REFERENCES
- Asheim, B. T. (2002). Temporary organisations and spatial embeddedness of learning and knowledge creation. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 84(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2002.00117.x
- Benneworth, P., & Hospers, G. J. (2007). The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global–local pipelines. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0620
- Blažek, J., & Květoň, V. (2022). Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional development: The case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054976
- Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2018). Evolutionary economic geography. Oxford University Press.
- Boschma, R. A. (1997). New industries and windows of locational opportunity: A long-term analysis of Belgium. Erdkunde, 51(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In John Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46–58). Greenwood Press.
- European Commission. (2021). The Just Transition Mechanism: Making sure no one is left behind. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funding/just-transition-fund_en
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
- Grabher, G.. (1993). The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in Ruhr Area. In Gernot Grabher (Ed.), The Embedded Firm; on the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks (pp. 255–277)). Routledge.
- Green, D. (2016). How change happens. Oxford University Press.
- Grillitsch, M., Rekers, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2019). Trinity of change agency: Connecting agency and structure in studies of regional development (No. 2019/12). Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.
- Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
- Hendl, J. (2016). Kvalitativní výzkum: Základní teorie, metody a aplikace. Praha: Kvalitativní výzkum: Základní teorie, metody a aplikace.
- Kinossian, N. (2019). Agents of change in peripheral regions. Baltic Worlds, 61–66.
- Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
- Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600102
- Píša, J. (2022). Agents of change in Ústí nad Labem Region [Doctoral dissertation]. J. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Czechia.
- Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
- Rekers, J. V., & Stihl, L. (2021). One crisis, one region, two municipalities: The geography of institutions and change agency in regional development paths. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 124, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.012
- Trippl, M., & Tödtling, F.. (2008). Cluster renewal in old industrial regions: Continuity or radical change?. In Charlie Karlsson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory (pp. 203–218). Edward Elgar Publishing.