References
- Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF, et al. Repeat transurethral resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018;73(6):925–933.
- Nisky I, Huang F, Milstein A, et al. Perception of stiffness in laparoscopy – the fulcrum effect. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:313–319.
- Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, et al. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998;30(07):617–620.
- Bos D, Allard CB, Dason S, et al. Impact of resident involvement in endoscopic bladder cancer surgery on pathological outcomes. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(3):234–238.
- Jancke G, Rosell J, Jahnson S. Impact of surgical experience on recurrence and progression after transurethral resection of bladder tumour in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Scand. Scand J Urol. 2014;48(3):276–283.
- Allard CB, Meyer CP, Gandaglia G, et al. The effect of resident involvement on perioperative outcomes in transurethral urologic surgeries. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(5):1018–1025.
- Mcgaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, et al. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):375–385.
- McGaghie WC, Sajid AW, Miller GE, et al. Competence-based curriculum development in medical education. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 1978.
- Noureldin YA, Sweet RM. A call for a shift in theory and terminology for validation studies in urological education. J Urol. 2018;199(3):617–620.
- Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, et al. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(2):233–250.
- Konge L, Ringsted C, Bjerrum F, et al. The simulation centre at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):362–365.
- Bloch R, Norman G. Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68. Med Teach. 2012;34(11):960–992.
- Jørgensen M, Konge L, Subhi Y. Contrasting groups’ standard setting for consequences analysis in validity studies: reporting considerations. Adv Simul. 2018;3:1–7.
- Schulz GB, Grimm T, Buchner A, et al. Validation of a high-end virtual reality simulator for training transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Surg Educ. 2018;76:568–577.
- Schout BMA, Bemelmans BLH, Martens EJ, et al. How useful and realistic is the uro trainer for training transurethral prostate and bladder tumor resection procedures? J Urol. 2009;181(3):1297–1303.
- Kruck S, Bedke J, Hennenlotter J, et al. Virtual bladder tumor transurethral resection: an objective evaluation tool to overcome learning curves with and without photodynamic diagnostics. Urol Int. 2011;87(2):138–142.
- Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, et al. Residents’ procedural experience does not ensure competence: a research synthesis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):201–208.
- Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):1006–1012.
- Konge L, Arendrup H, Von Buchwald C, et al. Using performance in multiple simulated scenarios to assess bronchoscopy skills. Respiration. 2011;81(6):483–490.
- de Vries AH, Muijtjens AMM, van Genugten HGJ, et al. Development and validation of the TOCO–TURBT tool: a summative assessment tool that measures surgical competency in transurethral resection of bladder tumour. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(12):4923–4931.
- Colaco HB, Hughes K, Pearse E, et al. Construct validity, assessment of the learning curve, and experience of using a low-cost arthroscopic surgical simulator. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(1):47–54.
- Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2003;185(2):146–149.
- Moore AK, Grow DR. Novices outperform experienced laparoscopists on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. Source J Risk Insur. 1992;59:221–238.
- Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Validity and its threats. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R, editors. Assessment in health professions education. London (UK): Routledge; 2009.
- Noureldin YA, Lee JY, McDougall EM, et al. Competency-based training and simulation: making a “valid” argument. J Endourol. 2018;32(2):84–93.
- Borgersen NJ, Naur TMH, Sørensen SMD, et al. Gathering validity evidence for surgical simulation. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1063–1068.
- Ilgen JS, Ma IWY, Hatala R, et al. A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ. 2015;49(2):161–173.
- Nayahangan LJ, Bølling Hansen R, Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment. Scand J Urol. 2017;51(6):484–490.
- Babjuk M, Vice-Chair MB, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and CIS). 2017;71:447–461.
- World Health Organization. Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training: World Health Organization guidelines 2013. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2013.
- McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, et al. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–711.