References
- Halachmi S, Pillar G. Congenital urological anomalies diagnosed in adulthood – management considerations. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:2–7.
- Barbosa JA, Chow JS, Benson CB, et al. Postnatal longitudinal evaluation of children diagnosed with prenatal hydronephrosis: insights in natural history and referral pattern. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:1242–1249.
- Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:430–452.
- Arap MA, Torricelli FC, Mitre AI, et al. Lessons from 90 consecutive laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties in a residency program. Scand J Urol. 2013;47:323–327.
- Nakada MD, Best SL, et al. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh urology. Vol. 2, 11th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2016. p. 1104–1147.
- Aziz MA, Hossain AZ, Banu T, et al. In hydronephrosis less than 10% kidney function is not an indication for nephrectomy in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002;12:304–307.
- Bansal R, Ansari MS, Srivastava A, et al. Long-term results of pyeloplasty in poorly functioning kidneys in the pediatric age group. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:25–28.
- Menon P, Rao KL, Bhattacharya A, et al. Outcome analysis of pediatric pyeloplasty in units with less than 20% differential renal function. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:171.e1–171.e7.
- Wagner M, Mayr J, Häcker FM. Improvement of renal split function in hydronephrosis with less than 10% function. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:156–159.
- Gnech M, Berrettini A, Lopes RI, et al. Pyeloplasty vs. nephrectomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in poorly functioning kidneys (differential renal function <20%): a multicentric study. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15:553.e1–553.e8.
- Nayyar R, Yadav S, Singh P, et al. Outcomes of pyeloplasty in very poorly functioning kidneys: examining the myths. Urology. 2016;92:132–135.
- Ortapamuk H, Naldoken S, Tekdogan UY, et al. Differential renal function in the prediction of recovery in adult obstructed kidneys after pyeloplasty. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17:663–668.
- Zhang S, Zhang Q, Ji C, et al. Improved split renal function after percutaneous nephrostomy in young adults with severe hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2015;193:191–195.
- Nishi M, Matsumoto K, Fujita T, et al. Improvement in renal function and symptoms of patients treated with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with less than 20% split renal function. J Endourol. 2016;30:1214–1218.
- Wu AK, Tran TC, Sorensen MD, et al. Relative renal function does not improve after relieving chronic renal obstruction. BJU Int. 2012;109:1540–1544.
- Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al, for the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612.
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
- Elbaset MA, Zahran MH, Sharaf MA, et al. Long term functional success after pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteral junction obstruction in unilateral poorly functioning kidney in exclusively adults population. Urology. 2019;131:234–239.
- Keramida G, James JM, Prescott MC, et al. Pitfalls and limitations of radionuclide renal imaging in adults. Semin Nucl Med. 2015;45:428–439.
- Gupta DK, Chandrasekharam VV, Srinivas M, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and poor renal function. Urology. 2001;57:547–550.
- Himan F. The condition of renal counterbalance and the theory of renal atrophy. J Urol. 1943;49:392–400.
- Rivas JG, Gregorio SA, Eastmond MP, et al. Renal function recovery after laparosocopic pyeloplasty. Cent European J Urol. 2014;67:210–213.
- Harraz AM, Taha DE, Shalaby I, et al. Evaluation of factors predicting recoverability of renal function after pyeloplasty in adults. Urol Int. 2014;93:403–405.