Magnetic tracking using a modular C++ environment for image-guided interventions

References

• Akhtar Y, Dakua SP, Abdalla A, Aboumarzouk OM, Ansari MY, Abinahed J, Mohamed Elakkad MS, Al-Ansari A. 2021. Risk assessment of Computer-Aided diagnostic software for hepatic resection. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 1–1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3071148.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Anser EMT | Open Science Framework’. n.d. Accessed 2021 Jul 16. https://osf.io/47q8q/
   Google Scholar
• Askeland C, Solberg OV, Lervik Bakeng JB, Reinertsen I, Arne Tangen G, Hofstad EF, Høyer Iversen D, Våpenstad C, Selbekk T, Langø T, et al. 2016. CustusX: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 11(4):505–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1292-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bien T, Mengfei L, Salah Z, Rose G. 2014. Electromagnetic tracking system with reduced distortion using quadratic excitation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 9(2):323–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0925-4.
   Google Scholar
• Brown A, Uneri A, De Silva T, Manbachi A, Siewerdsen JH. 2018. Design and validation of an open-source library of dynamic reference frames for research and education in optical tracking. J Med Imaging. 5:2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021215.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaliere M, Jaeger HA, O’Donoghue K, Pádraig C-M. 2021. Planar body-mounted sensors for electromagnetic tracking. Sensors. 21(8):2822. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082822.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaliere M, Oisín Mcveigh H, Jaeger A, Hinds S, O’Donoghue K, Pádraig C-M. 2020. Inductive sensor design for electromagnetic tracking in image guided interventions. IEEE Sens J. 1–1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2984323.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary K, Peters TM. 2010. Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 12(1):119–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105249.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis G, De Angelis A, Moschitta A, Carbone P. 2017. Comparison of measurement models for 3D magnetic localization and tracking. Sensors. 17(11):2527. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112527.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Electromagnetic Measurement Systems’. n.d. NDI Europe GmbH (blog). Accessed 2021 Aug 24. https://www.ndieurope.com/products/electromagnetic-products/.
   Google Scholar
• Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, Cleary K, Peters TM, Maier-Hein. L. 2014. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine—A review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 33(8):1702–1725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777.
   Google Scholar
• Franz AM, Jaeger HA, Seitel A, Cantillon-Murphy P, Maier-Hein. L. 2019. Open-source tracked ultrasound with anser electromagnetic tracking. In: Handels H, Deserno TM, Maier A, Maier-Hein KH, Palm C, Tolxdorff T, editors. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019. Informatik aktuell. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. p. 232–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_52.
   Google Scholar
• Guennebaud G, Jacob B. 2010. ‘Eigen V3ʹ. 2010. https://eigen.tuxfamily.org. Accessed 2021 Oct 30.
   Google Scholar
• Halabi O, Balakrishnan S, Dakua SP, Navab N, Warfa M. 2020. Virtual and augmented reality in surgery. In: Doorsamy W, Paul BS, Marwala T, editors. The disruptive fourth industrial revolution: technology, society and beyond. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 257–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48230-5_11.
   Google Scholar
• Haus HA, Melcher JR. 1989. Electromagnetic Fields and Energy, Vol. 107. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs: NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger HA, Cantillon-Murphy P. 2019. Electromagnetic tracking using modular, tiled field generators. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 68(12):4845–4852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2900884.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger HA, Franz AM, O’Donoghue K, Seitel A, Trauzettel F, Maier-Hein L, Pádraig C-M. 2017. Anser EMT: the first open-source electromagnetic tracking platform for image-Guided Interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 12:1059–1067. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1568-7.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger HA, Hinds S, Pádraig C-M. 2018. An open framework enabling electromagnetic tracking in image-guided interventions. In: Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). p. 11073 LNCS:168–75. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger HA, Pádraig C-M. 2018. Distorter characterisation using mutual inductance in electromagnetic tracking. Sensors. 18(9):3059. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093059.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger HA, Trauzettel F, Nardelli P, Daverieux F, Hofstad EF, Leira HO, Kennedy MP, Langø T, Pádraig C-M. 2019. Peripheral tumour targeting using open-source virtual bronchoscopy with electromagnetic tracking: a multi-user pre-clinical study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 28(6):363–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2018.1544911.
   Google Scholar
• Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG. 2014. 3D slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Jolesz FA, editor. Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy. New York (NY): Springer; p. 277–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee MW. 2014. Fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography with CT or MRI for hepatic intervention. Ultrasonography. 33(4):227–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.14021.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg K. 1944. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math. 2(2):164–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/10666.
   Google Scholar
• Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G. 2015. Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 10(3):253–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1110-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield H, Cantillon-Murphy P, Griffiths J, Eustace D, O’Shea M, O’Donoghue K, Power T. 2014. Catheter position tracking system using planar magnetics and closed loop current control. IEEE Trans Magn. 50(7):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2014.2304271.
   Google Scholar
• Peters T, Cleary K. eds. 2008. Image-guided interventions: technology and applications. New York (NY): Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Plotkin A, Shafrir O, Paperno E, Kaplan DM. 2010. Magnetic eye tracking: a new approach employing a planar transmitter. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 57(5):1209–1215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2038495.
   Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, Walker S, O’Malley M, Lumsden A, Bismuth J. 2017. Flexible robotics with electromagnetic tracking improves safety and efficiency during in vitro endovascular navigation. J Vasc Surg. 65(2):530–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.045.
   Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, Virmani N, Walker S, O’Malley M, Lumsden AB, Bismuth J. 2018. Electromagnetic tracking of flexible robotic catheters enables “Assisted navigation” and brings automation to endovascular navigation in an in vitro study. J Vasc Surg. 67(4):1274–1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.072.
   Google Scholar
• Shafrir O, Paperno E, Plotkin A. 2010. Magnetic Tracking with a Flat Transmitter. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. https://www.morebooks.shop/store/gb/book/magnetic-tracking-with-a-flat-transmitter/isbn/978-3-8383-4436–2. Accessed 2021 Oct 30.
   Google Scholar
• Sonntag CLW, Sprée M, Lomonova EA, Duarte JL, Vandenput AJA. 2007. ‘Accurate magnetic field intensity calculations for contactless energy transfer coils’. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields. Achen, Germany, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sorriento A, Porfido MB, Mazzoleni S, Calvosa G, Tenucci M, Ciuti G, Dario P. 2020. Optical and electromagnetic tracking systems for biomedical applications: a critical review on potentialities and limitations. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 13:212–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2019.2939091.
   Google Scholar
• Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X, Yaniv Z, Ibanez L, Cheng P, Liu H, Blevins J, Arata J, Golby AJ, et al. 2009. OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Rob Comput Assisted Surg. 5(4):423–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.274.
   Google Scholar
• Ungi T, Lasso A, Fichtinger G. 2016. Open-source platforms for navigated image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal, 20th anniversary of the Medical Image Analysis journal (MedIA). 33(October):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.06.011.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum G, Drake FL. 2009. Python 3 Referencess Manual. Scotts Valley (CA): CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson E, Yaniv Z, Lindisch D, Cleary K. 2008. A buyer’s guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications. In: Medical imaging 2008: visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling. San Diego, California, United States: International Society for Optics and Photonics; p. 6918:69182B. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770509.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, Nolden M, Böttger T, Hastenteufel M, Schöbinger M, Kunert T, Meinzer H-P, Krebsforschungszentrum D. n.d. ‘The medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK) – a Toolkit facilitating the creation of interactive software by extending VTK and ITK’.
   Google Scholar
• Yaniv Z, Wilson E, Lindisch D, Cleary K. 2009. Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment: electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med Phys. 36(3):876–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3075829.
   Google Scholar