Total state in-migration rates and public policy in the United States: a comparative analysis of the Great Recession and the pre- and post-Great Recession years

References

• Ashby, N. J. (2007). Economic freedom and migration flows between U.S. states. Southern Economic Journal, 73(3), 677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., & Walsh, R. P. (2008). Do people vote with their feet? An empirical test of Tiebout’s mechanism. American Economic Review, 98(3), 843–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsby, S. L., & Cox, D. R. (1975). Interstate migration of the elderly. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1950). Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review, 54(5), 583–589.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, W., Detragiache, E., & Vishwanath, T. (1996). Migration and endogenous moving costs. American Economic Review, 86(4), 909–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J. (1978). An empirical note on the Tiebout-Tullock hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92(4), 705–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J. (1979). The determinants of human migration. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J. (1990). A brief empirical note on the Tiebout hypothesis and state income tax policies. Public Choice, 67(1), 87–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J., & Alexander, G. (2006). Determinants of net interstate migration, 2000–2004. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 27(2), 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J., & Belton, W. J. (1994). Voting with one’s feet: an analysis of public welfare and migration of the American Indian. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53(3), 273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J., & Vedder, R. K. (1973). A note on migration, economic opportunity, and the quality of life. Journal of Regional Science, 13(2), 205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, G., & Voss, P. R. (2005). Migration decision-making: a hierarchical regression approach. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 35(2), 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. E., & Hunter, W. J. (1992). The impact of economic opportunity, amenities, and fiscal factors in age-specific migration rates. Journal of Regional Science, 32(3), 349–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, J. E., & Madsen, R. A. (2012). U.S. state and regional economic impact of the 2008/2009 recession. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 42(3), 177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, K. S., & Houtenville, A. J. (1998). Do the elderly ‘vote with their feet’? Public Choice, 97(1), 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, K. S., & Houtenville, A. J. (2001). Elderly migration and state fiscal policy: evidence from the 1990 Census migration flows. National Tax Journal, 54(1), 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, K. S., & Houtenville, A. J. (2003). Out with the old, in with the old: a closer look at younger versus older elderly migration. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Community and Economic Research. (2013). Cost of living index. http://www.coli.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Economic Advisors. (2009). Economic report of the President, 2009. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. S., Greenwood, M. J., & Li, H. (2001). A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. Journal of Regional Science, 41(2), 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. (2007). Asymmetries in regional labor markets, migration, and economic geography. Annals of Regional Science, 41(1), 124–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Y., & Gabriel, S. A. (2013). Labor migration, human capital, agglomeration, and development in China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(3), 473–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, L. R., & Heath, W. C. (2000). Elderly internal migration in the U.S. revisited. Public Finance Review, 28(2), 153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K. V. (1977). Spillovers, migration, and public school expenditures: the repetition of an experiment. Public Choice, 29(1), 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2010). Regional resilience: a promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze, K. E. (1977). Net migration to metropolitan areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, C. E., Bin, O., Hindsley, P., Whitehead, J. C., & Wilson, K. (2007). Going home: evacuation migration decisions of Hurricane Katrina survivors. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 326–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. C. (1977). Local government finance and metropolitan employment growth: a simultaneous-equations model. Southern Economic Journal, 43(4), 1379–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2011). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis, and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, J. (2000). Migration and age: the effects of age on sensitivity to migration stimuli. Regional Studies, 34(4), 521–533.
   Google Scholar
• Nechyba, T. (2000). Mobility, targeting, and private-school vouchers. American Economic Review, 90(1), 130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack, J. R. (1973). Determinants of migration to central cities. Journal of Regional Science, 13(2), 249–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (2006). An SVAR model of fluctuations in U.S. migration flows and state labor markets. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 958–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. L., Hawkins, B. W., & Maier, P. E. (1995). Revisiting Tiebout: moving rationales and interjurisdictional relocation. Publius Journal of Federalism, 25(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, L. (2012). Gravity and spatial structures: the case of interstate migration in Mexico. Journal of Regional Science, 52(5), 819–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. J., Detang-Dessendre, C., Hunt, G. L., & Piguet, V. (2013). Housing prices and inter-urban migration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(2), 296–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renas, S. M. (1978). The cost of living, labor market opportunities, and the migration decision. Annals of Regional Science, 15(1), 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renas, S. M. (1980). An empirical note on the Tiebout-Tullock hypothesis: comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(3), 619–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renas, S. M. (1983). The cost of living, labor market opportunities, and the migration decision: more on problems of misspecification and aggregation bias. Annals of Regional Science, 17(1), 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode, P. W., & Strumpf, K. S. (2003). Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: local heterogeneity from 1950 to 1990. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1648–1677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riew, J. (1973). Migration and public policy. Journal of Regional Science, 12(2), 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz, I. S. (1998). State income taxation and geographic labor force mobility in the United States. Applied Economics Letters, 5(5), 599–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaastad, L. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(2), 80–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, P. M., & Suits, D. B. (1973). An analysis of net interstate migration. Southern Economic Journal, 40(2), 193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(1), 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. (1971). Public expenditures as public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 79(5), 913–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2001. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2008). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2009). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2009. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2010). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2011). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. (2010). State-to-state migration flows, 2010. http://www.State_to_State_Migrations_Table_2010/.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. (2011). State-to-state migration flows, 2011. http://www.State_to_State_Migrations_Table_2011/.
   Google Scholar
• Vedder, R. K. (1976). The American economy in historical perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Vedder, R. K., Gallaway, L. E., Graves, P. E., & Sexton, R. (1986). An historical perspective in interregional migration in the U.S. In R. J. Krumm (Ed.), Housing and migration (pp. 101–124). Mount Pleasant, MI: Blackstone.
   Google Scholar
• Walden, M. L. (2012). Explaining differences in state unemployment rates during the Great Recession. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 42(3), 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar