Evaluating surface visualization methods in semi-transparent volume rendering in virtual reality

References

• Baer A, Gasteiger R, Cunningham D, Preim B. 2011. Perceptual evaluation of ghosted view techniques for the exploration of vascular structures and embedded flow. Comput Graph Forum. 30(3):811–820. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01930.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bavoil L, Myers K. 2008. Order independent transparency with dual depth peeling. NVIDIA OpenGL SDK. [accessed 2019 Nov 13]. http://developer.download.nvidia.com/SDK/10/opengl/src/dual depth peeling/doc/DualDepthPeeling.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brecheisen R, Bartroli AVI, Platel B, Ter Haar RB 2008. Flexible GPU-based multi- volume ray-casting. 13th International Fall Workshop Vision, Modeling, and Visualization 2008, VMV 2008; Konstanz, Germany. p. 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Buchacher A, Erdt M. 2017. Single-pass stereoscopic GPU ray casting using re-projection layers. EGSR ’17 Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering: Experimental Ideas & Implementations; Helsinki, Finland. p. 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Carnecky R, Fuchs R, Mehl S, Jang Y, Peikert R. 2013. Smart transparency for illustrative visualization of complex flow surfaces. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 19(5):838–851. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6244795/
   Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Li X, Yang X, Ai D, Huang Y, Song H, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Chen X, Yang J. 2018. Perception enhancement using importance-driven hybrid rendering for augmented reality based endoscopic surgical navigation. Biomed Opt Express. 9(11):5205. doi:10.1364/BOE.9.005205.
   Google Scholar
• Diffuse. 2019. Specto – medical Visualisation; [accessed 2019 Nov 13]. https://www.diffuse.ch/.
   Google Scholar
• Draelos M, Keller B, Viehland C, Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Kuo A, Izatt J. 2018. Real-time visualization and interaction with static and live optical coherence tomography volumes in immersive virtual reality. Biomed Opt Express. 9(6):2825.
   Google Scholar
• Englund R, Ropinski T. 2018. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the perception of semi- transparent structures in direct volume rendering. Comput Graph Forum. 37(6):174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt C 2001. Interactive order-independent transparency; [accessed 2019 Nov 13]. https://www.gamedevs.org/uploads/interactive-order-independent-transparency.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi B, Zoller EI, Gerig N, Zam A, Rauter G, Cattin PC 2019. Direct visual and haptic volume rendering of medical data sets for an immersive exploration in virtual reality. In: Shen D, Liu T, Peters TM, Staib LH, Essert C, Zhou S, Yap PT, Khan A, editor. Medical image computing and computer assisted intervention – MICCAI 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fillion-Robin JC, Vimort JB, Pinter C, Lasso A, Rankin A 2019. slicervirtualreality: a slicer extension that enables user to interact with a slicer scene using virtual reality; [accessed 2019 Nov 13]. https://github.com/kitwaremedical/slicervirtualreality.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwiger M, Ljung P, Salama CR, Ropinski T 2008. Advanced illumination techniques for GPU volume raycasting. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 Courses; Singapore, Singapore. p. 1–166. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1508044.1508045.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JM. 2014. Volume perception: disparity extraction and depth representation in complex three-dimensional environments. J Vis. 14(12):11. http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/12/11.
   Google Scholar
• Heo R, Kalra D, Giambrone A, Gomez MJ, Leipsic J, Wong SC, Salemi A, Minutello R, Bergman GW, Lin F, et al. 2014. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of aortic valvar complex measurements and transcatheter aortic valve replacement deployment angles by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63(12 Supplement):A1216.
   Google Scholar
• Hitschrich N, Narang A, Schummers G, Addetia K, Hitschrich D, Mor-Avi V, Mumm B, Lang RM 2019. Planning structural heart interventions: comparison of measurements made on volume rendered 3D virtual reality models versus conventional 3D software, P2-069. In: 2019 ASE 30th Annual Scientific Sessions, Portland, USA. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography; Elsevier. p. B110. B1–B137.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson D, Kronander J, Ropinski T, Ynnerman A. 2012. Historygrams: enabling interactive global illumination in direct volume rendering using photon mapping. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 18(12):2364–2371. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357144
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson D, Sundén E, Ynnerman A, Ropinski T. 2014. A survey of volumetric illumination techniques for interactive volume rendering. Comput Graph Forum. 33(1):27–51. doi:10.1111/cgf.12252.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch G, Sweetman S, Bartels C, Raval A, Gimelli G, Jacobson K, Lozonschi L, Kohmoto T, Osaki S, François C, et al. 2018. Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of aortic annulus measurements on screening CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): implications for appropriate device sizing. Eur J Radiol. 105::209–215. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz A, Hadwiger M, Fuhrmann A, Splechtna R, Bühler K. 2006. GPU-based high-quality volume rendering for virtual environments. International Workshop Augmented Environ Medi Imaging Comput Aided Surg. p. 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger J, Westermann R. 2004. Acceleration techniques for GPU-based volume rendering. Proc 14th IEEE Visual 2003 (VIS’03). 287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Lasso A, Nam HH, Dinh PV, Pinter C, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Jhaveri S, Vimort JB, Martin K, Asselin M, et al. 2018. Interaction with volume-rendered three-dimensional echocardiographic images in virtual reality. J Am Soc Echocardiography. 31(10):1158–1160. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.011.
   Google Scholar
• Li A, Zaidi Q. 2000. Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vision Res. 40(2):217–242. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00169-8.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus JG, Bruckner S. 2018. Interactive dynamic volume illumination with refraction and caustics. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 24(1):984–993. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744438.
   Google Scholar
• Marreiros FM, Smedby Ö 2013. Stereoscopic static depth perception of enclosed 3D objects. Proceedings - SAP 2013: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception; Dublin, Ireland. p. 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Gomez A, Eck U, Navab N 2019. Visualization techniques for precise alignment in VR: a comparative study. 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR); mar. IEEE 735–741; Osaka, Japan. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8798135/.
   Google Scholar
• McKee SP. 1983. The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity. Vision Res. 23(2):191–198. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90142-6.
   Google Scholar
• MHPH VB, IJsselsteijn WA, Juola JF. 2012. Effectiveness of stereoscopic displays in medicine: A review. 3D Res. 3(1):3. doi:10.1007/3DRes.01(2012)3.
   Google Scholar
• Pandrangi VC, Gaston B, Appelbaum NP, Albuquerque FC, Levy MM, Larson RA. 2019. The application of virtual reality in patient education. Ann Vasc Surg. 59:184–189. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.015.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer M, Kenngott H, Preukschas A, Huber M, Bettscheider L, Müller-Stich B, Speidel S. 2018. IMHOTEP: virtual reality framework for surgical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 13(5):741–748. doi:10.1007/s11548-018-1730-x.
   Google Scholar
• Reitinger B, Bornik A, Beichel R, Schmalstieg D. 2006. Liver surgery planning using virtual reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 26(6):36–47. doi:10.1109/MCG.2006.131.
   Google Scholar
• Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - a review. ACM Comput Surv. 46(2):1–40. doi:10.1145/2543581.2543590.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein JC, Dech F. 2005. Precisely exploring medical models and volumes in collaborative virtual reality. Presence. 14(1):47–59. doi:10.1162/1054746053890233.
   Google Scholar
• Sunden E, Ropinski T. 2015. Efficient volume illumination with multiple light sources through selective light updates. IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium 2015-July. p. 231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Tietjen C, Isenberg T, Preim B 2005. Combining silhouettes, surface, and volume rendering for surgery education and planning. EUROVIS 2005: Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization; Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tsirlin I, Allison RS, Wilcox LM. 2008. Stereoscopic transparency: constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces. J Vis. 8(5):1–10. doi:10.1167/8.5.5.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer G, Levi DM. 1987. Depth attraction and repulsion of disparate foveal stimuli. Vision Res. 27(8):1361–1368. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(87)90212-4.
   Google Scholar
• Yang JC, Hensley J, Grün H, Thibieroz N. 2010. Real-time concurrent linked list construction on the GPU. Comput Graph Forum. 29(4):1297–1304.
   Google Scholar