Van Citters DW, Variation of mechanical properties with oxidation in highly crosslinked remelted UHMWPE, ORS 2015 Annual Meeting, vol. 40, Orthopaedic Research Society, MGM Grand Hotel, Las Vegas, NV, 2015 (March 28–31).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, F2102-13, standard guide for evaluating the extent of oxidation in polyethylene fabricated forms intended for surgical implants, ASTM international,West Conshohocken, PA, 2013 www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda D, Hidalgo A, Calleja FB. An ir study of the “amorphous” phase in melt crystallized polyethylene. Spectrochim Acta Part A. 1978;34(5):475–480.
   Google Scholar
• Costa L, Jacobson K, Bracco P, et al. Oxidation of orthopaedic UHMWPE. Biomaterials. 2002;23(7):1613–1624.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot BJ, Gundapaneni D, Goswami T. Finite element analysis of stress and wear characterization in total ankle replacements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;34:134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gundapaneni D, Tsatalis JT, Laughlin RT, et al. Wear characteristics of WSU total ankle replacement devices under shear and torsion loads. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;44:202–223.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin MA, Clary CW, Fitzpatrick CK, et al. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. J Biomech. 2012;45(3):474–483.
   Google Scholar
• Elias JJ, Wilson DR, Adamson R, et al. Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. J Biomech. 2004;37(3):295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick CK, Baldwin MA, Clary CW, et al. Evaluating knee replacement mechanics during ADL with PID-controlled dynamic finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014;17(4):360–369.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbrück A, Woiczinski M, Weber P, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: a numerical study with a dynamic force controlled knee model. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13(1):91.
   Google Scholar
• Morra EA, Greenwald AS. Polymer insert stress in total knee designs during high-flexion activities: a finite element study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 2):120–124.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Bender A, Graichen F, et al. Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86035.
   Google Scholar
• “OrthoLoad.” Standard loads knee joint « orthoload. orthoload, 2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2016. <http://orthoload.com/test-loads/standard-loads-knee-joint/> Access data Nov. 10, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis G. Properties of crosslinked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2001;22(4):371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Ho FY, Ma HM, Liau JJ, et al. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Medel FJ, Kurtz SM, Parvizi J, et al. In vivo oxidation contributes to delamination but not pitting in polyethylene components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(5):802–810.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford L, Baker DA, Graham J, et al. Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1271–1282.
   Google Scholar
• Crowninshield RD, Wimmer MA, Jacobs JJ, et al. Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(5):754–761.
   Google Scholar
• Varadharajan S, Laughlin R, Goswami T. Analysis of a clinically failed, mechanically intact, hemi-toe implant. J Biomed Eng Biosci. 2016;3:22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta SP, Perruccio AV, Palaganas M, et al. Do women have poorer outcomes following total knee replacement? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(9):1476–1482.
   Google Scholar