Comparing densely calculated facial soft tissue depths for craniofacial reconstruction: Euclidean vs. perpendicular distances

References

• Bruynooghe E, Keustermans J, Smeets D, Tilotta F, Claes P, Vandermeulen D. 2011. CT-based robust statistical shape modeling for forensic craniofacial reconstruction. 4th Int Conf Imag Crime Detect Prev 2011 (ICDP. 2011:29–34. (January).
   Google Scholar
• Campomanes-Alvarez BR, Cordón O, Damas S, Ibanez O, Campomanes-Álvarez BR, Cordón Ó, Damas S, Ibáñez Ó. 2014. Computer-based craniofacial superimposition in forensic identification using soft computing. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 5(5):683–697. doi: 10.1007/s12652-012-0168-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh D, Steyn M. 2011. Facial reconstruction: soft tissue thickness values for South African black females. Forensic Sci Int. 206(1–3):215.e1–215.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa BJ, Weathers WM, Wolfswinkel EM, Thornton JF. 2013. The forehead flap: the gold standard of nasal soft tissue reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 27(2):96–103. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Greef S, Claes P, Vandermeulen D, Mollemans W, Suetens P, Willems G. 2006. Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 159:S126–S146. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domaracki M, Stephan CN. 2006. Facial soft tissue thicknesses in Australian adult cadavers. J Forensic Sci. 51(1):5–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00009.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Huang L, Feng Z, Bai S, Wu G, Zhao Y. 2012. Influence of sex and body mass index on facial soft tissue thickness measurements of the northern Chinese adult population. Forensic Sci Int. 222(1–3):396.e1–396.e7. Internet. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt N, Kuttenberger J. 2010. Craniofacial trauma. Luzern, SwitzerlandBerlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kokemueller H, Tavassol F, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC. 2008. Complex midfacial reconstruction: a combined technique of computer-assisted surgery and microvascular tissue transfer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 66(11):2398–2406. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 20(1):62–66. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
   Google Scholar
• Panenková P, Beňuš R, Masnicová S, Obertová Z, Grunt J. 2012. Facial soft tissue thicknesses of the mid-face for Slovak population. Forensic Sci Int. 220(1–3):293.e1–293.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber JE, Stern CS, Garfein ES, Weichman KE, Tepper OM. 2016. A novel approach to surgical markings based on a topographic map and a projected three-dimensional image. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(5):855e–859e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrimpton S, Daniels K, de Greef S, Tilotta F, Willems G, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Claes P. 2014. A spatially-dense regression study of facial form and tissue depth: towards an interactive tool for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 234:103–110. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shui W, Zhou M, Deng Q, Wu Z, Ji Y, Li K, He T, Jiang H. 2016. Densely calculated facial soft tissue thickness for craniofacial reconstruction in Chinese adults. Forensic Sci Int. 266:.e573.1–.e573.12. [Internet]. 266 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan CN, Simpson EK, Byrd JE. 2013. Facial soft tissue depth statistics and enhanced point estimators for craniofacial identification: the debut of the shorth and the 75-shormax. J Forensic Sci. 58(6):1439–1457. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Surek CC, Garfein ES, Jelks EB, Jelks GW, Tepper OM. 2016. Three-dimensional topographic surface changes in response to compartmental volumization of the medial cheek: defining a malar augmentation zone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(5):1401–1408. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper OM, Sorice S, Hershman GN, Saadeh P, Levine JP, Hirsch D. 2011. Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 69(3):733–741. Internet. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teshima T, Patel V, Mainprize JG, Edwards G, Antonyshyn OM. 2015. A three-dimensional statistical average skull: application of biometric morphing in generating missing anatomy. J Craniofac Surg. 26(5):1634–1638. Internet. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilotta FM, Glaunès JA, Richard FJP, Rozenholc Y. 2010. A local technique based on vectorized surfaces for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 200(1–3):50–59. Internet. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0379073810001428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilotta F, Richard F, Glaunès J, Berar M, Gey S, Verdeille S, Rozenholc Y, Gaudy JF. 2009. Construction and analysis of a head CT-scan database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 191(1–3):.e112.1–.e112.12. Internet. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoss G, Studios D, Studios D, Bradley D, Zurich ETH, Studios D, Gross M, Zurich ETH, Beeler T, Studios D. 2019. ACM Trans Graph. 38(4):1–8. doi:10.1145/3306346.3323044
   Google Scholar