Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy under intravenous sedation for treatment of urolithiasis

References

• Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol. 1982;127:417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ. Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1989;141:782–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaussy CG, Tiselius H-G. How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?. Urolithiasis 2018;46:3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semins MJ, Matlaga BR. How to improve results with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Ther Adv Urol. 2009;1:99–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scales CD, Krupski TL, Curtis LH, et al. Practice Variation in the Surgical Management of Urinary Lithiasis. J Urol. 2011;186:146–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingeman JE. EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24:185–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen C, Chandhoke P, Moore M, et al. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol. 2002;168:35–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilmez T, Tekin MI, Gonen M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a New-Generation Shockwave Lithotripsy Machine in the Treatment of Single Renal or Ureteral Stones: Experience with 2670 Patients. J Endourol. 2007;21:23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap J, Mishra S, Bhattu A, et al. Evolution of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) technique: a 25-year single centre experience of >5000 patients. BJU Int. 2014;114:748–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichel L, Batzold P, Erturk E. Operator Experience and Adequate Anesthesia Improve Treatment Outcome with Third-Generation Lithotripters. J Endourol. 2001;15:671–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmansy HE, Lingeman JE. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update. Int J Surg. 2016;36:676–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skuginna V, Nguyen DP, Seiler R, et al. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2016;69:267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach C, Karaolides T, Buchholz N. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: What is new?. Arab J Urol. 2012;10:289–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabnis RB, Naik K, Patel SH, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones: can clearance be predicted? Br J Urol. 1997;80:853–857.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander CE, Gowland S, Cadwallader J, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): outcomes from a national SWL database in New Zealand. BJU Int. 2016;117:76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach GW, Dretler S, Fair W, et al. Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1986;135:1127–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley TB, Myers DA, Grine WB, et al. Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1993;149:1419–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson AJ, Cranston D, Doble A, et al. The mobile lithotriptor: an answer for the smaller centre. Br J Urol. 1993;71:396–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cass AS. Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1995;153:588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhilali MM, Stoller ML, McNamara TC, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the Dornier compact lithotriptor: an evaluative multicenter study. J Urol. 1996;155:834–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W, Klein F. Five-year clinical experience with the Dornier Delta lithotriptor. Urology 2006;68:28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty R, Burr J, Simmonds N, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole and non-lower pole stones from a university teaching hospital: Parallel group comparison during the same time period. Urol Ann. 2015;7:46–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmaier WL. Recent advances in understanding and managing urolithiasis. F1000Res. 2016;5:2651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiong E, Hwee STP, Kay LM, et al. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2005;65:1070–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijvikai K, de la Rosette JJM. Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudon M, Donsimoni R, Hennequin C, et al. Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy. Urol Res. 1995;23:319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prien EL, Frondel C. Studies in urolithiasis; the composition of urinary calculi. J Urol. 1947;57:949–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Saw KC, Paterson RF, et al. Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2003;61:1092–1096. discussion 1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Paterson RF, Kopecky KK, et al. High Resolution Detection of Internal Structure of Renal Calculi By Helical Computerized Tomography. J Urol. 2002;167:322–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment Selection and Outcomes: Renal Calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34:409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, et al. Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol. 2002;167:1968–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, et al. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2008;72:765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas O, Bakirtas H, Sener NC, et al. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones. Urolithiasis 2014;42:115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar