References
- Tasian GE, Wiebe DJ, Casale P. Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows. J Urol. 2013;190:1622–1627.
- Training requirements for the subspecialty paediatric urology under both urology and paediatric surgery; 2014. Available from: http://www.uems.eu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/19465/Final-Training-requirements-paediatric-urology.pdf
- Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX, et al. Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2013;189:1083–1086.
- Riachy E, Cost NG, Defoor WR, et al. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. J Urol. 2013;189:283–287.
- Subotic U, Rohard I, Weber DM, et al. A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:354–358.
- Kim S, Canter D, Leone N, et al. A comparative study between laparoscopic and robotically assisted pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. J Urol. 2008;179:357.
- O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87:287–289.
- Thorup J, Jokela R, Cortes D, et al. The results of 15 years of consistent strategy in treating antenatally suspected pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. BJU Int. 2003;91:850–852.
- Liu DB, Ellimoottil C, Flum AS, et al. Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty. J Ped Urol. 2014;10:610–615.
- Sukumar S, Sun M, Karakewicz PI, et al. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2012;188:913–918.
- Huang Y, Wu Y, Shan W, et al. An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction inchildren. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:4922–4931.
- Ekin RG, Celik O, Ilbey YO. An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68:245–251.
- Anderberg M, Larsson J, Kockum CC, et al. Robotics versus laparoscopy: an experimental study of the transfer effect in maiden users. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2010;4:3.
- Mason MD, Herndon CDA, Herbst KW, et al. Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Robotic Surg. 2014;8:365–369.
- Cundy TP, Gattas NE, White AD, et al. Learning curve evaluation using cumulative summation analysis–a clinical example of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:1368–1373.
- Avery DI, Herbst KW, Lendvay TS, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants. J Ped Urol. 2015;11:139.e1–139.e5.