Radical path transformation of the Norwegian and Tasmanian salmon farming industries

REFERENCES

• Aarset, B., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2015). Path dependency, institutionalization and co-evolution: The missing diffusion of the blue revolution in Norwegian aquaculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 41, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABARES. (2020). Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2018. https://doi.org/10.25814/5DE0959D55BAB
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems – A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development: Offshore wind and policy activism. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, J., Solheim, M. C. W., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Isaksen, A. (2022). One coast, two systems: Regional innovation systems and entrepreneurial discovery in Western Norway. Growth and Change, 53(2), 490–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate of Fisheries. (2020). Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. English. https://www.fiskeridir.no/English/Aquaculture/Statistics/Atlantic-salmon-and-rainbow-trout.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Tasmania. (2020). A Fresh Approach – Tasmanian Salmon Consumer Guide. https://www.salmon.org.au/about.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., & Smith, D. F. (1993). Venture capital formation, investment, and regional industrialization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01944.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). Industrial renewal: Narratives in play in the development of green technologies in the Norwegian salmon farming industry. The Geographical Journal, 183(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., Lindfors, E. T., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Coenen, L. (2021). Place-based directionality of innovation: Tasmanian salmon farming and responsible innovation. Sustainability, 13(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2001). Path dependence and creation. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties; The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2019). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously Led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., Uyarra, E., Njøs, R., & Fløysand, A. (2021). Policy action for green restructuring in specialized industrial regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 09697764211049116. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211049116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyllingstad, N., Rypestøl, J. O., Schulze-Krogh, A. C., & Tønnessen, M. (2021). Asset modification for regional industrial restructuring: Digitalization of the culture and experience industry and the healthcare sector. Regional Studies, 55(10–11), 1764–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1878126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfors, E. T., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2022). Sustainable regional industry development through co-evolution – The case of salmon farming and cell-based seafood production. Marine Policy, 135, 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M.-P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., & Normann, H. E. (2019). Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 130, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography – Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in West Sweden. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2144–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe Føre, H., Thorvaldsen, T., Osmundsen, T. C., Asche, F., Tveterås, R., Fagertun, J. T., & Bjelland, H. V. (2022). Technological innovations promoting sustainable salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture in Norway. Aquaculture Reports, 24, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOWI ASA. (2022). Salmon Farming Industry Handbook 2022 (p. 118). https://corpsite.azureedge.net/corpsite/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022-Salmon-Industry-Handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, 35(7), 925–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of New growth paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Sjøtun, S. G., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional agency and path creation: Institutional path from industrial to knowledge city. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 85–104). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2020). Aquaculture (terminated in Statistics Norway). Ssb.No. https://www.ssb.no/en/jord-skog-jakt-og-fiskeri/statistikker/fiskeoppdrett/aar/2020-10-29.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Weaver, T. (2017). Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy, 46(6), 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843–1866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Pflitsch, G. (2018). Micro-dynamics in regional transition paths to sustainability – Insights from the Augsburg region. Applied Geography, 90, 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveterås, R., Hovland, M., Reve, T., Misund, B., Nystøyl, R., Bjelland, H. V., Misund, A., & Fjelldal, Ø. (2020). Verdiskapingspotensiale og veikart for havbruk til havs (p. 177).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar