Visualization of patient’s knee movement and joint contact area during knee flexion for orthopaedic surgery planing validation

References

• Al-Shammari MA, Hussein EQ, Oleiwi AA. 2017. Material characterization and stress analysis of a through knee prosthesis sockets. Int J Mech Mechatr Eng IJMME-IJENS. 17:06.
   Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND 1992. Method for registration of 3-d shapes. In: Sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures. vol. 1611. International Society for Optics and Photonics. p. 586–606.
   Google Scholar
• Burton A, Williams S, Brockett CL, Fisher J. 2012. In vitro comparison of fixed-and mobile meniscal–bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties: effect of design, kinematics, and condylar liftoff. J Arthroplasty. 27(8):1452–1459. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.011.
   Google Scholar
• Chehab E, Andriacchi T, Favre J. 2017. Speed, age, sex, and body mass index provide a rigorous basis for comparing the kinematic and kinetic profiles of the lower extremity during walking. J Biomech. 58:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.014.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas R, Brånemark R, Frossard L. 2016. Gait analysis of transfemoral amputees: errors in inverse dynamics are substantial and depend on prosthetic design. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 25(6):679–685. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2601378.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Hedley AK, Howard M, Cordes KM, Katsuya T 2017 Feb 21. Dynamic knee balancer with force or pressure sensing. US Patent 9,572,588.
   Google Scholar
• Grood E, Suntay W. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 105:136–144. doi:10.1115/1.3138397.
   Google Scholar
• Guan S, Gray HA, Schache AG, Feller J, de Steiger R, Pandy MG. 2017. In vivo six-degree-of-freedom knee-joint kinematics in overground and treadmill walking following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 35(8):1634–1643. doi:10.1002/jor.23466.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJ, Robertson BW. 2017. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 32(12):3854–3860. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021.
   Google Scholar
• Hargett Z, Gutierrez M, Harman M 2019. Verification of manual digitization methods during experimental simulation of knee motion. In: ASME 2019 Verification and Validation Symposium. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Huang SC 2017. The simulation for study of von mises stress sensitiveness to the change of coronal conformity in knee prosthesis. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. vol. 108. EDP Sciences. p. 13005.
   Google Scholar
• Joshua Twiggs B, Willy Theodore B, Andrew Ruys JR. 2017. Patient specific simulated dynamics following tka correlate with patient reported outcomes. CAOS. 1: 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Kainz H, Modenese L, Lloyd D, Maine S, Walsh H, Carty C. 2016. Joint kinematic calculation based on clinical direct kinematic versus inverse kinematic gait models. J Biomech. 49(9):1658–1669.
   Google Scholar
• Papagiannis GI, Triantafyllou AI, Roumpelakis IM, Papagelopoulos PJ, Babis GC. 2018. Gait analysis methodology for the measurement of biomechanical parameters in total knee arthroplasties. a literature review. J Orthop. 15(1):181–185. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.048.
   Google Scholar
• Reinschmidt C, Van Den Bogert A, Lundberg A, Nigg B, Murphy N, Stacoff A, Stano A. 1997. Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. Skeletal Mark Gait Post. 6(2):98–109. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(97)01110-7.
   Google Scholar
• Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. 2018. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 26(6):1589–1601. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4670-z.
   Google Scholar
• Schon JM, Moatshe G, Brady AW, Serra Cruz R, Chahla J, Dornan GJ, Turnbull TL, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. 2016. Anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction of the knee leads to overconstraint at any fixation angle. Am J Sports Med. 44(10):2546–2556. doi:10.1177/0363546516652607.
   Google Scholar
• Sera T, Iwai Y, Yamazaki T, Tomita T, Yoshikawa H, Naito H, Matsumoto T, Tanaka M. 2017. Strain measurements of the tibial insert of a knee prosthesis using a knee motion simulator. J Orthop. 14(4):495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Sugano N. 2018. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery for hip and knee: current state of the art in clinical application and basic research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe F, Yoshimoto S, Noda Y, Araki T, Uemura T, Takeuchi Y, Imai M, Sekitani T 2017. Flexible sensor sheet for real-time pressure monitoring in artificial knee joint during total knee arthroplasty. In: 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Seogwipo: IEEE. p. 1591–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XH, Dong X, Zhu BZ, Jiang L, Jin ZM, Suguro T, Cheng CK. 2019. A preclinical method for evaluating the kinematics of knee prostheses. Med Eng Phys. 66:84–90. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Xie X, Rusly R, DesJardins JD, Voss F, Chillag K, LaBerge M. 2017. Effect of rotational prosthetic alignment variation on tibiofemoral contact pressure distribution and joint kinematics in total knee replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 231(11):1034–1047. doi:10.1177/0954411917727564.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo JH, Seon JK, Lee DH, Song EK. 2019. No difference in outcomes and gait analysis between mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods using robotic total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 27(4):1142–1147. doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5133-x.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JY, Wang J, Tian DM, Jiang DP, Li JJ, Hu YC. 2020. Spherical center and rotating platform hinged knee prosthesis: finite-element model establishment, verification and contact analysis. Knee. 27(3):731–739. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.04.022.
   Google Scholar