Regional sustainable development using a Quadruple Helix approach in Japan

REFERENCES

• Amry, D. K., Ahmad, A. J., & Lu, D. (2021). The new inclusive role of university technology transfer: Setting an agenda for further research. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Fitjar, R. D. (2019). Contextualizing the role of universities to regional development: Introduction to the special issue. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1601593s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briley, L., Brown, D., & Kalafatis, S. E. (2015). Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making. Climate Risk Management, 9, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future, Triple Helix, 7, 189–226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘QH’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
   Google Scholar
• Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. (2012). Innovation in creative industries: From the Quadruple Helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0051-x
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., Jonard, N., & Zimmermann, J. B. (2007). Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Management Science, 53(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2/3), 198–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The triple helix of university–industry–government: Implications for policy and evaluation. In: Working Paper 2002.11. Sweden: Science Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university industry–government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). The Horizon 202 Work Programme 2016–2017 Science with and for Society. European Commission Decision C (2016) 8265.
   Google Scholar
• Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur, A., & Kumar, M. (2018). A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25 years of IB research. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvea, R., Kassicieh, S., & Montoya, M. J. R. (2013). Using the quadruple helix to design strategies for the green economy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasche, N., Hoglund, L., & Linton, G. (2020). Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: Creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134
   Google Scholar
• Hoglund, L., & Linton, G. (2018). Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: A QH perspective. R&D Management, 48(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenov, O., & Shavina, E. (2018). The role of ‘Triple Helix’ innovative model in regional sustainable development. E3S Web of Conferences, 41, 04054. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104054
   Google Scholar
• Kimatu, J. N. (2016). Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(16), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0044-x
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, A., Bankins, S., & Molloy, C. (2018). Readying a region: Temporally exploring the development of an Australian regional QH. R&D Management, 48(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, QH, … , and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
   Google Scholar
• Luengo-Valderrey, M.-J., Pando-García, J., Periáñez-Cañadillas, I., & Cervera-Taulet, A. (2020). Analysis of the impact of the triple helix on sustainable innovation targets in Spanish technology companies. Sustainability, 12(8), 3274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, C., Marques, A. V., Braga, V., & Ratten, V. (2021). Technological transfer and spillovers within the RIS3 entrepreneurial ecosystems: A quadruple helix approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1777909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, M., & Debackere, K. (2018). Beyond ‘triple helix’ toward ‘QH’ models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: Toward a research agenda: Review of university technology transfer. R&D Management, 48(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108319905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
   Google Scholar
• Roman, M., Varga, H., Cvijanovic, V., & Reid, A. (2020). Quadruple helix models for sustainable regional innovation: Engaging and facilitating civil society participation. Economies, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8020048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhanen, L., & Cooper, C. (2004). Applying a knowledge management framework to tourism research. Tourism Recreation Research, 29(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2004.11081434
   Google Scholar
• Sampaolo, G., Lepore, D., & Spigarelli, F. (2021). Blue economy and the quadruple helix model: The case of Qingdao. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16803–16818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01378-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonmaker, M. G., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Mode 3: A proposed classification scheme for the knowledge economy and society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(4), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0097-4
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. (2013). Scientific mobility and knowledge transfer at the interregional and intraregional level. Regional Studies, 47(10), 1653–1667. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.549119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Kempton, L. (2020). Building collaborative platforms for urban innovation: Newcastle city futures as a quadruple helix intermediary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420905630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and method. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro- and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021). Triple helix twins: A framework for achieving innovation and UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(12), 6535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar