Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Volume 53, 2019 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
1,126
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are TRUS-guided prostate biopsies in clinical practice robust enough to make a correct assessment of the surgical strategy in prostatectomies? Poor correlation between preoperative prostate biopsies and postoperative specimens

Pontus NilssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umea, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Peter StröbergDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden
Pages 282-286 | Received 25 Mar 2019, Accepted 05 Aug 2019, Published online: 27 Aug 2019

References

  • https://www.cancercentrum.se/samverkan/cancerdiagnoser/prostata/vardprogram/gallande-vardprogram-prostatacancer/.
  • Areal Calama J. [Conventional transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. Current role, indications, techniques and limitations]. Arch Esp Urol. 2015;68:282–295.
  • Serefoglu EC, Altinova S, Ugras NS, et al. How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer? Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:E293–E298.
  • Tei H, Miyake H, Harada K, et al. Detection of significant prostate cancer according to anatomical areas of sampling cores obtained with transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Curr Urol. 2014;8:91–95.
  • Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M, et al. Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology. 2012;79:37–42.
  • Chambó RC, Tsuji FH, de Oliveira Lima F, et al. What is the ideal core number for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy? Korean J Urol. 2014;55:725–731.
  • Miyoshi Y, Furuya M, Teranishi J, et al. Comparison of 12- and 16-core prostate biopsy in japanese patients with serum prostate-specific antigen level of 4.0–20.0 ng/mL. Urol J. 2014;11:1609–1614.
  • Bladou F, Fogaing C, Levental M, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: systematic and/or magnetic-resonance imaging-targeted. CUAJ. 2017;11:E330–E337.
  • Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013;64:713–719.
  • Weiss B, Loeb S. MRI/Ultrasound fusion biopsy versus standard 12-core biopsy. Rev Urol. 2015;17:113–115.
  • Sinnott M, Falzarano SM, Hernandez AV, et al. Discrepancy in prostate cancer localization between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in patients with unilateral positive biopsy: implications for focal therapy. Prostate. 2012;72:1179–1186.
  • Suer E, Gokce MI, Gulpinar O, et al. How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options? Scand J Urol. 2014;48:177–182.
  • Chung MS, Lee SH, Lee DH, et al. Is small prostate volume a predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy? Yonsei Med J. 2013;54:902–906.
  • Obek C, Louis P, Civantos F, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. J Urol. 1999;161:494–498.
  • Pietzak EJ, Resnick MJ, Mucksavage P, et al. Multiple repeat prostate biopsies and the detection of clinically insignificant cancer in men with large prostates. Urology. 2014;84:380–385.
  • Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:438–450.
  • Demirel HC, Davis JW. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: overview of the technique, clinical applications in prostate biopsy and future directions. Turk J Urol. 2018;44:93–102.
  • Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MR, Houterman S, et al. Surgeons underestimate their patients' desire for preoperative information. World J Surg. 2008;32:964–970.
  • Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 ;358:1250–1261.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.