http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-9904
References
- Nadler, RB, Loeb S, Clemens JQ et al. A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors—is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach? J Urol. 2006;175:1230–1234.
- Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6–18.
- Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:468–473.
- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guildeline for management of the clincial T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271–1279.
- Badalato GM, Kates M, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach. BJU Int. 2012;109:1457–1462.
- Bertolo R, Autorino R, Simone G, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors: a multicenter analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group). Eur Urol. 2018;74:226–232.
- Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, et al. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol. 2014;65:372–377.
- Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1606–1615.
- MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur. Urol. 2012;61:972–993.
- Sun M, Trinh QD, Bianchi M, et al. A non–cancer-related survival benefit is associated with partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:725–731.
- Becker A, Ravi P, Roghmann F, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption. Urology. 2014;83:1285–1292.
- Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2002;167:1257–1262.
- Zhang X, Shen Z, Zhong S, et al. Comparison of peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2013;112:1133–1142.
- Ljungberg B, Campbell SC, Cho HY, et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;60:615–621.
- Filson CP, Schwarts K, Colt JS, et al. Use of nephron sparing surgery among renal cell carcinoma patients with diabetes and hypertension. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:15–21.
- Hennus PM, Kroeze SG, Bosch JL, et al. Impact of comorbidity on complications after nephrectomy: use of the Clavien Classification of Surgical Complications. BJU Int. 2012;110:682–687.
- Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–853.
- Sea JC, Bahler CD, Mendonsa E, et al. Comparison of measured renal tumor size versus R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in predicting patient outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2013;27:1471–1476.
- Png KS, Bahler CD, Milgrom DP, et al. The role of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in the era of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2013;27:304–308.
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
- Garisto J, Bertolo R, Dagenais J, et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2018;36:471.e1–471.e9.
- Wang Y, Shao J, Ma X, et al. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up. World J Urol. 2017;35:73–80.