Green and just regional path development

REFERENCES

• Bainton, N., Kemp, D., Lèbre, E., Owen, J. R., & Marston, G. (2021). The energy–extractives nexus and the just transition. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J., & Werner, M. (2011). The place of disarticulations: Global commodity production in La laguna. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(5), 998–1015. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., & Truffer, B. (2020). Geographies of transition – From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Gong, H. (2022). Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: New-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies, 56(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. (2020). The dark side of regional industrial path development: Towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breul, M., Hulke, C., & Kalvelage, L. (2021). Path formation and reformation: Studying the variegated consequences of path creation for regional development. Economic Geography, 97(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1922277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceresola, R. G., & Crowe, J. (2015). Community leaders’ perspectives on shale development in the new Albany shale. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 30(1). https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol30/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., Martin, H., & Mattes, J. (2022). Grasping transformative regional development – Exploring intersections between industrial paths and sustainability transitions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X2211373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221137346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., & Mattes, J. (2020). The fragility of regional energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., & Simmie, J. (2018). New technological path creation and the role of institutions in different geo-political spaces. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1441380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., & Lipsig-Mummé, C. (2020). Future conditional: From just transition to radical transformation? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 26(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680120951684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Hansen, T., Glasmeier, A., & Hassink, R. (2021). Regional foundations of energy transitions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., Mackinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M., & Whyte, S. (2017). The Latrobe valley: The politics of loss and hope in a region of transition. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 23(3), 421–446.
   Google Scholar
• Eadson, W., & Foden, M. (2019). State, community and the negotiated construction of energy markets: Community energy policy in England. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 100, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadson, W., & van Veelen, B. (2021). Assemblage-democracy: Reconceptualising democracy through material resource governance. Political Geography, 88, 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espert, V., Arnold, K., Vallentin, D., Lechtenböhmer, S., & Schneider, C. (2016). Platform climate protection and industry North-Rhine Westphalia – A multi stakeholder process for the advancement of energy efficiency and low carbon technologies in energy intensive industries. Eceee Industrial Summer Study Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Phelan, L. (2016). Transitions to a post-carbon society: Linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy, 99, 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraggenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the single path view: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, A., Norman, J. B., Büchs, M., & Barrett, J. (2022). A “spatially just” transition? A critical review of regional equity in decarbonisation pathways. Energy Research & Social Science, 88, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & Jensen, P. D. (2022). Chasing after the wind? Green economy strategies, path creation and transitions in the offshore wind industry. Regional Studies, 56(10), 1671–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.2000958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrysson, M., & Nuur, C. (2021). The role of institutions in creating circular economy pathways for regional development. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496521991876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation (ILO). (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S., Uyarra, E., Njøs, R., & Fløysand, A. (2021). Policy action for green restructuring in specialized industrial regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29, 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211049116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). Industry legitimacy: Bright and dark phases in regional industry path development. Regional Studies, 56(4), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., & Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. (2022). Automated infrastructure: COVID-19 and the shifting geographies of supply chain capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 46(2), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211038718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D., Karlsen, A., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Afewerki, S., & Kenzhegaliyeva, A. (2022). Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind. Regional Studies, 56(4), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Lezaun, J. (2011). Materials and devices of the public. Economy and Society, 40(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.602293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, A. (2018). A just transition for coal miners? Community identity and support from local policy actors. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2009). Carbon democracy. Economy and Society, 38(3), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, A. (2021). How do incumbent companies’ heterogeneous responses affect sustainability transitions? Insights from China’s major incumbent power generators. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 39, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Njøs, R. (2021). Greening of regional industrial paths and the role of sectoral characteristics: A study of the maritime and petroleum sectors in an Arctic region. European Urban and Regional Studies 29, (2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211038412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, H. E., & Tellmann, S. J. (2021). Trade unions’ interpretation of a just transition in a fossil fuel economy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurdiawati, A., & Urban, F. (2022). Decarbonising the refinery sector: A socio-technical analysis of advanced biofuels, green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage developments in Sweden. Energy Research and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Karakaya, E., & Urban, F. (2022). Enabling the transition to a fossil-free steel sector: The conditions for technology transfer for hydrogen-based steelmaking in Europe. Energy Research and Social Science, 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson-Hazboun, S. K. (2018). Why are we being punished and they are being rewarded?” views on renewable energy in fossil fuels-based communities of the U.S. West. Extractive Industries and Society, 5(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, R., & Bryant, G. (2021). Labour in transition: A value-theoretical approach to renewable energy labour. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5, 1872–1894. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211055542
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Rainnie, A. (2021). Regional development and agency: Unfinished business. Local Economy, 36(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942211023877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, C., & Bailey, I. (2014). The green economy and post-growth regimes: Opportunities and challenges for economic geography. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 96(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12051
   Google Scholar
• Snell, D. (2018). ‘Just transition’? Conceptual challenges meet stark reality in a ‘transitioning’ coal region in Australia. Globalizations, 15(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1454679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Njøs, R. (2019). Green restructuring, innovation, and transitions in Norwegian industry: The role of economic geography. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 73(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1558281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevis, D. (2018). US labour unions and green transitions: Depth, breadth, and worker agency. Globalizations, 15(4), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1454681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2020). Planetary just transition? How inclusive and how just? Earth System Governance, 6, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100065
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Tödtling, F. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlund, M., & Hansen, T. (2022). Exploring alternative economic pathways: A comparison of foundational economy and Doughnut economics. Sustainability: Science. Practice and Policy, 18(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2030280
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Lo, K. (2021). Just transition: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 82, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While, A., & Eadson, W. (2022). Zero carbon as economic restructuring: Spatial divisions of labour and just transition. New Political Economy, 27(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1967909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., Zhang, R., Liu, H., Wang, G., & Sun, X. (2021). Resource endowment, industrial structure, and green development of the Yellow River basin. Sustainability, 13(8), 4530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar