Regional state innovation in peripheral regions: enabling Lapland’s green policies

REFERENCES

• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arctic Smartness. (2015). Arctic Smartness portfolio, cluster report. Available at https://arcticsmartness.eu/publications/
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Retrieved April 29, 2020, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/edace3e3-e189-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-85471490
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Country Report for Finland. Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/2019-european-semester-country-report-finland_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2019). Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., McCann, P., & Morgan, K. (2020). Smart specialisation on the move: Reflections on six years of implementation and prospects for the future. Regional Studies, 1323–1327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817364
   Google Scholar
• Grundel, I., & Dahlström, M. (2016). A quadruple and quintuple helix approach to regional innovation systems in the transformation to a forestry-based bioeconomy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(4), 963–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunfelder, J., Norlén, G., Mikkola, N., Rispling, L., Teräs, J., & Wang, S. State of the Lapland Region. Nordregio report. https://lapinluotsi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/state-of-the-lapland-regionfinal-version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Spaces of innovation: Learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.672725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotnik, P., & Petrin, T. (2017). Implementing a smart specialisation strategy: An evidence-based approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315574994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapin AMK. (2019). Presentation and field visit at Karlstad University. Biorefinery investment plans in Lapland.
   Google Scholar
• Lapland Business. (n.d.). Industry brief: Forest sector and bioindustry in Lapland. Retrieved November 13, 2020, from https://www.lapland.fi/business/forest-sector-and-bioindustry
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography, 85(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäenpää, A., & Teräs, J. (2018). In search of domains in smart specialisation: Case study of three Nordic regions. European Journal of Spatial Development, 68, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30689/EJSD2018:68.1650-9544
   Google Scholar
• Martin, H. (2020). The scope of regional innovation policy to realize transformative change – a case study of the chemicals industry in western Sweden. European Planning Studies, 2409–2427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1722616
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of regions. Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2017). Policy learning and smart specialization: Balancing policy change and continuity for new regional industrial paths. Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 382–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales. (2020a). CRS Policy brief No. 1. Regional bioeconomies in Catalonia and Finnish Lapland. Available at https://www.kau.se/files/2020-03/CRS_PolicyBrief_nr1-2020_A4_2002%20-%20ENG_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morales. (2020b). CRS Policy brief No. 3. Public sector innovation in Värmland (Sweden) and Finnish Lapland (Finland). https://www.kau.se/files/2020-03/CRS_PolicyBrief_Eng_nr2-2019_A4_1912%20-%20ENG_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morales, D., & Dahlström, M. (2021). Smart specialisation and opportunities for green transformations in sparsely populated regions.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016). Speaking truth to power: The political dynamics of public sector innovation. In D. Kyriakou (Ed.), Governing smart specialisation (pp. 49–61). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Marques, P. (2019). The public animateur: Mission-led innovation and the “smart state” in Europe. Cambridge Journal of regions. Economy and Society, 12(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustalahti, I. (2018). The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3781–3790. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. (2018). Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 530–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417717069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c12297r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2019). Place leadership and the challenge of transformation: Policy platforms and innovation ecosystems in promotion of green growth. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1748–1767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1634006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar