Augmented reality visualization for craniosynostosis surgery

References

• Berryman DR. 2012. Augmented reality: a review. Med Ref Serv Q. 31(2):212–218. doi:10.1080/02763869.2012.670604.
   Google Scholar
• Burge J, Saber NR, Looi T, French B, Usmani Z, Anooshiravani N, Kim P, Forrest C, Phillips J. 2011. Application of CAD/CAM prefabricated age-matched templates in cranio-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 22(5):1810–1813. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8045.
   Google Scholar
• Carusi C, Bernardi C. 2016. An easy, efficient, and safe method for intraoperative digital photography by smartphone. Aesthetic Surg J. 36(9):NP284–NP286. doi:10.1093/asj/sjw136.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Day TW, Tang W, John NW 2017. Recent developments and future challenges in medical mixed reality. Proc 2017 IEEE Int Symp Mix Augment Reality, ISMAR 123–135. Nantes (France).
   Google Scholar
• Eftekhar B. 2017. Smartphone as a remote touchpad to facilitate visualization of 3d cerebral angiograms during aneurysm surgery. J Neurol Surgery, Part A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 78(5):502–506. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1598049.
   Google Scholar
• García-Mato D, García-Sevilla M, Ochandiando S, Moreta-Martinez R, Darriba-Allés JV, García-Leal R, Salmerón JI, Pascau J. 2020. CARS 2020—Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Proceedings of the 34th International Congress and Exhibition; June 23–27, 2020; Munich, Germany. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2020. Special issue of the International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS). Munich (Germany): Springer; p. 87–88. doi:10.1007/s11548-020-02171-6
   Google Scholar
• García-Mato D, Ochandiano S, García-Sevilla M, Navarro-Cuéllar C, Darriba-Allés JV, García-Leal R, Calvo-Haro JA, Pérez-Mañanes R, Salmerón JI, Pascau J. 2019. Craniosynostosis surgery: workflow based on virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation and 3D printed patient-specific guides and templates. Sci Rep. 9(1):17691. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54148-4.
   Google Scholar
• Han W, Yang X, Wu S, Fan S, Chen X, Aung ZM, Liu T, Zhang Y, Gu S, Chai G. 2019. A new method for cranial vault reconstruction: augmented reality in synostotic plagiocephaly surgery. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 47(8):1280–1284. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Hochfeld M, Lamecker H, Thomale U-W, Schulz M, Zachow S, Haberl H. 2014. Frame-based cranial reconstruction. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 13(3):319–323. doi:10.3171/2013.11.PEDS1369.
   Google Scholar
• Khechoyan DY, Saber NR, Burge J, Fattah A, Drake J, Forrest CR, Phillips JH. 2014. Surgical outcomes in craniosynostosis reconstruction: the use of prefabricated templates in cranial vault remodelling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 67(1):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.09.009.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmi O, Lo SJ, Johnson D, Anslow P. 2009. Craniosynostosis: a radiological and surgical perspective. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI. 30(6):492–512. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2009.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kobets AJ, Ammar A, Nakhla J, Scoco A, Nasser R, Goodrich JT, Abbott R. 2018. Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note. Child’s Nerv Syst. 34(5):965–970. doi:10.1007/s00381-018-3746-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mardini S, Alsubaie S, Cayci C, Chim H, Wetjen N. 2014. Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 67(3):336–343. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza CS, Safdar N, Okada K, Myers E, Rogers GF, Linguraru MG. 2014. Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling. Med Image Anal. 18(4):635–646. doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.02.008.
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Kübler AC, Krug B, Seifert U, Zöller JE. 2006. Application of an augmented reality tool for maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgery - A feasibility study. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 34(8):478–483. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.862.
   Google Scholar
• Moreta-Martinez R, García-Mato D, García-Sevilla M, Pérez-Mañanes R, Calvo-Haro J, Pascau J. 2018. Augmented reality in computer-assisted interventions based on patient-specific 3D printed reference. Healthc Technol Lett. 5(5):162–166. doi:10.1049/htl.2018.5072.
   Google Scholar
• Persing JA. 2008. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: management considerations in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 121(Supplement):1–11. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000305929.40363.bf.
   Google Scholar
• Porras AR, Paniagua B, Ensel S, Keating R, Rogers GF, Enquobahrie A, Linguraru MG. 2018. Locally affine diffeomorphic surface registration and its application to surgical planning of fronto-orbital advancement. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 37(7):1690–1700. doi:10.1109/TMI.2018.2816402.
   Google Scholar
• Seruya M, Borsuk DE, Khalifian S, Carson BS, Dalesio NM, Dorafshar AH. 2013. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 24(4):1100–1105. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828b7021.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R. 2013. Craniosynostosis. Indian J Plast Surg. 46(1):18. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.113702.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbacher DM. 2015. Three-dimensional analysis and surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 73(12):S40–S56. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.038.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Chai G, Zhang Y, Ma X, Gan J. 2011. Registration strategy using occlusal splint based on augmented reality for mandibular angle oblique split osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 22(5):1806–1809. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8064.
   Google Scholar