References
- Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2019;75:74–84.
- Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. European Urol. 2015;67:913–924.
- MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61:972–993.
- Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004;64:914–918.
- Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007;51:186–191; discussion 191–192.
- Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DYT, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology. 2010;75:1328–1334.
- Bergström M, Ivarsson M-L, Holmdahl L. Peritoneal response to pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1465–1469.
- Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, et al. Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 2002;59:37–41.
- Pavan N, Derweesh IH, Hampton L, et al. Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative outcomes. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):591–596.
- Borghesi M, Schiavina R, Chessa F, et al. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison of perioperative and early oncological outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:e391–e396.
- Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2012;62:617–618.
- Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786–793.
- Tellini R, Antonelli A, Tardanico R, et al. Positive surgical margins predict progression-free survival after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: results from a single center cohort of 459 cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):e26–e31.
- Peyronnet B, Tondut L, Bernhard J-C, et al. Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study. BJU Int. 2018;121(6):916–922.
- Mari A, Antonelli A, Bertolo R, et al. Predictive factors of overall and major postoperative complications after partial nephrectomy: results from a multicenter prospective study (The RECORd 1 project). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:823–830.
- Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT, et al. Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol. 2017;35:1721–1728.
- Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol. 2017;31:158–162.
- Azawi NH, Christensen T, Dahl C, et al. Pushing the envelope: laparoscopic nephrectomy as outpatient surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:2.
- Azawi N, Christensen T, Dahl C, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic nephrectomy as outpatient procedure-a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol. 52(1):45–51.
- Petros FG, Metcalfe MJ, Yu K-J, et al. Oncologic outcomes of patients with positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy: a 25-year single institution experience. World J Urol. 2018;36(7):1093–1101.