References
- Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61:341–349.
- Merseburger AS, Herrmann TRW, Shariat SF, et al. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology. Eur Urol. 2013;64:277–291.
- Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4736–4741, discussion 4741.
- Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1370–1371.
- Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology. 2000;55:630–634.
- Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 1997;226:238–246; discussion 246–247.
- Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Petros JA, et al. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J Urol. 1993;150:396–398; discussion 399.
- Soulié M, Salomon L, Seguin P, et al. Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology. 2001;58:899–903.
- Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, et al. A surgeon robot prostatectomy-a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol. 1989;13:273–277.
- Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 2004;171:2629–2631.
- Olsen LH. Urologic computer-assisted laparoscopy/retroperitoneoscopy. The Danish Society of Urology. Ugeskr Laeg. 2003;165:1259.
- Ouellet S, Carmel M, Martel A, et al. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed on >/= 10 cm tumors. Can J Urol. 2014;21:7487–7495.
- Tan H-J, Wolf JS, Ye Z, et al. Complications and failure to rescue after laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011;186:1254–1260.
- Gong EM, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison of clinical stage T1 and T2 renal tumors. Urology. 2006;68:1183–1187.
- Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, et al. Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1022–1028.
- Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, et al. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol. 2002;168:23–26.
- Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, et al. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-year analysis. Urology. 2004;63:27–32.
- Patel HD, Ball MW, Cohen JE, et al. Morbidity of urological surgical procedures: an analysis of rates, risk factors, and outcomes. Urology. 2015;85:552–560.
- Cadeddu JA, Wolfe JS, Nakada S, et al. Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 2001;166:2109–2111.
- Danish Urological Assosciation, UroLap annual report 2015. 2015. http://urologi.dk/sites/default/files/nyheder/urolap_200816.pdf.
- Azawi NH, Christensen T, Petri AL, et al. Prolonged length of hospital stay in Denmark after nephrectomy. Dan Med J. 2012;59:A4446.
- Azawi N, Christensen T, Dahl C, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic nephrectomy as outpatient procedure-a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol. 2018. http://urologi.dk/sites/default/files/nyheder/urolap_200816.pdf.
- Azawi NH, Christensen T, Dahl C, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy as outpatient surgery. J Urol. 2016;195:1671–1676.
- Patel HR, Cerantola Y, Valerio M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol. 2014;65:263–266.
- Sotelo RJ, Haese A, Machuca V, et al. Safer surgery by learning from complications: a focus on robotic prostate surgery. Eur Urol. 2016;69:334–344.