‘Slowing down’ in small and medium-sized towns: Cittaslow in Germany and Italy from a social innovation perspective

REFERENCES

• Associazione Culturale Buendìa. (2006). Turismo e Consumi Sostenibili. Francavilla al Mare.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B. (2020). Introduction: Struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 423–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2020). Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – Phases, actors, conflicts. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 496–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cittaslow. (2017). Cittaslow international charter. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/page/files/257/charter_cittaslow_en_05_18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cittaslow. (2020). Cittaslow. International Network of Cities where living is good. https://www.cittaslow.org
   Google Scholar
• Comune di Tolfa. (2020). Tolfa Cittaslow. http://comune.tolfa.rm.it/vivere-la-citta/tolfa-cittaslow/
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, G. (2001). Turismo di qualità a Francavilla nel circuito ‘slow’. il centro, 17.03.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gillwald, K. (2000). Konzepte sozialer Innovation. WZB Discussion Paper No. P 00-519. WZB.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Jacobsen, H. (Eds.). (2010). Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen innovationsparadigma. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, M., Knoblauch, H., Rammert, W., & Windeler, A. (2011). Innovationsgesellschaft heute: Die reflexive Herstellung des Neuen. http://www.ts.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg226/TUTS/TUTS_WP_4_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, M., Knoblauch, H., Rammert, W., & Windeler, A. (2018). Innovation society today: The reflexive creation of novelty. In W. Rammert, A. Windeler, H. Knoblauch, & M. Hutter (Eds.), Innovation Society today (pp. 13–31). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2010). Medium-sized towns, strategic planning and creative governance. In C. Maria, C. Grazia, & M. Valeria (Eds.), Making strategies in spatial planning (pp. 27–45). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J., & Vicari Haddock, S. (Eds.). (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mareggi, M. (2002). Innovation in urban policy: The experience of Italian urban time policies. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350220150053
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogburn, W. F. (1964). On culture and social change. Phoenix Books; University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H., & Hutter, M. (Eds.). (2018). Innovation society today. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H., & Scheuerman, W. E. (Eds.). (2008). High-speed society: Social acceleration, power and modernity. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schober Architekten. (2012). Ein ISEK für Berching. Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer Architekten und Stadtplaner. (2015). Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept. ISEK Stadt Überlingen am Bodensee. Analyse/Bestandsbewertung.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, M., & Howaldt, J. (2010). ‘Soziale Innovation’ im Fokus. Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Senetra, A., & Szarek-Iwaniuk, P. (2020). Socio-economic development of small towns in the Polish Cittaslow network – A case study. Cities, 103, 102758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., & Hamdouch, A. (2017). Small and medium-sized towns in Europe: Conceptual, methodological and policy issues. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadt Berching. (2020). Berching ist Deutschlands 12. Città Slow. https://www.berching.de/cittaslow/
   Google Scholar
• Südkurier. (2005). In Überlingen lässt es sich leben. Südkurier, 16.03.2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. (2019). Cittàslow Überlingen. Der Erfolg der Langsamkeit. Deutschlandfunk Kultur. https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/cittaslow-ueberlingen-der-erfolg-der-langsamkeit.976.de.html?dram:article_id=453926
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, W. (1989). Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt, 40(1–2), 170–183.
   Google Scholar