Patient positioning by visualising surgical robot rotational workspace in augmented reality

References

• Baek K, Deibel W, Marinov D, Griessen M, Dard M, Bruno A, Zeilhofer HF, Cattin P, Juergens P. 2015. A comparative investigation of bone surface after cutting with mechanical tools and er: yag laser. Lasers Surg Med. 47(5):426–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22352.
   Google Scholar
• Binbosayes A. 2018. Comparison between laparoendoscopic single- site surgery and the conventional total extraperitoneal technique in adult patients for inguinal hernia repair concerning postoperative pain, complications, and cosmesis: a literature review. MOJ Surg. 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.15406/mojs.2018.06.00135.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C, Steinberg Z, Shah A, Gundeti MS. 2014. Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol. 28(6):631–638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0733.
   Google Scholar
• Cofran L, Cohen T, Alfred M, Kanji F, Choi E, Savage S, Anger J, Catchpole K. 2021. Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking. Surg Endosc. 35:1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08131-0.
   Google Scholar
• Croci DM, Guzman R, Netzer C, Mariani L, Schaeren S, Cattin PC, Jost GF. 2020. Novel patient-specific 3d-virtual reality visualisation software (spectovr) for the planning of spine surgery: a case series of eight patients. BMJ Innovations. 6(4):215–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000398.
   Google Scholar
• George EI, Brand CTC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM. 2018. Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. JSLS. 22(4):e2018.00039. doi:https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Gerup J, Soerensen CB, Dieckmann P. 2020. Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review. Int J Med Edu. 11:1. doi:https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.eb1a.
   Google Scholar
• Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME. 2010. Set-up and docking of the da vinci® surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot Comp Assisted Surg. 6(1):57–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.288.
   Google Scholar
• Kandil E, Noureldine S, Saggi B, Buell J. 2013. Robotic liver resection: initial experience with three-arm robotic and single-port robotic technique. JSLS. 17:56–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317671.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht S, Brantner P, Cattin P, Tobler D, Kühne M, Sticherling C. 2019. State-of-the-art multimodality approach to assist ablations in complex anatomies—from 3d printing to virtual reality. Pacing Clin Electro- Physiol. 42(1):101–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13479.
   Google Scholar
• Levoy M. 1988. Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 8(3):29–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/38.511.
   Google Scholar
• Makhal A, and Goins AK 2018. Reuleaux: robot base placement by reachability analysis. 2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) Laguna Hills, CA, USA. p. 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mills JT, Burris MB, Warburton DJ, Conaway MR, Schenkman NS, Krupski TL. 2013. Positioning injuries associated with robotic assisted urological surgery. J Urol. 190(2):580–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3185.
   Google Scholar
• Porges O, Stouraitis T, Borst C, and Roa MA 2014. Reachability and capability analysis for manipulation tasks. ROBOT2013: First Iberian robotics conference Madrit, Spain. Springer. p. 703–718.
   Google Scholar
• Rao PP. 2018. Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition! World J Urol. 36(4):537–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2213-y.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Thompson S, Gurusamy K, Stoyanov D, Hawkes D, Clarkson M, Davidson B. 2019. Evaluation of an augmented reality based image guidance system for laparoscopic liver surgery. HPB. 21:S671–S672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.471.
   Google Scholar
• Schukfeh N, Kuebler JF, Dingemann J, and Ure BM. 2019. Thirty years of minimally invasive surgery in children: analysis of meta-analyses. Eur J Pediat Surg 30 (5): 420–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687901 .
   Google Scholar
• Thiruchelvam N, Lee SY, and Chiow AKH. 2021. Patient and port positioning in laparoscopic liver resections. Hepatoma Res, 7: 22. doi:https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.144 .
   Google Scholar
• Vahrenkamp N, Muth D, Kaiser P, and Asfour T 2015. Ik-map: an enhanced workspace representation to support inverse kinematics solvers. 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) Seoul, Korea. p. 785–790.
   Google Scholar
• van der Schans EM, Hiep MA, Consten EC, Broeders IA. 2020. From da vinci si to da vinci xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot. J Robot Surg. 14(6):835–839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8.
   Google Scholar
• Virga S, Zettinig O, Esposito M, Pfister K, Frisch B, Neff T, Navab N, and Hennersperger C 2016. Automatic force-compliant robotic ultrasound screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) Daejeon, Korea. p. 508–513.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharias F, Borst C, and Hirzinger G 2007. Capturing robot workspace structure: representing robot capabilities. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA. IEEE. p. 3229–3236.
   Google Scholar