Virtual reality technologies for clinical education: evaluation metrics and comparative analysis

References

• Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T. 2016. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 29:85–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.034.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman DA, McMahan RP. 2007. Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer. 40(7):36–43. doi:10.1109/MC.2007.257.
   Google Scholar
• Cecil J, Kumar MBR, Gupta A, Pirela-Cruz M, Chan-Tin E, Yu J 2016. Development of a virtual reality based simulation environment for orthopedic surgical training. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences” On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”. Rhodes, Greece: Springer. p. 206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson NA. 2004. Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance. In: Stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems XI. Vol. 5291. International Society for Optics and Photonics; San Jose, CA: SPIE. p. 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Freina L, Ott M. 2015. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The international scientific conference eLearning and software for education. Vol. 1. “ Carol I” National Defence University; Bucharest, Romania, p. 133.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman H, Vu D. 1997. Virtual reality: teaching tool of the twenty-first century? Acad Medi. 72(12):1076–1081. doi:10.1097/00001888-199712000-00018.
   Google Scholar
• Huber T, Paschold M, Hansen C, Wunderling T, Lang H, Kneist W. 2017. New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff. Surg Endosc. 31(11):4472–4477. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5500-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kaluschke M, Weller R, Zachmann G, Pelliccia L, Lorenz M, Klimant P, Knopp S, Atze JP, Móckel F 2018. Hips-a virtual reality hip prosthesis implantation simulator. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). Reutlingen, Germany: IEEE. p. 591–592.
   Google Scholar
• Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K, Chan A, Patel K, Wong J. 2016. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery—the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med. 4:23. doi:10.21037/atm.2016.12.23.
   Google Scholar
• Kooi FL, Toet A. 2004. Visual comfort of binocular and 3d displays. Displays. 25(2–3):99–108. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2004.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kramida G. 2015. Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 22(7):1912–1931. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2473855.
   Google Scholar
• Lin JW, Duh HBL, Parker DE, Abi-Rached H, Furness TA 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings ieee virtual reality 2002. Orlando, FL: IEEE. p. 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Maples-Keller JL, Yasinski C, Manjin N, Rothbaum BO. 2017. Virtual reality-enhanced extinction of phobias and post-traumatic stress. Neurotherapeutics. 14(3):554–563. doi:10.1007/s13311-017-0534-y.
   Google Scholar
• Mazuryk T, Gervautz M. 1996. Virtual reality-history, applications, technology and future. Institute of Computer Graphics, Vienna University of Technology, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Mon-Williams M, Warm JP, Rushton S. 1993. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 13(4):387–391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00496.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mujber TS, Szecsi T, Hashmi MS. 2004. Virtual reality applications in manufacturing process simulation. J Mater Process Technol. 155:1834–1838. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.401.
   Google Scholar
• Pelargos PE, Nagasawa DT, Lagman C, Tenn S, Demos JV, Lee SJ, Bui TT, Barnette NE, Bhatt NS, Ung N, et al. 2017. Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 35:1–4. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• Qian L, Barthel A, Johnson A, Osgood G, Kazanzides P, Navab N, Fuerst B. 2017. Comparison of optical see-through head-mounted displays for surgical interventions with object-anchored 2d-display. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 12(6):901–910. doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1564-y.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks R, Perlman A, Barak R. 2013. Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr Manage Econ. 31(9):1005–1017. doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.828844.
   Google Scholar
• Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV. 2016. Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front Rob AI. 3:74.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland IE 1968. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I. San Francisco, CA: ACM. p. 757–764.
   Google Scholar
• vision council Steve Kodey T. 2015. Us optical overview and outlook december 2015. Available from [accessed 2019 Aug 20]: https://www.thevisioncouncil.org/sites/default/files/Q415-Topline-Overview-Presentation-Stats-with-Notes-FINAL.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AS, O’Connor J, Taylor L, Carruthers D. 2017. A 3d virtual reality ophthalmoscopy trainer. Clin Teach. 14(6):427–431. doi:10.1111/tct.12646.
   Google Scholar
• Ziefle M. 1998. Effects of display resolution on visual performance. Hum Factors. 40(4):554–568. doi:10.1518/001872098779649355.
   Google Scholar