Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Volume 53, 2019 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
124
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A randomised trial comparing two protocols for transrectal prostate repeat biopsy: six lateral posterior plus six anterior cores versus a standard posterior 12-core biopsy

Joakim ÖrtegrenSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Växjö, Sweden; ;Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-6544View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Jan Tage HolmbergSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Växjö, Sweden; ;Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ljungby Hospital, Ljungby, Sweden; View further author information
,
Edvard LekåsSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Växjö, Sweden; View further author information
,
Sabah ManaSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ljungby Hospital, Ljungby, Sweden; View further author information
,
Stig MårtenssonSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Växjö, Sweden; ;Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ljungby Hospital, Ljungby, Sweden; View further author information
,
Jonas RichthoffSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ljungby Hospital, Ljungby, Sweden; View further author information
,
Pernilla SundqvistDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; View further author information
,
Henrik KjölhedeDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6441-4729View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Ola BrattDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; View further author information
&
Fredrik LiedbergDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; ;Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, SwedenView further author information
 show all
Pages 217-221 | Received 03 May 2019, Accepted 02 Jun 2019, Published online: 17 Jun 2019

References

  • Würnschimmel C, Grande P, Moschini M, et al. Accuracy of standardized 12-core template biopsies versus non-standardized biopsies for detection of Epstein Grade 5 prostate cancer regarding the histology of the prostatectomy specimen. Prostate. 2018;78:365–369.
  • Irani J, Blanchet P, Salomon L, et al. Is an extended 20-core prostate biopsy protocol more efficient than the standard 12-core? A randomized multicenter trial. J Urol. 2013;190:77–83.
  • Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M, et al. Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2012;79:37–42.
  • Zaytoun OM, Moussa AS, Gao T, et al. Office based transrectal saturation biopsy improves prostate cancer detection compared to extended biopsy in the repeat biopsy population. J Urol. 2011;186:850–854.
  • Paul R, Korzinek C, Necknig U, et al. Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate. Urology 2004;64:532–536.
  • Schouten MG, van der Leest M, Pokorny M, et al. Why and where do we miss significant prostate cancer with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-guided and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men?. Eur Urol. 2017;71:896–903.
  • Seles M, Gutschi T, Mayrhofer K, et al. Sampling of the anterior apical region results in increased cancer detection and upgrading in transrectal repeat saturation biopsy of the prostate. BJU Int. 2016;117:592–597.
  • Mabjeesh N, Lidawi G, Chen J, et al. High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int. 2012;110:993–997.
  • Bott S, Henderson A, Halls J, et al. Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results. Urology 2006;68:1037–1041.
  • Ching CB, Moussa AS, Li J, et al. Does transrectal ultrasound probe configuration really matter? End fire versus side fire probe prostate cancer detection rates. J Urol. 2009;181:2077–2083.
  • Rom M, Pycha A, Wiunig C, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing prostate cancer detection rates of end-fire and side-fire transrectal ultrasound probe configuration. Urology 2012;80:15–18.
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
  • Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW, et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1192–1202.
  • National Guidelines in Prostate cancer care. [accessed 2018 Sep. 28]. Available from: https://www.cancercentrum.se/samverkan/cancerdiagnoser/prostata/vardprogram/gallande-vardprogram-prostatacancer/9.-diagnostik/
  • Al-Ahmadie HA, Tickoo S, Olgac K, et al. Anterior-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:229–235.
  • Ching CB, Zaytoun O, Moussa AS, et al. Type of transrectal ultrasonography probe influences prostate cancer detection rates on repeat prostate biopsy. BJU Int. 2012;110:46–49.
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017;389:815–822.
  • Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1767–1777.
  • Faria R, Soares MO, Spackman E, et al. Optimising the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS). Eur Urol. 2018;73:23–30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.