Genetic algorithm for feature selection in mammograms for breast masses classification

References

• Abdel-Nasser M, Rashwan HA, Puig D, Moreno A. 2015. Analysis of tissue abnormality and breast density in mammographic images using a uniform local directional pattern. Expert Syst Appl. 42(24):9499–9511. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Azzam N, Shatnawi I. 2021. Comparing supervised and semi-supervised machine learning models on diagnosing breast cancer. Annals Of Medicine And Surgery. 62:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Masni MA. 2017. Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in digital mammograms via regional convolutional neural network. Proceedings of 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
   Google Scholar
• Amara N, Shoaib M, Gattoufi S. 2018. Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in digital mammograms via linear support vector machine. IEEE 4th Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering (MECBME); 28-30 March 2018; Tunis, Tunisia. IEEE. p. 141–146. doi: 10.1109/MECBME.2018.8402422.
   Google Scholar
• Bacha S, Taouali O. 2022. A novel machine learning approach for breast cancer diagnosis. Measurement. 187:110233. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beura S, Majhi B, Dash R. 2015. Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer. Neurocomputing. 154:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltrass Ahamed S, Mohamed SS. 2019. Fully automated scheme for computer-aided detection and breast cancer diagnosis using digitised mammograms. Iet Image Process. 14(3):495–505. doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan K, Rajendra AU, Chua Kuang C, Lim Choo M, Thomas AK, Kwan-Hoong. 2012. Computer-aided breast cancer detection using mammograms: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 6:77–98. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2012.2232289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta SR. 2022. Prediction time of breast cancer tumor recurrence using machine learning. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 32:100602. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hai J, Tan H, Chen J, Wu M, Qiao K, Xu J, Zeng L, Gao F, Shi D, Yan B, et al. 2019. Multi-level features combined end-to-end learning for automated pathological grading of breast cancer on digital mammograms. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 71:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homayoun C, Kuzan. 2022. Applications of machine-learning algorithms for prediction of benign and malignant breast lesions using ultrasound radiomics signatures: a multi-center study.Biocybernetics and. Biomed Eng. 42(3):921–933. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2022.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Houssein EH, Emam MM, Ali AA, Suganthan PN. 2021. Deep and machine learning techniques for medical imaging-based breast cancer: a comprehensive review. Expert Syst Appl. 167:114161. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Sahu S 2021. Analysis of different machine learning classifiers on MP election commission and breast cancer big dataset. Proceedings of Materials Today; Bhopal, India. Vol. 81, Elsevier. p. 817–825. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.248.
   Google Scholar
• Kanya Kumari L, Naga Jagadesh B. 2022. An adaptive teaching learning based optimization technique for feature selection to classify mammogram medical images in breast cancer detection. Int J System Assur Eng Manag. 1:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01598-7.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Tang J. 2013. Mass classification in mammograms using selected geometry and texture features, and a new SVM-based feature selection method. IEEE Syst J. 8(3):910–920. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2286539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencattini A, Salmeri M, Rabottino G, Salicone S. 2010. Metrological characterization of a CADx system for the classification of breast masses in mammograms. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 59(11):2792–2799. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2010.2060751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosevic M, Jovanovic Z, Jankovic D. 2017. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification. Technol Health Care. 25(4):657–670. doi: 10.3233/THC-160805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed BA, Salem NM. 2018. Automatic classification of masses from digital mammograms. Proceedings of IEEE 35th National Radio Science Conference; Cairo. 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty F, Rup S, Dash B, Majhi B, Swamy. 2019. Mammogram classification using contourlet features with forest optimization-based feature selection approach. Multimed Tools Appl. 78(10):12805–12834. doi: 10.1007/s11042-018-5804-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muduli D, Dash R, Majhi B. 2020. Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms: a moth flame optimization based ELM approach. Biomed Signal Process Control. 59:101912. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muduli D, Dash R, Majhi B. 2021. Fast discrete curvelet transform and modified PSO based improved evolutionary extreme learning machine for breast cancer detection. Biomed Signal Process Control. 70:102919. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag K, Pal NR. 2015. A multiobjective genetic programming-based ensemble for simultaneous feature selection and classification. IEEE Trans Cybern. 46(2):499–510. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2404806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver A, Tortajada M, Lladó X, Freixenet J, Ganau S, Tortajada L, Vilagran M, Sentís M, Martí R. 2015. Breast density analysis using an automatic density segmentation algorithm. J Digit Imaging. 28(5):604–612. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9777-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian H, Mao Y, Xiang W, Wang Z. 2010. Recognition of human activities using SVM multi-class classifier. Pattern Recognit Lett. 31(2):100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhi R, Jafari M, Kasaei S, Keshavarzian P. 2015. Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and CNN segmentation. Expert Syst Appl. 42(3):990–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routray I, Prasad Rath N. 2018. Textural feature based classification of mammogram images using ANN. Proceedings of 9th IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies(ICCCNT); Bengaluru, India. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Salimian M, Rezai A, Hamidpour S, Khajeh-Khalili F 2019. Effective features in thermal images for breast cancer detection. Proceedings of 2nd National Conf. on New Technologies in Electrical and Computer Engineering; Tamilnadu, India.
   Google Scholar
• Sapate S, Talbar S, Mahajun A, Sable N, Desai S, Thakur M. 2020. Breast cancer diagnosis using abnormalities on ipsilateral views of digital mammograms. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 40(1):290–305. doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanbehzadeh M, Kazemi-Arpanahi H, Ghalibaf B, Orooji. 2022. Performance evaluation of machine learning for breast cancer diagnosis: a case study. Inform Med Unlocked. 31:101009. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101009.
   Google Scholar
• Shastri AA, Tamrakar D, Ahuja K. 2018. Density-wise two stage mammogram classification using texture exploiting descriptors. Expert Syst Appl. 99:71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaranjani K, Vaira Suganthi G, Sutha J. 2016. Breast cancer diagnosis in Mammography images using 2D-DWT and LESH feature extraction technique. Int J Eng Sci Comput. 6(6):7508–7512.
   Google Scholar
• Tang J, Rangayyan RM, Jun X, Naqa E, Issam, Yang Y. 2009. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 13(2):236–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tatikonda KC, Mohan Bhuma C, Kumar Samayamantula S. 2018. The analysis of digital mammograms using HOG and GLCM features.IEEE conference on computing. Commun Net Tech. 1:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• University of South Florida Digital Mammography Home Page. Univ.South Florida. 2000. [Online]. Available: http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/Mammography/Database.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vaira Suganthi G, Sutha J 2012. Classification of breast masses in mammograms using support vector machine. International Conference On Recent Advances And Future Trends In Information Technology (IRAFIT 2012) Proceedings Published In International Journal Of Computer Applications (IJCA); Tamilnadu, India. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vaira Suganthi G, Sutha J, Parvathy M. 2020. A survey on machine learning algorithms for the diagnosis of breast masses with mammograms. Curr Med Imaging. 16(6):639–652. doi: 10.2174/1573405615666190903141554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. 1998. Statistical learning theory. Newyork: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weston J, Watkins C. 1998. Multi-class support vector machines. Technical Report. Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Guan Q, Cheng AS, Guan C, Su Y, Jiang J, Zeng Y, Zeng L, Wang B. 2022. Comparison of machine learning models for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema in Chinese women. Asia-Pac J Oncol Nurs. 9(12):100101. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Yi-Chong. 2018. Mammogram density classification using Double support vector machines. Proceeding of IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics. 547–550.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li C, Peng D, Yi X, He S, Liu F, Zheng X, Huang WE, Zhao L, Huang X, et al. 2022. Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for the classification of breast cancers. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 264:120300. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Wang L. 2007. A modified T-test feature selection method and its application on the HapMap genotype data. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 5(3–4):242–249. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60011-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar