Video based human crowd analysis using machine learning: a survey

References

• Adam A, Rivlin E, Shimshoni I, Reinitz D. 2008 Mar. Robust real-time unusual event detection using multiple fixed-location monitors. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 30(3):555–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70825.
   Google Scholar
• AlDahoul N, Md Sabri AQ, Mansoor AM. 2018 Feb. Real-time human detection for aerial captured video sequences via deep models. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018:1639561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1639561.
   Google Scholar
• Ali S, Shah M. 2008. Floor fields for tracking in high density crowd scenes. Lect Notes Comput Sci (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 5303(PART 2):1–14. LNCS.
   Google Scholar
• Amir Sjarif NN, Shamsuddin SM, Mohd Hashim SZ, Yuhaniz SS. 2011. Crowd analysis and its applications. In: Zain JM, bt Wan Mohd WM, El-Qawasmeh E, editors. Software engineering and computer systems (Vol. 179). Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 687–697.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade EL, Blunsden S, Fisher RB. 2006. Modelling crowd scenes for event detection. 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06). Hong Kong (China) p. 175–178. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icpr.2006.806
   Google Scholar
• Angelova A, Krizhevsky A, Vanhoucke V. 2015a. Pedestrian detection with a large-field-of-view deep network. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Seattle, WA (USA); p. 704–711.
   Google Scholar
• Angelova A, Krizhevsky A, Vanhoucke V, Ogale A, Ferguson D. 2015b. Real-time pedestrian detection with deep network cascades. Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2015. Swansea (UK); p. 32.1–32.12.
   Google Scholar
• Antoine F, Courty N, Racoceanu D, Dufour J, Antoine F, Courty N, Racoceanu D, Unsupervised JD. 2013. Unsupervised dense crowd detection by multi-scale texture analysis to cite this version: HAL Id: hal-00904210 unsupervised dense crowd detection by multiscale texture analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Benenson R, Mathias M, Timofte R, Gool LV, Ibbt E, Leuven KU. 2012. Pedestrian detection at 100 frames per second. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Providence, Rhode Island. p. 2903–2910.
   Google Scholar
• Benezeth Y, Jodoin PM, Saligrama V, Rosenberger C. 2009. Abnormal events detection based on spatio-temporal co-occurences. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miami, Florida(US);p. 2458–2465.
   Google Scholar
• Bera A, Galoppo N, Sharlet D, Lake A, Manocha D. 2014. AdaPT: real-time adaptive pedestrian tracking for crowded scenes. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p. 1801–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Boominathan L, Kruthiventi SSS, Babu RV. 2016. Crowdnet: a deep convolutional network for dense crowd counting. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference - MM ’16; New York, New York, USA. p. 640–644.
   Google Scholar
• Brostow GJ, Cipolla R. 2006. Unsupervised Bayesian detection of independent motion in crowds. 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR’06).; New York, NY, USA. p. 594–601.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AB, Vasconcelos N. 2012 Apr. Counting people with low-level features and Bayesian regression. IEEE Trans Image Process. 21(4):2160–2177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2172800.
   Google Scholar
• Chang H, Yeung D-Y, Xiong Y. 2004. Super-resolution through neighbor embedding. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004; CVPR 2004.; Washington,DC, USA. p. 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-Y, Shao Y. 2015 Apr. Crowd escape behavior detection and localization based on divergent centers. IEEE Sens J. 15(4):2431–2439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2381260.
   Google Scholar
• Chen K, Gong S, Xiang T, Loy CC. 2013. Cumulative attribute space for age and crowd density estimation. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Portland, OR, USA. p. 2467–2474.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Fern A, Todorovic S. 2015. Person count localization in videos from noisy foreground and detections. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); Boston, MA, USA. p. 1364–1372.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Qin Z, An L, Bhanu B. 2014. An online learned elementary grouping model for multi-target tracking. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Columbus, OH, USA. p. 1242–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Cho S-H, Kang H-B. 2014 Jul. Abnormal behavior detection using hybrid agents in crowded scenes. Pattern Recognit Lett. 44:64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.11.017.
   Google Scholar
• Choi W, Shahid K, Savarese S. 2009. What are they doing?: collective activity classification using spatio-temporal relationship among people. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops.; Kyoto, Japan. p. 1282–1289.
   Google Scholar
• Colque RVHM, Caetano C, de Andrade MTL, Schwartz WR. 2017 Mar. Histograms of optical flow orientation and magnitude and entropy to detect anomalous events in videos. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 27(3):673–682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2637778.
   Google Scholar
• Cong Y, Yuan J, Tang Y. 2013 Oct. Video anomaly search in crowded scenes via spatio-temporal motion context. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Secur. 8(10):1590–1599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2013.2272243.
   Google Scholar
• Cong Z, Li H, Wang X, Yang X. 2015. Cross-scene crowd counting via deep convolutional neural networks. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).; Boston, MA, USA; p. 833–841.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghan A, Shah M. 2018. Binary quadratic programing for online tracking of hundreds of people in extremely crowded scenes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 40(3):568–581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2687462.
   Google Scholar
• Dollár P, Wojek C, Schiele B, Perona P. 2012 Apr. Pedestrian detection: an evaluation of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 34(4):743–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.155.
   Google Scholar
• Du X, El-Khamy M, Lee J, Davis L. 2017. Fused DNN: a deep neural network fusion approach to fast and robust pedestrian detection. 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).; Santa Rosa, California, USA; p. 953–961.
   Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Zhu Y, Song Y, Liu Z. 2020 Apr. Generating high quality crowd density map based on perceptual loss. Appl Intell. 50(4):1073–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01573-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fradi H, Luvison B, Pham QC. 2017 Mar. Crowd behavior analysis using local mid-level visual descriptors. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 27(3):589–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2615443.
   Google Scholar
• Fu M, Xu P, Li X, Liu Q, Ye M, Zhu C. 2015 Aug. Fast crowd density estimation with convolutional neural networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 43:81–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ge W, Collins RT. 2009. Marked point processes for crowd counting. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Miami, FL. p. 2913–2920.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger A, Lenz P, Urtasun R. 2012. Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Providence, RI, USA; p. 3354–3361.
   Google Scholar
• Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J. 2014. R-CNN rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Columbus, OH, USA. p. 580–587.
   Google Scholar
• Gong M, Shu Y. 2020. Real-time detection and motion recognition of human moving objects based on deep learning and multiscale feature fusion in video. IEEE Access. 8:25811–25822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971283.
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Wu X, Cao T, Yu S, Xu Y. 2010. Crowd density estimation via Markov Random Field (MRF). 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Jinan, China.p. 258–263.
   Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Xu Z-J, Liu Y, Wang J, Fan J-L. 2019 Feb. Effective crowd anomaly detection through spatio-temporal texture analysis. Int J Autom Comput. 16(1):27–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-018-1141-z.
   Google Scholar
• Hassner T, Itcher Y, Kliper-Gross O. 2012. Violent flows: real-time detection of violent crowd behavior. 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. p. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239348.
   Google Scholar
• Held D, Thrun S, Savarese S. 2016. Learning to track at 100 FPS with deep regression networks. In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, Welling M, editors. Computer vision – ECCV 2016 (Vol. 9905). Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 749–765.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques JF, Caseiro R, Martins P, Batista J. 2015 Mar. High-speed tracking with kernelized correlation filters. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 37(3):583–596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2345390.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Wang P, Shen C, van den Hengel A, Porikli F. 2018a Jun. Pushing the limits of deep cnns for pedestrian detection. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 28(6):1358–1368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2017.2648850.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Huang Y, Duan Q, Ci W, Dai J, Yang H. 2018b Dec. Abnormal event detection in crowded scenes using histogram of oriented contextual gradient descriptor. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2018(1):54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13634-018-0574-4.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Hu X, Zhang H, Wu H, Hu S. 2016 Jun. Video anomaly detection using deep incremental slow feature analysis network. IET Comput Vis. 10(4):258–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cvi.2015.0271.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Park J, Kim N, Choi Y, Kweon IS. 2015. Multispectral pedestrian detection: benchmark dataset and baseline. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Boston, MA, USA. p. 1037–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Idrees H, Tayyab M, Athrey K, Zhang D, Al-Maadeed S, Rajpoot N, Shah M. 2018. Composition loss for counting, density map estimation and localization in dense crowds. In: Ferrari V, Hebert M, Sminchisescu C, Weiss Y, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2018: 15th European Conference, Munich, Germany, September 8-14, 2018, Proceedings, Part II (vol. 11206); Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Idrees H, Saleemi I, Seibert C, Shah M. 2013 Multi-source multi-scale counting in extremely dense crowd images. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Portland, OR, USA. p. 2547–2554.
   Google Scholar
• Idrees H, Warner N, Shah M. 2014 Jan. Tracking in dense crowds using prominence and neighborhood motion concurrence. Image Vis Comput. 32(1):14–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2013.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ilg E, Mayer N, Saikia T, Keuper M, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T. 2017. FlowNet 2.0: evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Honolulu, HI, USA. p. 1647–1655.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Xiao Z, Zhang B, Zhen X, Cao X, Doermann D, Shao L. 2019. Crowd counting and density estimation by trellis encoder-decoder networks. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Long Beach, CA, USA. p. 6126–6135.
   Google Scholar
• Kang D, Ma Z, Chan AB. 2019 May. Beyond counting: comparisons of density maps for crowd analysis tasks—counting, detection, and tracking. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 29(5):1408–1422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2837153.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MUK, Park H-S, Kyung C-M. 2019 Feb. Rejecting motion outliers for efficient crowd anomaly detection. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Secur. 14(2):541–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2018.2856189.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Hong HG, Park KR. 2017 May. Convolutional Neural Network-Based Human Detection in Nighttime Images Using Visible Light Camera Sensors. Sens Basel Sens. 17(5), 1065.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz L, Nishino K. 2009. Anomaly detection in extremely crowded scenes using spatio-temporal motion pattern models. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Miami, FL. p. 1446–1453, doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206771.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaridis L, Dimou A, Daras P. Abnormal behavior detection in crowded scenes using density heatmaps and optical flow. 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2018. Rome, Italy. p. 2060–2064.
   Google Scholar
• Lempitsky V, Zisserman A. 2010a. Learning to count objects in images. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23: 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2010, NIPS 2010. Whistler, Canada. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lempitsky V, Zisserman A. 2010b. Learning to count objects in images. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 1); Red Hook, NY, USA. p. 1324–1332.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang X, Chen D. 2018. Csrnet: dilated convolutional neural networks for understanding the highly congested scenes. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA. p. 1091–1100.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang S, Wang S, Metaxas D. 2016a. Multispectral deep neural networks for pedestrian detection. Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016. York, UK. p. 73.1–73.13.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ouyang W, Wang X, Fieguth P, Chen J, Liu X, Pietikäinen M. 2019 Oct. Deep learning for generic object detection: a survey. Int J Comput Vis. 128, 261-318
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Xie K, Zhu Z, Ma D. 2016b. Research on the estimation of crowd density based on video image processing. 2016 International Conference on Industrial Informatics - Computing Technology, Intelligent Technology, Industrial Information Integration (ICIICII). p. 10–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIICII.2016.0014
   Google Scholar
• Loy CC, Gong S, Xiang T. 2013. From semi-supervised to transfer counting of crowds. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Sydney, Australia. p. 2256–2263.
   Google Scholar
• Luo P, Tian Y, Wang X, Tang X. 2014a. Switchable deep network for pedestrian detection. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Columbus, OH, USA. p. 899–906.
   Google Scholar
• Luo W, Xing J, Milan A, Zhang X, Liu W, Zhao X, Kim T-K. 2014b. Multiple object tracking: a literature review.
   Google Scholar
• Ma C, Yang X, Zhang C, Yang M-H. 2015. Long-term correlation tracking. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Boston, MA, USA. p. 5388–5396.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevan V, Li W, Bhalodia V, Vasconcelos N. 2010. Anomaly detection in crowded scenes. 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Francicso, CA. p. 1975–1981.
   Google Scholar
• Marana AN, Cavenaghi MA, Ulson RS, Drumond FL. 2005. Real-time crowd density estimation using images. p. 355–362
   Google Scholar
• Martin DR, Fowlkes CC, Malik J. 2004 May. Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 26(5):530–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1273918.
   Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Oyama A, Shah M. 2009. Abnormal crowd behavior detection using social force model. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miami, FL. p. 935–942.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. 2002. An affine invariant interest point detector. In: Heyden A, Sparr G, Nielsen M, Johansen P, editors. Computer vision — ECCV 2002: 7th european conference on computer vision copenhagen, denmark, may 28–31,2002 proceedings, part I (vol. 2350); Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Nikouei SY, Chen Y, Song S, Xu R, Choi B-Y, Faughnan TR. 2018. Real-time human detection as an edge service enabled by a lightweight CNN. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE). San Francicso, CA, USA. p. 125–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ogale N. 2008. A survey of techniques for human detection from video.
   Google Scholar
• Oñoro-Rubio D, López-Sastre RJ. 2016. Towards perspective-free object counting with deep learning. In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, Welling M, editors. Computer vision – ECCV 2016 (Vol. 9911). Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 615–629.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang W, Wang X. 2013. Joint deep learning for pedestrian detection. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Sydney, Australia. p. 2056–2063.
   Google Scholar
• Pai AK, Karunakar AK, Raghavendra U. 2017. A novel crowd density estimation technique using local binary pattern and gabor features. 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). Lecce, Italy. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Paul M, Haque SME, Chakraborty S. 2013 Dec. Human detection in surveillance videos and its applications - a review. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2013(1):176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2013-176.
   Google Scholar
• Peleshko D, Soroka K. 2013. Research of usage of Haar-like features and AdaBoost algorithm in Viola-Jones method of object detection. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on the Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM). United States.
   Google Scholar
• Pham V-Q, Kozakaya T, Yamaguchi O, Okada R. 2015. COUNT forest: CO-voting uncertain number of targets using random forest for crowd density estimation. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Santiago, Chile. p. 3253–3261.
   Google Scholar
• Prasanna D, Prabhakar M. 2018. An effiecient human tracking system using Haar-like and hog feature extraction. Cluster Comput. (Vol. 22) Jan:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Qi M, Wang Y, Qin J, Li A, Luo J, Van Gool L. 2020 Feb. stagNet: an Attentive Semantic RNN for Group Activity and Individual Action Recognition. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 30(2):549–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2894161.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiee H, Haddadnia J, Mousavi H, Kalantarzadeh M, Nabi M, Murino V. 2016. Novel dataset for fine-grained abnormal behavior understanding in crowd. 2016 13th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). Colorado Springs, Colorado. p. 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavachari C, Aparna V, Chithira S, Balasubramanian V. 2015. A comparative study of vision based human detection techniques in people counting applications. Procedia Comput Sci. 58:461–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.064.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Vision C, Human B, InternationalJournal of Engineering and Information Syatem(IJEAIS). D. 2017. HAL Id: hal-01571292 computer vision based human detection. 1(5):62–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rao AS, Gubbi J, Marusic S, Palaniswami M. 2015 Nov. Estimation of crowd density by clustering motion cues. Vis Comput. 31(11):1533–1552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-014-1032-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ren W, Kang D, Tang Y, Chan AB. 2018. Fusing crowd density maps and visual object trackers for people tracking in crowd scenes. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA. p. 5353–5362.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Laptev I, Sivic J, Audibert J-Y. 2011. Density-aware person detection and tracking in crowds. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. Barcelona. p. 2423–2430.
   Google Scholar
• Roweis ST, Saul LK. 2000 Dec. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science. 290(5500):2323–2326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2323.
   Google Scholar
• Sabokrou M, Fathy M, Hoseini M, Klette R. 2015. Real-time anomaly detection and localization in crowded scenes. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). Boston, MA, USA. p. 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem MS, Khan MJ, Khurshid K, Hanif MS. 2019. Crowd density estimation in still images using multiple local features and boosting regression ensemble. Neural Comput Applic.(Vol 32). Jan:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh SAM, Suandi SA, Ibrahim H. 2015 May. Recent survey on crowd density estimation and counting for visual surveillance. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 41:103–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• Sam DB, Surya S, Babu RV. 2017. Switching convolutional neural network for crowd counting. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Honolulu, HI, USA. p. 4031–4039.
   Google Scholar
• Savitha C, Ramesh D. 2019 Nov. Distribution based crowd abnormality detection. IJITEE. 9(1):188–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A3977.119119.
   Google Scholar
• Shang C, Ai H, Bai B. 2016. End-to-end crowd counting via joint learning local and global count. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). Phoenix, Arizona. p. 1215–1219.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Loy CC, Wang X. 2014. Scene-independent group profiling in crowd.2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Columbus, OH, USA. p. 2227–2234.
   Google Scholar
• Shi X, Chen Z, Wang H, Yeung DY, Wong WK, Woo WC. 2015. Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015-Janua:802–810.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. p. 1–14, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi VA, Patel VM. 2017a Jul. A survey of recent advances in CNN-based single image crowd counting and density estimation. Pattern Recognit Lett., 107, 3-16.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi VA, Patel VM. 2017b. CNN-based cascaded multi-task learning of high-level prior and density estimation for crowd counting. 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). Leece, Italy. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi VA, Patel VM2017c. Generating high-quality crowd density maps using contextual pyramid CNNs. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Venice, Italy. p. 1879–1888.
   Google Scholar
• Smeulders AWM, Chu DM, Cucchiara R, Calderara S, Dehghan A, Shah M. 2014 Jul. Visual tracking: an experimental survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.36(7):1442–1468.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenu G, Saleem Durai MA. 2019 Dec. Intelligent video surveillance: a review through deep learning techniques for crowd analysis. J Big Data. 6(1):48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0212-5.
   Google Scholar
• Subburaman VB, Descamps A, Carincotte C. 2012. Counting people in the crowd using a generic head detector. 2012 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance. Beijing, China. p. 470–475.
   Google Scholar
• Sultani W, Chen C, Shah M. Real-world anomaly detection in surveillance videos, in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA. p. 6479–6488.
   Google Scholar
• Surasak T, Takahiro I, Cheng C, Wang C, Sheng P. 2018. Histogram of oriented gradients for human detection in video. 2018 5th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR). Bangkok, Thailand. p. 172–176.
   Google Scholar
• T. Corporation and Princeton. 2000. A system for video surveillance and monitoring. Collins-2000-8029.
   Google Scholar
• Tang S, Andriluka M, Schiele B. 2014 Oct. Detection and tracking of occluded people. Int J Comput Vis. 110(1):58–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-013-0664-6.
   Google Scholar
• UCSD. UCSD anomaly detection dataset. [Online]. [Accessed: 2019 Dec 11]. Available: http://www.svcl.ucsd.edu/projects/anomaly/dataset.htm
   Google Scholar
• Velastin SA, Yin JH, Davies AC. 1995 Feb. Crowd monitoring using image processing. Electron Commun Eng J. 7(1):37–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/ecej:19950106.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent P, Larochelle H, Lajoie I, Bengio Y, Manzagol PA. 2010. Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J Mach Learn Res. 11:3371–3408.
   Google Scholar
• Viola P, Jones MJ, Snow D. 2005 Jul. Detecting pedestrians using patterns of motion and appearance. Int J Comput Vis. 63(2):153–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-005-6644-8.
   Google Scholar
• Walach E, Wolf L. 2016. Learning to count with CNN boosting. In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, Welling M, editors. Computer vision – ECCV 2016 (Vol. 9906). Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 660–676.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang H, Yang L, Liu S, Cao X. 2015. Deep people counting in extremely dense crowds. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia - MM ’15. New York, New York, USA. p. 1299–1302.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xu Z. 2016 Mar. Spatio-temporal texture modelling for real-time crowd anomaly detection. Comput Vis Image Underst. 144:177–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2015.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zou Y. 2016. Fast visual object counting via example-based density estimation. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). Phoenix, Arizona. p. 3653–3657.
   Google Scholar
• Wojek C, Walk S, Schiele B. 2009. Multi-cue onboard pedestrian detection. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miami, FL. p. 794–801.
   Google Scholar
• World Population Review. World population 2020 (demographics, maps, graphs). [Online]. [Accessed: 2020 Jun 11]. Available: https://worldpopulationreview.com/continents/world-population/
   Google Scholar
• Worldometer. Worldometer - real time world statistics. [Online]. [Accessed: 2020 Jun 11]. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Lim J, Yang M-H. 2013. Online object tracking: a benchmark. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Portland, OR, USA. p. 2411–2418.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong F, Shi X, Yeung D-Y. 2017. Spatiotemporal modeling for crowd counting in videos. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Venice, Italy. p. 5161–5169.
   Google Scholar
• Xu B, Qiu G. 2016. Crowd density estimation based on rich features and random projection forest. 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). Lake Placid, NY, USA. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Xu D, Yan Y, Ricci E, Sebe N. 2017 Mar. Detecting anomalous events in videos by learning deep representations of appearance and motion. Comput Vis Image Underst. 156:117–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2016.10.010.
   Google Scholar
• Yaobin M, Tong J, Xiang W. 2010. Estimation of crowd density using multi-local features and regression. 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Jinan, China. p. 6295–6300.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan B, Monekosso DN, Remagnino P, Velastin SA, Xu L-Q. 2008 Oct. Crowd analysis: a survey. Mach Vis Appl. 19(5–6):345–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-008-0132-4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lin L, Liang X, He K. 2016a. Is faster R-CNN doing well for pedestrian detection? In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, Welling M, editors. Computer vision – ECCV 2016 (Vol. 9906). Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 443–457.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhou D, Chen S, Gao S, Ma Y. 2016b. Single-image crowd counting via multi-column convolutional neural network. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV, USA. p. 589–597.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z-Q, Zheng P, Xu S-T, Wu X. 2019 Jan. Object detection with deep learning: a review. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 30(11):3212–3232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876865.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Shen W, Zeng D, Fang M, Wei Y, Zhang Z. 2016 Sep. Spatial–temporal convolutional neural networks for anomaly detection and localization in crowded scenes. Signal Processing: Image Communication. 47:358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Zitouni MS, Bhaskar H, Dias J, Al-Mualla ME. 2016 Apr. Advances and trends in visual crowd analysis: a systematic survey and evaluation of crowd modelling techniques. Neurocomputing. 186:139–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.070.
   Google Scholar