Repeating partners and partnerships in European Territorial Cooperation: a quantitative analysis

REFERENCES

• Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75–82. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-dark-side-of-close-relationships/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baños, J., & Iglesias, A. (1995). La política regional europea y la cooperación transfronteriza. Estudios Regionales, 42, 181–212. http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/documentos/articulos/pdf465.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, B. (2017). European groupings of territorial cooperation: A means to harden spatially dispersed cooperation? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1394216
   Google Scholar
• Casper, S. (2007). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Research Policy, 36(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Todtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe. CengageBrain.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/231170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delecosse, É. (2020). Politique de cohésion: La simplification à l’épreuve de la complexité d’Interreg. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 58(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3917/rpve.591.0065
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D., & Zonneveld, W. (2007). The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, D., & Bamford, J. (2005). Your alliances are too stable. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 133–141. https://hbr.org/2005/06/your-alliances-are-too-stable
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esparza-Masana, R. (2020). Analysis of European interregional cooperation under Interreg programmes. The Case of Spain. Journal of Regional Research, 47, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.38191/iirr-jorr.20.008.
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2020). Net impact of Interreg. Luxembourg (LU): ESPON EGTC. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Net%20impact%20of%20INTERREG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feliu, J., Berzi, M., Martín-Uceda, J., Pastor, R., & Castañer, M. (2018). Cuatro fronteras europeas bajo la lupa: Una metodología para el análisis de los proyectos de cooperación transfronteriza (Interreg). Geographicalia, 63–64, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.532
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(Sep.), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393153
   Google Scholar
• Gil, R., & Marion, J. (2013). Self-enforcing agreements and relational contracting: Evidence from California highway procurement. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 29(2), 239–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewr026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J. (2007). Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, J. (2016). Impact of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) on the promotion and use of solar energy in the Mediterranean. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1150198
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, SI 19(4), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachmann, V. (2011). From mutual learning to joint working: Europeanization processes in the Interreg B programmes. European Planning Studies, 19(8), 1537–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.594667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, J. B., & Wathne, K. H. (2006). Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: A conceptual framework and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredero, M. I., & Olmedillas, B. (2009). Las fronteras españolas en Europa: de Interreg a la cooperación territorial europea. Investigaciones Regionales, 16, 191–215. https://investigacionesregionales.org/es/article/las-fronteras-espanolas-en-europa-de-interreg-a-la-cooperacion-territorial-europea/
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. R., & Hitt, M. A. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S., & Parmigiani, A. (2016). Friends and profits don’t mix: The performance implications of repeated partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Arrfelt, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1035–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, M., & Herrmann, H. (2011). Half empty or half full? Over 30 years of regional cross-border cooperation within the EU: Experiences at the Dutch–German and Danish–German border. Journal of Borderland Studies, 26(1), 1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.590289
   Google Scholar
• Koka, B., & Prescott, J. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leick, B. (2012). Business networks in cross-border regions of the enlarged EU: What do we know in the post-enlargement era? Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(3), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.750952
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Uceda, J., & Castañer, M. (2018). Actores y proyectos transfronterizos en las fronteras ibéricas: Análisis comparativo de Interreg IV-A. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 78(78), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2432
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2010). Old versus recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden. Area, 42(4), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014). Territorial cohesion trends in inner Scandinavia: The role of cross-border cooperation – Interreg A 1994–2010. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(5), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.960949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017). Cross-border cooperation in inner Scandinavia: A territorial impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2018). Should EU cross-border cooperation programmes focus mainly on reducing border obstacles? Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 64(3), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., Zaucha, J., & Ciołek, D. (2022). Measuring territorial cohesion trends in Europe: A correlation with EU Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, (published online).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, J., Dubois, A., Hanell, T., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Pettersson, K., Roto, J., & Steineke, J. M. (2007). Regional development in the Nordic countries. Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, J. H., Eskilsson, L., & Ek, R. (2010). Creating cross-border destinations: Interreg programs and regionalisation in the Baltic Sea Area. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 10(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250903561978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrazzini, L. (2005). Applying the ESDP through Interreg IIIB: A southern perspective. European Planning Studies, 13(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000321848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, J. I. (2002). Orientaciones, conceptos e incertidumbres de la política regional europea para el siglo XXI. Revista de Estudios Regionales, 64, 43–63. http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/documentos/articulos/pdf724.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E. K. (2011). Cross-border regionalization, the INTERREG III A initiative, and local cooperation at the Finnish–Swedish border. Environment and Planning A, 43(5), 1190–1208. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The Interreg experience in bridging European territories. A 30-year summary. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. The urban book series (pp. 7–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics, 19(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00086
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunisi, A., & Zanfei, A. (1998). Exploiting and creating knowledge through costumer–supplier relationships: Lessons from a case study. R&D Management, 28(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, J., Rutten, R., & Benneworth, P. (2020). Innovation and SMEs in Interreg policy: Too early to move beyond bike lanes? Policy Studies, 41(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1539225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettoretto, L. (2009). A preliminary critique of the best and good practices approach in European spatial planning and policy-making. European Planning Studies, 17(7), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310902949620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wink, R. (2010). Transregional institutional learning in Europe: Prerequisites, actors and limitations. Regional Studies, 44(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802331304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts, S., & Geyskens, I. (2005). The formation of buyer–supplier relationships: Detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.701.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar