Advanced search
Publication Cover
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization Volume 10, 2022 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
205
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Improvement of image enhancement for mammogram images using Fuzzy Anisotropic Diffusion Histogram Equalisation Contrast Adaptive Limited (FADHECAL)

Saifullah Harith Suradia School of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kuala Nerus, MalaysiaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-1743View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Kamarul Amin Abdullaha School of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kuala Nerus, Malaysia;b Medical Imaging Research Group (MIRG), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kuala Nerus, MalaysiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-9579View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Nor Ashidi Mat Isac School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Nibong Tebal, MalaysiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-4914View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 67-75 | Received 14 May 2021, Accepted 20 Aug 2021, Published online: 05 Sep 2021

References

  • Akila K, Jayashree LS, Vasuki A. 2015. Mammographic image enhancement using indirect contrast enhancement techniques - A comparative study. Procedia Comput Sci. 47(C):255–261. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.205.
  • Chopra S, Davies EL. 2020. Breast cancer. Med (United Kingdom). 48(2):113–118.
  • Clark AF 2012. The mini-MIAS database of mammograms. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html
  • ElOuassif B, Idri A, Hosni M, Abran A. 2021. Classification techniques in breast cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 9(1):50–77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21681163.2020.1811159.
  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Masters BR. 2009. Digital image processing, third edition. J Biomed Opt. 14(2):029901. doi:10.1117/1.3115362.
  • Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, MR& KWP. 2001. The digital database for screening mammography. Proc Fifth Int Work Digit Mammogr. 212–218. http://www.eng.usf.edu/cvprg/Mammography/Database.html.
  • Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. 2011. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 155(8):481. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.
  • Jenifer S, Parasuraman S, Kadirvelu A. 2016. Contrast enhancement and brightness preserving of digital mammograms using fuzzy clipped contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput J. 42:167–177. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.039.
  • João A, Gambaruto A, Sequeira A. 2020. Anisotropic gradient-based filtering for object segmentation in medical images. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 8(6):621–630. doi:10.1080/21681163.2020.1776642.
  • Lee S, Jin Park S, Jeon JM, Lee MH, Ryu DY, Lee E, Kang SH, Lee Y. 2019. Noise removal in medical mammography images using fast non-local means denoising algorithm for early breast cancer detection: a phantom study. Optik (Stuttg). 180:569–575. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.167.
  • Magudeeswaran V, Ravichandran CG. 2013. Fuzzy logic-based histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. Math Probl Eng. 2013:1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/891864.
  • Nimkar, S., Shrivastava, S., & Varghese, S. (2013). Contrast Enhancement and Brightness Preservation Using Multi-Decomposition Histogram Equalization. Signal & Image Processing : An International Journal, 4(3), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.5121/sipij.2013.4308
  • Nounou MI, Elamrawy F, Ahmed N, Abdelraouf K, Goda S, Syed-Sha-Qhattal H. 2015. Breast cancer: conventional diagnosis and treatment modalities and recent patents and technologies supplementary issue: targeted therapies in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res. 9(Suppl2):17–34. /pmc/articles/PMC4589089/?report=abstract.
  • Panetta K, Zhou Y, Agaian S, Jia H. 2011. Nonlinear unsharp masking for mammogram enhancement. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 15(6):918–928. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5981393/
  • Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Costaridou L. 2008. Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques. Comput Biol Med. 38(10):1045–1055. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.07.006.
  • Perona P, Malik J. 1990. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 12(7):629–639. doi:10.1109/34.56205.
  • Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, Yaffe MJ, Aylward SR, Maidment ADA, Johnston RE, Williams MB, Niklason LT, Conant EF, et al. 2000. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 20(5):1479–1491. doi:10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se311479.
  • Pisano ED, Zong S, Hemminger BM, DeLuca M, Johnston RE, Muller K, Braeuning MP, Pizer SM. 1998. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 11(4):193–200. doi:10.1007/BF03178082.
  • Quintanilla-Dominguez J, Ojeda-Magañ B, Cortina-Januchs MG, Ruelas R, Vega-Corona A, Andina D. 2011. Image segmentation by fuzzy and possibilistic clustering algorithms for the identification of microcalcifications. Sci Iran. 18(3 D):580–589. doi:10.1016/j.scient.2011.04.009.
  • Senthilkumar B, Umamaheswari G. 2015. Breast cancer detection using combined curvelet based enhancement and a novel segmentation methods. Biomed Pap. 159(1):83–86. doi:10.5507/bp.2013.097.
  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. 2020. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 70(1):7–30. https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21590
  • Singh B, Kaur M. 2017. An approach for enhancement of microcalcifications in mammograms. J Med Biol Eng. 37(4):567–579. doi:10.1007/s40846-017-0276-7.
  • Sondele S, Saini I. 2013. Classification of mammograms using bidimensional empirical mode decomposition based features and artificial neural network. Int J Bio-Sci Bio-Technol. 5(6):171–180. doi:10.14257/ijbsbt.2013.5.6.18.
  • Suppaya K, Nasir FM, Ghani AA. 2020. Variations of Bi-rads 5 in mammography by age, ethnicity, and breast density : a retrospective study in University Malaya Medical Centre. Asian J Med Biomed. 4(S1):11–16.
  • Suradi SH, Abdullah KA. 2021. Digital Mammograms with Image Enhancement Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review. Curr Med Imaging. 17.[accessed 2021 April 21]:[7 p.]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405617666210127101101
  • Zhuang, L., & Guan, Y. (2017). Image Enhancement via Subimage Histogram Equalization Based on Mean and Variance. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2017, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6029892

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.